Game Politics ([info]gamepolitics) wrote,
@ 2006-07-21 14:40:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:daily kos, democrats, hillary clinton, iraq, joe lieberman, taxes

Hillary Eying Video Game Tax?

According to an un-sourced story in Kotaku, New York Sen. Hillary Clinton (D) is mulling a tax on video games.

If that's true, Sen. Clinton is in noteworthy - if not especially good - company. Advocating a game tax would align her with the likes of failed Texas gubernatorial candidate Star Locke as the only politicians in recent memory to advocate a special tariff on our favorite pastime.

As the Kotaku story tells it, the tax would go to some type of child advocacy program. Although we'd rather see some kind of attribution, Kotaku editor Brian Crecente got it right last year regarding ESA president Doug Lowenstein's secret Hillary fund-raising breakfast, so methinks his Hillary contacts have history on their side.

Meanwhile, Philadelphia Daily News columnist/blogger Will Bunch takes Hillary to task in a piece entitled Never Mind the Potholes, Hillary Continues Down the Lieberman Road.

The Lieberman headline refers to the Connecticut senator who is widely perceived by Democrats to have gotten too cozy with President Bush, especially on the the war in Iraq. The three-term incumbent faces a difficult August 8th primary in which he currently trails his opponent by five points.

Bunch's story deals with Hillary's seeming obsession with trivial issues like video games and advertising, while failing to step up on the big ones, like, say, Iraq. Bunch notes that A-list liberal blog The Daily Kos ran the results of a straw poll yesterday which showed Hillary finishing seventh, trailing, among others, Sen. Russ Feingold, Gen. Wesley Clark, "No Freakin' Clue" and "Other."

Want to talk about it? You can discuss this story via the "comments" feature (click below), or in the new GamePolitics Forums...




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]dutch_gamer
2006-07-21 07:13 pm UTC (link)
As if 60 bucks for a next-gen game isn't enough already. I am so glad I don't live in America.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]gamepolitics
2006-07-21 07:25 pm UTC (link)
wait - so maybe the Xbox 360 game pricing is already some kind of nefarious Hillary game tax...

Grrrrr....

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Don't bash our politics too quickly - [info]father_time89, 2006-07-21 09:11 pm UTC
Re: Don't bash our politics too quickly - [info]dustin1986, 2006-07-21 10:30 pm UTC
Re: Don't bash our politics too quickly - [info]gatz111085, 2006-07-21 10:40 pm UTC
Re: Don't bash our politics too quickly - [info]mjolnirjack, 2006-07-24 02:33 pm UTC

[info]thaddeusrrboyd
2006-07-21 07:15 pm UTC (link)
While Kos has had a strong impact on the Lieberman race, I'd take its readership's viewers on Hillary with a grain of salt -- those readers are largely far left and don't represent the mainstream views of the Democratic Party, where Hillary is still considered the current frontrunner for the nomination in '08.

(For the record, I'm what most Americans would call far-left too, and absolutely despise Hillary. But my opinions are seldom in line with the mainstream party's. My vote in the '04 primaries was Kucinich -- and he came in, what, 7th out of 9?)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]gamepolitics
2006-07-21 07:24 pm UTC (link)
ya know, if you just went on the issues, Kucinich would be the man...

Sadly, he's not electable at that level.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Screwballing
[info]kharne83
2006-07-21 07:48 pm UTC (link)
Personally, I'm just waiting for the "use of air" tax to set in.

(Reply to this)

this just proves me even more correct than before
[info]enmitywithin
2006-07-21 08:18 pm UTC (link)
Christopher Walken for 2008 president!

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: this just proves me even more correct than before
[info]dustin1986
2006-07-21 10:35 pm UTC (link)
Will Ferrel as his running mate! They should base their campaign around tax breaks for the cowbell industry.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: this just proves me even more correct than before - [info]curiousthompson, 2006-07-22 02:39 am UTC

[info]boffo97
2006-07-21 08:20 pm UTC (link)
We would probably see such a tax shot down on unconstitionality. Certainly people would scream if just all movies were taxed and not all other forms of expression, or just all books.

And isn't there a law against using taxation power as a means of censorship? (Which is what stops a 5 million percent tax on pornography for example)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]father_time89
2006-07-21 09:08 pm UTC (link)
Well we can't if this tax is going to be used as censorship because we don't know
a. An approximate rate for the tax (i.e. whether it be a 1% tax or 30% tax)
or
b. whther or not this will only apply to violent or sexually explicit video games.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]boffo97, 2006-07-21 10:55 pm UTC
you dont know the half of it... - [info]diceman82, 2006-07-22 06:12 am UTC
Re: you dont know the half of it... - [info]jamesweis, 2006-07-22 12:29 pm UTC

[info]ironmaus
2006-07-21 08:23 pm UTC (link)
I hate to say it but she's losing my vote every time she opens her mouth. All this running to the middle and taking up small battles that I couldn't care less about.

I was so excited about the idea of a strong Democratic woman in the White House that other candidates would have had to work twice as hard to get my attention. Now, I'm so let down by her that I've started actively shopping around.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]grls_r_gamers_2
2006-07-21 09:32 pm UTC (link)
I'm a democrat and a woman, and I REALLY wanted to she someone with both those traits in office. However, she's just being a bitch now. There are more important things to worry about.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]lightwarriorr, 2006-07-22 01:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ironmaus, 2006-07-22 09:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jamesweis, 2006-07-22 12:24 pm UTC

[info]jamesweis
2006-07-21 08:31 pm UTC (link)
New York's had a game tax related bill floating around for a few years now. What's really disturbing in these bills are the "justifications", which are skewed, flawed, and tunnel visioned to say the least.

(Reply to this)


[info]automancer
2006-07-21 09:18 pm UTC (link)
As much as I would want to see a woman president, simply because it would be historically ground-breaking, I really don't want it to be Sen. Clinton right now, of course, 2008 is two years away, a lot can change in two years.

-Auto

(Reply to this)

About Hillary
[info]rachelo
2006-07-21 09:21 pm UTC (link)
Hillary has always been just left of center--she was a young Republican and campaigned for Barry Goldwater. It's not surprising that she supports Liebermann so much. I think the real reason why she's reaching for an association between video games and youth violence is because she's spent so much time working with abused children and women and she's grasping at straws to find a solution. I'd vote for her over the next GOP candidate, but I hope she builds a stronger platform than this.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: About Hillary
[info]dog_welder
2006-07-23 09:50 pm UTC (link)
Hillary's "just" left of center? If you just go by her talking points, you'd think she was pretty much a moderate. If you go by her voting record the only Senators who vote more liberally both reside in Massachussetts.

I honestly don't believe she'll get the nomination. She's far too polarizing, even in her own party. The only reason she's polling well is she's really the only Dem thought to be running for 2008 right now. I'm pretty sure you'll see Edwards and Kerry in the hunt again. Gore might make another run, but I don't see him as electable.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: About Hillary - [info]gamepolitics, 2006-07-24 02:25 am UTC

[info]typhoid
2006-07-21 11:34 pm UTC (link)
...

I can't see how it is legal to put a tax on something to benefit something unrelated. The video games I buy go to ME, not kids. And I'm quite far from a minor. A tax on games NOT rated M or Adults Only would be more logical in that regard, as conceivably THOSE games could be going to kids.

GADS... It's like putting a tax on fruit rollups to benefit Red Pandas.

(Reply to this)


[info]grimm24
2006-07-21 11:57 pm UTC (link)
For someone who obviously wants to become president, she isnt helping her case here considering nearly anyone who leans towards the right hates her and now she is making a fool of herself even more

Heck I will be suprised if she even gets re-elected this year

(Reply to this)

bunch of thoughts rolled into one:
[info]mrpat___
2006-07-22 01:40 am UTC (link)
Hillary: Bad.

Feingold/Clark in 08: Good. Very good actually.

Lieberman: We need new blood in Connecticut. I would run myself if I had loads of money to blow on campaigns, and all the free time in the world.It would probably be fun. In short though: NEXT!

Game Tax: As retarded as lawyers in Coral Gables, FL

That about covers it.

(Reply to this)

Sigh...
[info]froggersrevenge
2006-07-22 02:34 am UTC (link)
And to think, I was going to vote for her.

(Reply to this)


[info]curiousthompson
2006-07-22 02:40 am UTC (link)
Oh god, I just realized that Hillary looks like she was posed in Garry's Mod.

(Reply to this)


[info]i_love_catgirls
2006-07-22 03:11 am UTC (link)
As much as I hate to admit it, she's probably still going to get my vote over whichever Republican is running in 08.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]gamepolitics
2006-07-22 09:34 am UTC (link)
...IF she gets the nomination...

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]the1jeffy, 2006-07-23 03:12 pm UTC

[info]jargon_john
2006-07-22 04:05 am UTC (link)
That picture of her looks like a toy...

(Reply to this)

Hmm, sounds fishy.
[info]lordlundar
2006-07-22 04:16 am UTC (link)
I see this as another angle to an anti-game bill being done. If the tax goes through, it could be pushed as games being unsafe and then the bills fly up.

(Reply to this)


[info]jdsalmon
2006-07-22 04:40 am UTC (link)
i call bullshit on this story until it shows up in other venues with actual sources.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]gamepolitics
2006-07-22 09:34 am UTC (link)
well, Crecente is pretty reliable, IMO

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]jdsalmon
2006-07-22 04:44 am UTC (link)
also, i wouldn't buy into the O'reilly bullshit line that DailyKos is "far-left". Trying to cast your opponent's views as extremist and unthinkable is a cheap-ass tactic. Until the DailyKos folks start going on in every post about how the government should own all the means of production, it's pretty safe to say that the "far-left" is consigned to like that one chick you see wandering around on campus and her creepy friend she's always with. They always seem to be reading "MIM Notes" or some shit.

(Reply to this)

oh lord
[info]theshroomguy
2006-07-22 06:27 am UTC (link)
The sheer stupidity of this hurts my brain. Taxing video games is like taxing how much dogs shit in our public parks.

(Reply to this)

Tools
[info]nightwng2000
2006-07-22 10:53 am UTC (link)
Let's see:

Game laws to restrict sales. Nope, not a tool.
Game laws to equate violent games with porn. Nope, no tool there.
Federal legislation to have media researched by the CDC. Nope, no tools there.
Game laws to have judges/juries decide what is or is not appropriate for for other people's children. Nope, no tools there.
Taxing video games and giving the tax to child advocacy groups. Nope, no tools there.

Ya know, with all the chatter about some parents having a hard time understanding ratings and not being able to make informed choices, I see absolutely NO tools to help EDUCATE those parents to make their own decisions. Yee talks about "harried parents", so make a law that decides FOR the parent. The NY AG talks bluntly about having the government decide FOR the parents. A recent Virginia politician talks about how he's a parent and how there should be legislation to do his job for him. NC, LA, and others using Thompson's folly... er... law to give the power of the decision to judges and/or juries to decide for parents.

Yet, time and again, there appears that sound bite "parents need the tools to make appropriate decisions...", in one form or another. So where are these tools? They certainly aren't coming from the politicians or the likes of John Bruce Thompson, as noted above.

Yet we know, KNOW, that the resources for parents to become informed exist. So where are all the tools to educate the parents about those resources? Parents can make the decision for themselves. It is their right to make decisions for their own children. Even if those decisions don't quite jibe with the beliefs of other parents or individuals. Perhaps it is THAT fact that the politicians and others intentionally don't try to make real tools to educate parents. Because it would mean parents could make informed decisions for themselves rather than be dictated to by those others. Must really get under the craw of those who want to dictate to other people that their beliefs really AREN'T the superior beliefs that they believe them to be.

Perhaps that is why we don't see the push for REAL tools to educate the lesser informed parents.

nightwng2000

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Tools
[info]slyfoxx
2006-07-22 02:23 pm UTC (link)
Good point. We could have stores like Eb (or the electronics section in Walmart, etc) keep pamphlets about the ESRB and what the ratings mean at the door to the store/section. If that isn't a tool, I don't know what is... other than playing a recorded explanations of the ratings over the store's PA system.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Tools - [info]the1jeffy, 2006-07-23 03:15 pm UTC
Re: Tools - [info]mendror, 2006-07-25 09:16 pm UTC

[info]ninjagaiden
2006-07-22 11:20 am UTC (link)
I'm really not looking forward to the 2008 elections.

Canada is sounding better every day.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]grimm24
2006-07-23 07:06 am UTC (link)
We need to get Will Wright to run for President

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]gamepolitics, 2006-07-23 09:44 am UTC
Hillary continues to guarantee defeat in 2008
[info]beardoggx
2006-07-22 02:31 pm UTC (link)
Nothing more needs to be said. Typical tax and spend liberal trying to disguise herself as a centrist.

She'll choke on this tax idea.

(Reply to this)

One thing I've been noticing on this thread.
[info]terminator44
2006-07-23 02:17 pm UTC (link)
A lot of people seem to assume that no matter who the Democrats choose for the 2008 election, the Republican candidate will be worse. I shouldn't have to remind you all that Bush can't run for re-election because of term limits, nor should I have to point out that that not all Republicans are as bad as him. Who knows, maybe they'll find someone half-decent, we don't know because they don't seem to have anyone in mind at this time.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: One thing I've been noticing on this thread.
[info]the1jeffy
2006-07-23 03:21 pm UTC (link)
Great point. It only takes a president as unpopular as Bush to make the Democrats seem the saviours of the world.

And the GOP frontrunners are staying quiet right now, because their man is at historically low popularity. Normally, a party frontrunner would have the current President stand behind him. Who wants that stigma on a campaign in this case?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: One thing I've been noticing on this thread. - [info]terminator44, 2006-07-23 05:18 pm UTC
Re: One thing I've been noticing on this thread. - [info]kincyr, 2006-07-23 10:21 pm UTC
Oh darn
[info]sovanyiop4
2006-07-25 12:25 am UTC (link)
She may have just lost everyone I know's vote (poor college students + video game tax!?)

(Reply to this)


Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…