Game Politics ([info]gamepolitics) wrote,

Louisiana State Senator Plans 2006 Game Legislation

Hot Coffee, Phase One, seems to drawing to a close.

Now we move into Phase Two: the fallout.

According to an article in 2theAdvocate (Baton Rouge), Louisiana State Senator David Cain (R-Dry Creek) is planning to introduce video game legislation in the 2006 session. Cain's proposed bill is a reaction to the Hot Coffee scandal surrounding Rockstar Games' Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas

Like current bills in Illinois, California, North Carolina and Michigan, Cain's legislation would bar sales of violent and sexually explicit games to minors. The Senator told 2theAdvocate that many video games are "pretty bad...and it's getting worse - shooting, killing - and now they have sexual conquest."

Cain also said he expects the federal government "eventually" to get involved, but added, "sometimes it takes so long for them to pass anything. We can go and do it pretty quick" at the state level.

EDITOR'S NOTE: Is it just GP, or does Sen. Cain sound like he doesn't really know much about games beyond what he has seen on the news? And isn't the federal government pretty heavily involved already, what with the FTC investigation, Sen. Hillary Clinton's proposed legislation, and others like Senator Sam Brownback (R-KS) and Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich) jumping into the fray?

The article also notes that the Hot Coffee scandal is not the first time Cain has inserted himself into a hot-button issue. This year, for example, the politician jumped into the Teri Schiavo case.


  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 13 comments

[info]octavia_hemahi

August 7 2005, 12:38:25 UTC 6 years ago

Each time I hear that they are going to do something it worries me but makes me feel a bit better. I think there should be a law about having minors getting games like that but we all know that they can get it from their older brothers or sisters or even parents. So its not a prefect system nothing ever is.

They can never get rid of all violent games because its mostly 20-30 year olds playing the games. I hope some kind of law goes through so that way people will calm down because they have some kinda of "protect" to make them rest easy at night. As for me, I think it should be the parents watching after their kids. And take responablity because I am getting tired of the blaming video games for their kids problems.

Anonymous

August 7 2005, 13:07:37 UTC 6 years ago

Blah!

Just another unconstitional law that won't make it anywhere.

[info]ferrarimanf355

August 7 2005, 15:26:49 UTC 6 years ago

Wait a minute...

Isn't Louisiana trying to lure game developers to their state? In that case, I think that this will go nowhere...

[info]gamepolitics

August 7 2005, 15:49:43 UTC 6 years ago

Re: Wait a minute...

Yes - good point!

[info]ferrarimanf355

August 7 2005, 16:07:35 UTC 6 years ago

Re: Wait a minute...

Yeah- if the governor of Louisiana signed a bill encouraging video game development in the bayou, and considering reports that the long-awaited third Mortal Kombat movie will be filmed there, I believe that the governor will veto this...

[info]caf_pow

August 7 2005, 15:44:07 UTC 6 years ago

Is it just GP, or does Sen. Cain sound like he doesn't really know much about games beyond what he has seen on the news?

it certainly sounds like he never played the original leisure suit larry. what a chump. :/

[info]quartermaine

August 7 2005, 16:16:37 UTC 6 years ago

Yay

Example of political opportunism #999999999999!

Anonymous

August 7 2005, 18:17:35 UTC 6 years ago

I loled!

Yeah, even from these few quotes it seems this dude has no idea what's going on with games.

Too bad there's no real repercussions for having your legislation defeated. The originators of defeated legislation should receive a public flogging so they think twice next time :D

Anonymous

August 7 2005, 21:44:18 UTC 6 years ago

I'm not too sure, because I'm not American, but isn't it already illegal to sell a violent (and by violent, I presume they mean Mature or AO) game to a minor? It is illegal over here to sell Mature or 18 rated games to minors, company can have their video licensing laws revoked, and be prosecuted.

[info]gamepolitics

August 7 2005, 21:54:59 UTC 6 years ago

No, in the USA it is a voluntary compliance system. Legislating what could be sold to minors has been interpreted by courts to be a violation of the free speech protections of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution...

Anonymous

August 8 2005, 15:15:40 UTC 6 years ago

At lease two major retailers have policies against selling MA rated games to minors. I don't know how many times I sold games to parents even though I tried to dissuade them.

[info]phoenixzero

August 8 2005, 00:22:10 UTC 6 years ago

This coming from a guy who's state's biggest draw is Mardi Gras, where people (including many under 21) get drunk in the streets and the drunk girls flash strangers to get some crappy beads.. Not to mention all the other things that go on...

Then there's all the corruption in the state and local governments...

Hmm......

Anonymous

September 21 2005, 12:20:53 UTC 6 years ago

What's the big deal?

Hiya

This guy is obviously a scandal-mongering political manouverer who doesn't know his pong from his ping, but what's the problem with restricting the sale of hyper-violent / sexual games to kids? Here in the UK we have a policy where films and certain games are given certificates (12, 15, 18) by the British Board of Film Classification. It's illegal to sell them to people under that age. So why is introducing a similar sensible system a big constitutional no-no in the US?

Oh, and anyone wanting to pass game related laws should be forced to attend classes where they are taught about the history of games, and made to play the most influential games.

Stu
Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Facebook Twitter More login options
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…