Game Politics ([info]gamepolitics) wrote,
@ 2006-08-06 08:55:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:doug lowenstein, e3, esa, kentia hall, mary dolaher

E3 Cancellation - What the Little Fish Were Told

If you were Larry Probst, CEO of Electronic Arts, the news about E3's shift to a more "intimate" format might well have been delivered to your palatial estate by a very proper English butler carrying a silver tray bearing a personal note from Doug Lowenstein.

But then again, Probst didn't need to be told. In fact, it's a good bet that he dictated the change to Lowenstein. From news reports, it's pretty clear that EA wanted E3 dead - the glitzy, panoramic E3 we had come to know and love, anyway.

What, then, of the small exhibitors, those lonely occupants of Kentia Hall (seen at left), the Los Angeles Convention Center's basement equivalent of a Siberian gulag? Here's what E3's small-time exhibitors were told by the ESA:

"Dear Valued E3Expo Exhibitor,

As you may have read in the enclosed Press Release, the 2007 E3Expo has been officially cancelled. As the industry has evolved and matured over the past 12 years, the needs of the exhibitors and key attendees have also changed. To address this change, the Entertainment Software Association (ESA) has announced a new event tentatively scheduled for July 2007.

Details of the event have not been finalized at this time, however our vision and goal is to create a more intimate climate for personalized meetings and product demonstrations. The ESA will announce additional details and information in the ensuing weeks and months.

We would like to take this opportunity to extend our sincere and profound gratitude for your past support of this event. It has been exciting and rewarding to see the growth and significance of this industry mirrored on the exhibit floor of the E3Expo through the years. We look forward to many more years of industry growth, vitality and opportunity.

Yours sincerely,
Mary Dolaher
Vice President
"

GamePolitics received a copy of the ESA letter from a Kentia Hall exhibitor. Such firms stand to lose the most in the E3 reshuffle. As Jospeh Olin, President of the Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences told GameSpot recently, "Thinking about "winners and losers," the smaller, specialty companies who introduce their products at E3 in Kentia Hall... will find it more difficult to reach 'buyers' or to create buzz about their products or services."

E3 thus ends, in the words of T.S. Eliot, "...not with a bang, but a whimper."




(40 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Sad as it is,
[info]yukimurasanada
2006-08-06 11:47 am UTC (link)
It's needed, E3 had simply gone to the point that it was jsut to big to handle in it's current format. The only other choice they had would have been to make it open to the public, and that would have absolutley ended it. going from 50 grand in attendance to something like 500 thousand? this was needed, but, sad none the less. I agree, the small exhibitours will be hit the hardest, but if there wise, they would be well served to contact the Boys at penny arcade about Pax, I'm sure Pax would be happy to exhibit them if possible.

On an off topic note, a little jab to jack thompson. hey jack, Penny arcade seems to not only still be free, but now has a it's own expo serving thousands upon thousands. What does jack thompson got? Stinging rebukes from judges stating, in clear english, "Games are protected Speech", despite All of jack thompsons "they are not speech" bull shit.

Sorry jack, as they say, things may change. Gamers will always win, the industry will never die.

You lose!

(Reply to this)


[info]eusisnaphtali
2006-08-06 12:06 pm UTC (link)
That's one of my biggest worries. Even if they manage to get a showing at some place like PAX, they're the ones who need to find buyers, unlike companies like Nintendo and Sony, or even smaller ones like Atlus. Probably could've did the necessary culling with a budget restriction on /everyone/ and being more picky about who may/may not come in.

Then again, maybe those hotels really /do/ provide all the space necessary when those two are combined. We'll know come July.

(Reply to this)

I must not be understanding anything.
[info]lightwarriorr
2006-08-06 12:29 pm UTC (link)
I keep hearing E3 is dead some places and other places I keep hearing it's just going to change and evolve to a smaller expo.

Is it dead or is just changing?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: I must not be understanding anything.
[info]gamepolitics
2006-08-06 01:09 pm UTC (link)
"dead" as we know it...

the new "intimate" E3 will be a completely different animal.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: I must not be understanding anything.
[info]lightwarriorr
2006-08-06 01:12 pm UTC (link)
Well...I guess that's sad.

All I really cared about what the press conferences at day one of every E3 for what to look forward too in the next 365 days.


I'm hoping there will still be some kind of press conference.

I remember reading Nintendo confirmed to be at next "E3"....after the changes.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: I must not be understanding anything.
[info]cecil475
2006-08-06 07:34 pm UTC (link)
gamepolitics said:

"dead" as we know it...
the new "intimate" E3 will be a completely different animal.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Maybe I'm just not getting it. But how diffrent of an animal are we talking. How do you think 2007 E3 will differ from 2006 E3? Will Gamespot and IGN give the same amount of coverage? (since I can't be there in person.)

- Warren Lewis

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: I must not be understanding anything.
[info]gamepolitics
2006-08-06 08:10 pm UTC (link)
picture this:

60,000 attendees in a sprawling three-hall circus of light and sounds that was probably the equivalent of 10+ football fields in size, maybe bigger.

That was E3 2006. 2007 will be more like 5000 attendees in meeting rooms in a couple of large hotels, going to talks and demos by developers. very subdued, by comparison.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: I must not be understanding anything.
[info]xlorep_darkhelm
2006-08-07 03:12 pm UTC (link)
With probably litle to no press coverage. It will be a completely different animal, like you said.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: I must not be understanding anything.
[info]gamepolitics
2006-08-07 03:26 pm UTC (link)
...not sure about the press coverage.

I think there will be plenty, but only from the major websites and mainstream print media.

The smaller web sites won't get invites, I would imagine.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: I must not be understanding anything.
[info]eusisnaphtali
2006-08-07 11:01 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, I think as far as coverage from big sites go, it'll be exactly the same as before, just without as many gameplay videos or pictures of flashy booths. 5,000 people is a lot though, so maybe they'll manage to at least get one or two people from smaller sites - just that they can't all go themesleves, and have to be significant to some degree.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Will it really hurt small developers?
[info]blitzfitness
2006-08-06 12:55 pm UTC (link)
I can understand the buckets of money that large companies will save by not having to create a powerhouse booth at the convention center, but doesn't this also save money for the little guy? They had to cover expenses not as large, but likely more of a pocket burner than they would like to bring materials, maybe fly to LA, etc. Plus, the fact that people can download demos in the comfort of their own home rather than catch a 1 minute video on a big screen would seem to mean that E3 was behind on the times. Keep in mind, however, that I've never attended, which means I never had a need to grab an interview with an artist or somesuch.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Will it really hurt small developers?
[info]traiklin
2006-08-06 04:21 pm UTC (link)
you know, this could actually help small developers in the long run.

The reasons you mention are just one of the factors but here's another.

When E3 rolls around, how often do you visit a gaming site? (Say IGN or Gamespot) how often do they talk about the games seen in Kentia Hall?

To be honest I never knew there was such a place, I only learned about it either last year or the year before when I was watching X-play and they had sent someone down to there and even then they didn't really show much of anything, so I just thought it was a place for the cosplayers to go.

What they need is their own expo, let the big developers have their own show where they will still fight over who has the bigger booth (cause you know that won't change unless the ESA dictates how big a booth can be) while these small developers can have their own little booths at their show for people to actually see the games and remember them.

The couple of times Xplay used to go through the booths at E3 I remember the Xbox "Entrance" would disorient you with all the flashing lights around you, the Sony booth would knock your ass down with the pumping sound (not to mention the flashing lights) Nintendo would just distract you with something that looked interesting, then there's Tecmo who had to be shut down twice thanks to the horny guys who could of cared less what game they were promoting (for all they knew it could of been a game about Nazi's and how great they are but they wouldn't of known or cared).

So in the end I hope the small developers go to other shows or get their own version of E3 so people will actually get to see the games they made, invite Publishers (naturally) and journalists only for the first two days then on the third (if they go for three days) then on the third when they have gotten their fill you can have it open to the public so they can see the games first hand.

God knows how many games IGN Gamespot or a lot of other sites don't report on cause their in the Kentia Hall (which seems to be hell for them to even THINK about going down into...I wonder if those are the games shown "behind closed doors" all the time).

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Yes, it will.
[info]getwellgamer
2006-08-07 10:31 am UTC (link)
For less than $5,000, including travel, hotels, and booth construction, we were able to meet with and interact with a worldwide audience for three days. No hotel meeting or specialty conference will ever be able to replicate that kind of exposure for that little price. It's the small developers that are hurt most from this, not the big publishers who have PR bugets several orders of magnitude greater than our entire yearly operation budget.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Will it really hurt small developers?
[info]xlorep_darkhelm
2006-08-07 03:19 pm UTC (link)
A single point of contact & reference, where everyone involved in the biz would interact, and see each other could only help the small-time developers. Now with that gone, they don't have that particularly powerful means to show off their wares and get the public's interest.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]brooklynknight
2006-08-06 01:18 pm UTC (link)
IMO these exhibiters have much to gain by going to Gencon (SoCal and Indy) and PAX...

The 3 biggest conventions of "Gamers" in the united states remaining. While their past focus has not been on Electronic Gaming, they've always welcomed video game and computer game exhibitors and These cons have a lot to gain from them!

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]ironmaus
2006-08-07 09:34 pm UTC (link)
...which is why PAX 2006 will essentially triple in size from this year when they move from Bellevue's Meydenbauer center to the Washington State Convention Center in downtown Seattle.

As for Gencon, videogames are such an afterthought there that I don't believe there will be much change.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]brooklynknight
2006-08-07 11:27 pm UTC (link)
In recent years they've been growing. I dont know a single Pen and PAper gamer who DOESNT also play a shitload of Console/Computer/Video games..

Its exactly the market they want and Gencon needs to grow.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

E3Expo
[info]sir_bissel
2006-08-06 01:26 pm UTC (link)
Didn't the third E mean Expo anyway? So it's the Expo Expo? *blink*

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: E3Expo
[info]samuraiknight
2006-08-06 04:37 pm UTC (link)
Another company already owned the trademark "E3", so the ESA had to add the "Expo" qualifier to distinguish itself.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: E3Expo
[info]eusisnaphtali
2006-08-06 04:55 pm UTC (link)
Apparantly. I thought it was a rename when I looked at VGCats. Now I think whoever's deciding what to call it is/was just stupid as hell and decided that people needed that extra Expo at the end, and that simply calling it 'E3' wasn't enough.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

hmmm
[info]enmitywithin
2006-08-06 01:46 pm UTC (link)
did I not hear about how much swag they were always giving out?

perhaps E3 could have survived if they made some intelligent decisions, like not handing so much free/useless stuff out.

(Reply to this)


[info]jargon_john
2006-08-06 01:46 pm UTC (link)
This is like a terrible nightmare. I still can't believe E3 is dead. And I've always wanted to go to it.

Will never get the chance now...

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]kurisu7885
2006-08-06 04:45 pm UTC (link)
Never woudl have had a chance anyway? E3 was like this big fun event where Catman was standing outside taunting us saying "you can't come."

And if EA was movign to have E3 shut down, I am getting suspicious of them, as they have been brutally tryign to rule the industry with an iron fist.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]jargon_john
2006-08-06 11:03 pm UTC (link)
I'm in school now trying to break into the industry. If I were to succed one day, I'd hopefully be able to go to E3.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]dustin1986
2006-08-06 10:30 pm UTC (link)
Maybe all hope isn't lost. In a year or two you might see something else show up to fill the void that E3 left. Heck, they might even make some kind of show that's open to the public, sort of like the Tokyo Game Show.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]jargon_john
2006-08-06 10:57 pm UTC (link)
I hope so...

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Props, yo.
[info]ryukisargi
2006-08-06 04:09 pm UTC (link)
With the apparent demise of E3, there are many a gamer that will rise a glass to them this night, and with this... reshuffling, newer companies will be simply lost in the said shuffle.

Dennis, I raise my glass to you tonight, this is the best piece I've seen you write in the year or so I've been browsing your site.

The T.S. Eliot quote just... got me.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Props, yo.
[info]gamepolitics
2006-08-06 06:03 pm UTC (link)
thanks.... mom.

;-)

glad you liked.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Props, yo.
[info]ryukisargi
2006-08-06 06:35 pm UTC (link)
Anytime.

Don't forget to eat your greens! ;)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]grimm24
2006-08-06 06:35 pm UTC (link)
Eh not suprising.

EA sucks hard. With their greed and inability to treat employees like human beings EA is quickly becoming the Enron of the game industry

(Reply to this)


[info]ss_ebonclaw
2006-08-06 10:04 pm UTC (link)
Here's a question.. would E3 have died if they did something to, maybe.. put a cap on just how much you can show? Like, how much floor space you take up, for instance?

Or maybe if EA just hadn't bitched about how EVERYONE ELSE had more attention than they do. Really, that's the root cause of all this. This year, EA had barely any attention, by comparison, for all the money they threw into it. Reason for this? Same thing they do every year, try to show off new football! And, because EA can't change their ways and do something innovative, when they claim that E3 is causing industry losses, they just mean it's costing them money.

Hell, MS had more coverage and publicity than EA had.

Maybe what they'll really do next year, is hold E3 as it's been, and just tell EA to stay out of it? You'll see costs come down by a huge margin because people won't be trying to get their stuff seen and heard, over the blinding lights and blaring music coming from EA's freakshow.

And unlike what grimm24 suggests, I don't think EA is becming the Enron of the game industry, I think they're becoming the Microsoft of the game industry. Trying to dictate standards and force the industry to move how THEY want, even though they never release anything but clones of crappy products with a fresh coat of paint and some glitter glue, and Will Wright games. They don't challenge anything, beyond buying and shelving anything that would threaten them, from a smaller, unprotected company.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]gamepolitics
2006-08-06 10:19 pm UTC (link)
thing about EA and E3 is... nobody held a gun to their head and made them buy the primo floor space at the entrance to South Hall. Nobody made them lug that all-around circular screen thingie into the show. If they overspent, they overspent and it's their own fault.

I well recall Peter Moore hosting a bare bones - and I mean bare bones Sega press conference the year they killed off the Dreamcast and went software-only. Sega had exactly nothing at the show that year except for Peter talking. Now that's the way to save money.

This probably has something to do with having a bad year cuz of console transition, wasteful NFL license fees, forced to treat workers better in the wake of the EA Spouse class-action suit and, of course, Larry's $13 mill payday.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]ss_ebonclaw
2006-08-06 11:35 pm UTC (link)
Well of course no one held a gun to their head and made them do all that! But they couldn't -possibly- have been at fault, now could they? Oh, no! And if EA isn't the ones t fault, then who would it be, if not everyone else who was trying to get some spotlight, away from the blinding ones coming from the EA booths.

Remember, it's never their fault, so it -must- be someone else's.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]grimm24
2006-08-07 04:36 am UTC (link)
Good point

However god forbid EA actually admit to their own faults.

They're to busy making slight tweaks to next years madden so that they can spend 90% of the budget on buying new cars or whatnot. Seriously they dont even have to advertise for Madden, because they know that a bunch of sports fanatics will buy it even if its the same old thing.

Oh course when another company challanges the mighty EA, they pull the rug out from under their feet and make it so that only they can make a NFL game or whatnot.

EA is a picture perfect image of what the game industry is bound to become. A giant wad of corruption just like the music industry and hollywood.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Sucks.
[info]getwellgamer
2006-08-06 11:30 pm UTC (link)
As a fellow Kentia Denizen, I can say that I and the other barely-there companies are the ones that stand to lose the most by this transition. There is literally no other event where you can get worldwide exposure to thousands of people that might otherwise never get a chance to see your product or service in the course of their normal duties. EA and Sony and Activision mght be able to rent out hotels and conference rooms for their demos, but what about the rest of us who can't just call up GameSpy or IGN and say "Hey, come down for a chat?"

This does nothing but hurt smaller independant developers. If the convention is getting too pricey, that's their own fault. Floor space prices haven't changed- it's your own fault for dropping a $20M booth on top of it.

(Reply to this)


[info]_rejected_
2006-08-07 04:04 am UTC (link)
It sucks if E3's death kills the opportunity for small companies to get their product out there, but I'm not sad to see E3 go.

(Reply to this)

My proposition: Pack PAX
[info]mrpat___
2006-08-07 05:12 am UTC (link)
the Penny-Arcade Expo has been growing in popularity since it came out. While my thoughts generally never succeed in such a category, I think the small companies should try and work something with the PE crew to both make their expo the biggest thing while showing off what we're awaiting each year. Kill two birds, you know.

and yes, I'm aware its not that simple, before anyone jumps on me ;)

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Differences
[info]ironmaus
2006-08-08 12:19 am UTC (link)
As someone who's been to E3 and been staff for PAX, I've got to point out that they are fundamentally different things. (I do this as a means of furthering the idea of how it's not that simple not to attack you for the idea.)

The E3 Expo was primarily a press and publisher affair. It was for smaller companies to get noticed and hopefully have their software picked up. It was for bigger companies to show off their wares and pick up stuff from the smaller companies. It was business. If you made a big stink at E3 it's because you wanted to attract press who would then, in turn, alert the public.

PAX is for gamers. We go there to play games. Yes, there's an exhibition hall for gamers to see what's coming up but it's not the industry showing off to each other and the press.

Sure there will be some bigger companies that will seek out some attention at PAX now that E3 is dead but the majority opinion is right...

- PAX will not become E3
- Little companies will be hurt by this

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Dear Valued E3Expo Bastards
[info]zippydsmlee
2006-08-07 07:22 pm UTC (link)
Simpleifed Translation

"Dear Valued E3Expo Bastard,
As you may have read in the enclosed Press Release, the 2007 E3Expo has been officially cancelled. As the industry has evolved and matured over the past 12 years, the needs of the larger bastards..errr custmers have changed and thus no longer wish to be one up by smaller and unknowen bastards.

this has been a service annocment of the ESA were our motto is less serives less serive LESS SERIVCE!!"



or soemthign liek that.....what was his name on One peice the guy that kept calling custmers bastards the alrge bald cook a few eps befor they got sanji to join...mmmmm
I read it and he came to mind 0-o

(Reply to this)


[info]uglyface2
2006-08-10 03:16 am UTC (link)
Without E3 and Kentia Hall, where would Guitar Hero be? I can just about guarantee that Gamespot would have had more important things to worry about than a game some dance-mat manufacturer published, even if Harmonix helped develop it.

It's just getting harder and harder to keep an eye out for gaming gems these days. I can appreciate that large companies provide the bulk of game sales (and in many cases, they are decent games), but there's no reason to crowd out the little guys.

(Reply to this)


(40 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…