Game Politics ([info]gamepolitics) wrote,
@ 2006-08-07 08:30:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:amicus, bridge burning, burning bridges, burton guidry, charles foti, concerns of police survivors, cops, esa vs. foti, hb1381, jack thompson, judge brady, kathleen babineaux blanco, lawsuits, legislation, louisiana

Suddenly, Jack Thompson is Feuding With Former Louisiana Allies

Controversial Miami attorney Jack Thompson appears to be burning bridges in Louisiana, the state where he has enjoyed the most success to date in his long-standing crusade against violent video games.

A series of e-mails forwarded to GamePolitics by Thompson detail a rapidly deteriorating relationship with the office of Louisiana Attorney General Charles Foti. Foti is a named defendant in ESA/EMA vs. Foti, the video game industry's constitutional challenge to the state's recently-passed video game law.

In particular, the mercurial Thompson expresses frustration with Deputy A.G. Burton Guidry, the man leading Louisiana's defense against the game industry's lawsuit. Hitherto, Guidry has been extremely supportive of the video game statute in his public comments, vowing on behalf of A.G. Foti to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, if need be.

Based on Thompson's e-mails, however, the working relationship between the Louisiana Attorney General's Office and the controversial Miami lawyer apparently began unraveling early yesterday morning. At 5:56 A.M. Thompson messaged Guidry, his secretary and Rep. Roy Burrell, sponsor of Louisiana's video game bill, matter-of-factly asking for a status report on the case.

Guidry replied by e-mail a few hours later. Included in his update was what appears to be a diplomatically-worded admonition to Thompson to work through channels:

"Waiting on ct decision re prel injunction. Also have issued initial discovery interrogatories re rating system."

"Have received info that someone on your behalf has contacted cops program for support indicating they were working for state of la. Please cease all activity of this type without prior approval of our office. We appreciate your enthusiasm but all activity regarding la state interests must be cleared thru gen foti.
"

Translation: Guidry is waiting for Federal Judge James Brady to rule on the game industry's request for a preliminary injunction. In preparation for arguing the case he has also begun the process of seeking information on how the ESRB rates games.

The "cops program" is believed to be Concerns of Police Survivors, a national organization that provides aid, counseling and assistance to the families of police officers killed in the line of duty. GP readers may recall that Thompson's recent attempt to submit an Amicus Curiae brief to the court was summarily rejected, in part because he had not named on whose behalf he was acting, beyond unspecified law enforcement personnel and education groups. Associating the amicus brief with COPS would appear to be Thompson's attempt to rectify that legal shortcoming.

Thompson's reply to Guidry's e-mail was swift - and harsh.

"You're way, way out of line... I am seeking to be amicus in this case, per the request weeks ago, from the Governor's Office, that I assist in trying to get this law declared constitutional."

"Your office, on the other hand, has thwarted my efforts to help in that regard, most recently by your bizarre request that I not contact COPS to see if it might light (sic) to be my amicus. I have had a relationship with COPS before I ever heard of you all and this bill.
"

Thompson also chided Guidry for not contacting "four experts" suggested by the Miami attorney as potential witnesses in the case. Thompson added, "I have REPEATEDLY asked you and your office to provide me information as to the status of the case, the name of a Louisiana lawyer who might be able to serve as co-counsel for amicus, and also why the court summarily and preliminarily, denied my amicus request... "

Thompson also implies that Guidry's office is not putting forth its maximum effort on the case.

"...There are lives at stake, and your office is acting as if this is some sort of debate over the tax code... Here you are freezing out the guy who wrote the bill..."

Later on Sunday, Thompson copied GamePolitics on a letter which he apparently faxed to Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco. Gov. Blanco, readers may recall, signed the video game bill into law, thus triggering the constitutional challenge by the video game industry. Thompson's fax to the Governor includes:

"...I wrote the bill... I testified... You then signed this bill into law... Terry Ryder of your office specifically asked me... to assist... that this constitutional law would be defended adequately in the face of the violent video game industry's assault upon it in federal court."

Terry Ryder is listed as Gov. Blanco's Executive Counsel on her official website.

"I regret to inform you," Thompson continues, "that... your Attorney General's office has utterly dropped the ball... I would respectfully suggest that you... tell your Attorney General, Mr. Foti, either to do his job or get out of the way so that others can do it for him."

Asked whether he was concerned about burning bridges with Louisiana officials, Thompson's terse reply to GP via e-mail read simply, "There are no bridges."

E-mail requests for comment from Deputy A.G. Guidry, Rep. Burrell, and Exective Counsel Terry Ryder were not answered by press time. In all fairness, their respective offices were closed on Sunday as we assembled this story. GP will, of course, report any comments received from Louisiana officials on this matter.




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(101 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]sir_bissel
2006-08-07 01:17 pm UTC (link)
" before I ever heard of you all and this bill."

I know this isn't how it's meant to sound, but that line makes it sound like the bill existed prior to Thompson -- that is, he came into it rather than writing the bill, as he says.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]terminator44
2006-08-07 04:05 pm UTC (link)
OMGZORS! JT has perfected time travel! :O

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Absolutly Hilarious
[info]yukimurasanada
2006-08-07 01:19 pm UTC (link)
Oh this is sweet. It seems its not just gamers or David Walsh who are tired of Jacks Crap, now even his own former allies have begun to shun him. And I love how jack whines about his AMicus brief. To late jack, Motion denied BITCH! Your not a "friend", not of this court, not of any court. Heres hoping you learn something from this.

Childish antics, name calling, insults, racial slurs, and the dozens of other forms of abuse you tried to use on us, won't work on them either. Sorry buddy, but you lose!

(Reply to this)

bah
[info]l0que
2006-08-07 01:24 pm UTC (link)
I bet its a ploy, so that when the bill fails, it's because they "didn't let him help"

can't he not eff up JUST ONCE so he is seen for what he truly is?

(Reply to this)


[info]muhammed
2006-08-07 01:25 pm UTC (link)
Well it would seem that everyone who gets in bed with Thompson realizes it's a mistake eventually.

The one thing I don't get is what he expects to accomplish by letting us know about this, besides supplying us with more ammo for his endless ridicule.

(Reply to this)

Wow...
[info]skemodan
2006-08-07 01:27 pm UTC (link)
You'd think the whole state of Louisianna shot his mom.

If he were a nuclear reactor, a poke with a stick would blow him to kingdom come. Seriously, has he ever heard of "restraint". I don't understand how this man still has a job. AT ALL! What happened to the bar investigation?

(Reply to this)

HA!
[info]mazinger_z
2006-08-07 01:40 pm UTC (link)
Guess his wife forgot to grind up his pills into his oatmeal this week...

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: HA!
[info]mnementh2230
2006-08-07 02:28 pm UTC (link)
Lol - I was thinking something similar just a few minutes ago... but it's not fit for the public. :)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]trenthowell
2006-08-07 01:47 pm UTC (link)
He needs to stop acting like a little kid when things don't go his way. The law is unconstitutional as it is and theres very little(correction: nothing) to defend on it. This whole case is nothing more than a waste of taxpayers money. When the next hurricane hits and the state needs X amount of money (X being money wasted on this case), then I can say that Jack's "crusade" resulted in damages, and possibly additional deaths, because he "thinks" video games are killers.

No, lawyers with crusades that waste taxpayer dollars that could be better spent on additional police equipment or improving hospitals to save people probably ends up killing more people than Jack's nonexistent killer video games

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Yeah but...
[info]lightwarriorr
2006-08-07 03:05 pm UTC (link)
The sad thing is I don't think when the next hurricane comes along and they need money they aren't going to sit there and realise they wasted it of pointless bills.

They are probably just gonna whine for more money and help.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]razor5, 2006-08-07 08:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lightwarriorr, 2006-08-07 09:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]beardoggx, 2006-08-08 01:44 am UTC

[info]konrad_arflane
2006-08-07 01:49 pm UTC (link)
Wonderful. Jack is like the Terrell Owens of videogames legislation, except without the actual skill and ability.

(Reply to this)


[info]anticron
2006-08-07 01:56 pm UTC (link)
Methinks he thinks to highly of himself; Superman, he is not.

Seriously though, he's a nutball, and his continued antics highlight precisely why no reasonable person should ever have assistance or contact with him.

I wonder precisely how he manages to keep his license with his blatant disregard for anything sane.

(Reply to this)


[info]kajex
2006-08-07 02:06 pm UTC (link)
Wah, wah, wah, your needs, Jacko. He needs to whine when his own needs aren't catered.

"STATUS REPORT!"
"We need to clear it thru procedure."
"... You're way outta line, Burt. Gimme it now."
"... No. O.o;"
"... I'm telling on you."

Later:

"THE A.G. OFFICE IS BEING BAD! MAKE THEM GIVE ME A STATUS REPORT! OR MAKE HIM GO AWAY SO SOMEONE WHO'LL PANDER TO MY BABYISH NEEDS WILL GIVE IT TO ME."

And the expected response will probably be...

"...No. o.o"

(Reply to this)

Thumper's just a pawn
[info]pixelantesanon
2006-08-07 02:11 pm UTC (link)
There Thumper goes again with his inflated ego and sense of self worth.

I know you're reading Thumper. You're a mere pawn. You're not a playmaker, you're a puppet in a game played way above your league. Be glad they allowed you to nibble at the table at all. You're no longer useful, so you're getting dumped. What a surprise.

Thanks for putting it on paper that you wrote the law though. It's nice to know the LA legislators are allowing out-of-state megalomaniacs blowhards to write their bills. That should go well with the voters in the next elections.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Thumper's just a pawn
[info]jesdk
2006-08-07 02:22 pm UTC (link)
"There are no bridges."
Indeed, allies are not needed.

In other words, Jack Thompson just declared himself a One-Man-Army, completely without the need of others to achieve his goals.

Good riddance, maybe this will show all the 'feelgood' politicians how big a retard the man is.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Another failure
[info]mnementh2230
2006-08-07 02:27 pm UTC (link)
"There are no bridges" - well, certainly not anymore. Jack's inability to maintain the facade of civility in the face of adversity saw to that. I suppose we can just add this to the list of Jacks failures - it's getting awefully long, but I saw some room in the right side margin on page nineteen.

Jack, do you ever step back and look at what you're doing? What you're writing to other people? How you approach people? The moment it looks like someone isn't doing EXACTLY what you want, you blow up at them. There are no bridges because you're throwing gasoline and firecrackers everywhere you go. Something I've learned throughout my life is that it is rarely wise to question the ability of someone who is doing a job you have not done. These people are doing many jobs you haven't done, among them being:

Holding public office
Dealing with internal politics
Trying to prepare for a decent, non-circus trial (ok, admittedly you may have done this one, but not in a long damn time)

The bottom line is that you're not an insider, Jack. You don't know the whole story of what's going on in their world, any more than we do. They're dealing with things you've never dealt with, and due to your hillarious rantings to Ms. Reno a while back (blackmail? lesbians?), odds are you never will.

(Reply to this)


[info]slyfoxx
2006-08-07 02:33 pm UTC (link)
It's nice to know Jack still thinks enough of GP and its readers and staff to humor us all by sending his emails out. Thanks, Dennis, for sharing this wonderful amusement with us ^_^

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]gamepolitics
2006-08-07 02:38 pm UTC (link)
well, we have de-emphasized covering Miami Jack for a variety of reasons. However, he is so intimately involved with the Louisiana legislation that we'd be remiss no to cover such a development...

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Wait wait wait - [info]yukimurasanada, 2006-08-07 02:43 pm UTC
Re: Wait wait wait - [info]gamepolitics, 2006-08-07 02:57 pm UTC
Re: Wait wait wait - [info]yukimurasanada, 2006-08-07 03:03 pm UTC
Re: Wait wait wait - [info]thabor, 2006-08-08 02:10 am UTC
Re: Wait wait wait - [info]cecil475, 2006-08-07 03:48 pm UTC
Jack's mistakes
[info]dog_welder
2006-08-07 03:05 pm UTC (link)
Wow. Just wow.

Reading between the lines, here's what it looks like:

1) Jack has his amicus brief shot down in court.

2) Jack tried to have amicus brief reinstated, so approaches COPS to use them to get the brief accepted. In doing so, Jack gives his standard "I'm working for the state of Louisiana" tripe that he usually gives (see just about every previous "case" that Jack has "worked on").

3) COPS approaches Foti or Guidry to verify what Thomson says is true. Find out that Thomson isn't telling the truth AND anger Foti and Guidry in the process.

4) Hilarity ensues.

As usual, Jack shows a complete lack of jurisprudence or understanding in how the court system or government works. How a person can pass a bar test without having the slightest understanding of American Civics 101 is beyond me.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Jack's mistakes
[info]dividebydesu
2006-08-08 02:58 am UTC (link)
Jack's agenda is simple.
1. Make friends and contacts to try to force bills into law
2. Burn said friends after mission is half complete
3. Ridicule people somemore
4. ???
5. PROFIT

5 of course being from royalities and appearances on 60 Minutes, because television, newspaper, and radio is really what he wants, he wants the power of media above anything else, because people listen to media. Except he sucks at even that.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Must be a slow news day...
[info]xlorep_darkhelm
2006-08-07 03:11 pm UTC (link)
If "Jack Thompson is flipping insane" makes the news.

I do understand the relevance of this to the Louisiana law... I just think it's funny that Jack Thompson's insanity still making the front pag on GP. One can only hope that his antics at this point are really becoming more obvious to the people that matter (with regards to these silly laws).

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Must be a slow news day...
[info]gamepolitics
2006-08-07 03:28 pm UTC (link)
actually, I see this as kind of a big story.

If the game law coalition is falling apart in Louisiana, that's news - at least in the arena that GP covers, which is politics/games.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Must be a slow news day... - [info]xlorep_darkhelm, 2006-08-07 03:30 pm UTC
Re: Must be a slow news day... - [info]cecil475, 2006-08-07 03:50 pm UTC
Re: Must be a slow news day... - [info]jythie, 2006-08-07 04:29 pm UTC
HAHAHAHAHAHA
[info]quad9damage
2006-08-07 03:15 pm UTC (link)
HAH.

So I guess Jack "I can do anything I want" Thompson is starting to realize that taking on the game industry isn't such easy money after all, especially when he can't keep himself under control long enough to maintain relationships with people.

I look forward to renting Bully later this year. And I don't give a damn what the crazy lawyer says.

(Reply to this)

I wonder if Jack said something insane today? *click* Oh look!
[info]dustin1986
2006-08-07 03:24 pm UTC (link)
Oh boy, here we go. Jack's upset again, I'm so shocked! The problem is that he thinks that he's the one running the show. He ALWAYS thinks he's running the show. I'm sorry to dissapoint you Jack, but this is not "your" law. YOu have to realize that some things require a group effort and you can't take all the credit for yourself. You can't just call up the Attorney General and tell him how to run things. You're not special, and you don't deserve more respect than everyone else.

I think that the reason Jack is starting to get so upset is because he's starting to realize what everyone else has known all along. Louisiana couldn't care less about this law. All they want is an issue to grandstand about. They know that the law is worthless and that it will never work, they just want to look like they "care about the children". They don't care about this law, and they sure as hell don't care about Jack.

Jack can go ahead and draft a bill for every state in the union if he wants to, it'll never work. They'll put it to a vote, maybe even pass it, but they won't fight for it. Everyone knows that these restrictions are unconstitutional. These bills are just good P.R. for all the scared Soccer Moms out there.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: I wonder if Jack said something insane today? *click* Oh look!
[info]mysticgamer
2006-08-08 01:39 am UTC (link)
You know this is the reason I check regularly, to see how long until Jack snaps.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]the1jeffy
2006-08-07 03:24 pm UTC (link)
There are no bridges.

QFT.

Never were, aren't currently, and never will be. Mr. Thompson summed up the demise of his "career" better than anyone of us ever could. There are no bridges because he is a complete and utter failure. Anyone with clout wants nothing to with him, and he has a lovely trend of treating his allies with as much scorn as his enemies. And will turn on an ally in the blink of an eye. Over nothing, too.

He strikes me as hopelessly childish. And is angry that the big kids won't let him play - he has to sit on the bench and cry, instead. Sad really, that a man into what, his 60's, can't even carry himself with at least a trifling amount of professionalism. I can understand his treatment of us. To him we are non-persons with no real influence, and deserve no respect. He's wrong, of course, but that explains his attitude for gamers. But he treats judges, senators, and other attourneys like inferior morons. Given his track record of half victories (Stern), and utter failures (Cop Killa, Alabama); his superiority complex is not the best way to affect any type of real change. And it is becoming clear that he will never do so.

There are no bridges, indeed.

(Reply to this)


[info]ericseiler
2006-08-07 03:38 pm UTC (link)
Gun = 1
Jack's Foot = 0

Jack literally is the 'Super-happy-fun-ball' of attorneys.

I hereby (preemptively) give Jack's next client, or anyone who takes the man seriously, a Darwin award.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]jchaos
2006-08-08 09:02 am UTC (link)
DO NOT PROVOKE SUPER HAPPY FUN BALL

I'm pretty sure that comparing it to Thompson counts as provokation.

(I also hope I didn't mis-remember the sketch I'm trying to use in the joke.)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]cecil475
2006-08-07 03:40 pm UTC (link)
Looks like Thompson still knows how to tell people what to do. Thinks people will do what ever he wants without asking. I wonder,since this article is about him, if he has tried posting.

- Warren Lewis

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]gamepolitics
2006-08-07 03:42 pm UTC (link)
I think he understands his posts won't be unscreened...

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]trenthowell, 2006-08-07 04:22 pm UTC

[info]ianc14
2006-08-07 03:51 pm UTC (link)
Ah, so thats what hes been busy doing, emailing a lot.

Nice to see "allies" getting fed up with his antics :)

(Reply to this)

Amusing comment and then question.
[info]durlock
2006-08-07 03:53 pm UTC (link)
That picture just makes him look like he's wearing an invisible Dunce Cap and saying 'Oh my God I'm smelly...wee!'

Or maybe it's just me but I think that's really un-flattering, hehe, I like it.

Though, are those words copied from whatever he E-Mailed? I mean, he's a "lawyer" for chrissakes, he should be using at least decent English, I mean, what's with all those Elipses, or did you just use them to cut stuff?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Amusing comment and then question.
[info]gamepolitics
2006-08-07 04:24 pm UTC (link)
I inserted those for.... brevity.

much of his e-mail was edited out for space reasons.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

I see the Circus has come to town...
[info]tollwutig
2006-08-07 03:53 pm UTC (link)
Should have known the Thompson Circus would ensue when he drafted legislation and called it constitutiona.... now where's my popcorn?

(Reply to this)

Jack admits to burning bridges
[info]kincyr
2006-08-07 04:03 pm UTC (link)
Asked whether he was concerned about burning bridges with Louisiana officials, Thompson's terse reply to GP via e-mail read simply, "There are no bridges."
Well, not anymore. Seeing as Jack burned them all down. Afterall, he said "There are no bridges.", not "There were no bridges."

(Reply to this)

With friends like these....
[info]jythie
2006-08-07 04:07 pm UTC (link)
Jack seems to be slowly alienating his allies.

Have there been any other cases besides this and the National Institute on Media and the Family breaking ties with him?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: With friends like these....
[info]gamepolitics
2006-08-07 04:23 pm UTC (link)
...well, rather quickly alienating in this case.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: With friends like these.... - [info]jythie, 2006-08-07 04:27 pm UTC
Re: With friends like these.... - [info]kajex, 2006-08-08 01:58 am UTC
Re: With friends like these.... - [info]terminator44, 2006-08-08 01:11 pm UTC

(101 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…