Game Politics ([info]gamepolitics) wrote,
@ 2006-07-14 06:32:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:bethesda, elder scrolls iv, esrb, interviews, maeyanie, modders, mods, oblivion, sex in games

GP Exclusive - Interview with Modder behind Oblivion Controversy

It wasn't nearly Hot Coffee-level, but the ESRB's decision to re-rate The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion rocked the video game world when it was announced on May 3rd of this year.

As the ESRB would have it, the Oblivion decision was based upon "more detailed depictions of blood and gore than were considered in the original rating... as well as the presence in the PC version of the game of a locked-out art file that, if accessed by using an apparently unauthorized third party tool, allows the user to play the game with topless versions of female characters."

At the time there was much debate in the gaming community over the ESRB's action. The Elder Scrolls series enjoys an almost reverential status among fans of role-playing games. For its part, developer Bethesda went along with the decision, although a company press release expressed frustration with the ESRB, saying, "Bethesda Softworks made what it believes was a full, accurate, and comprehensive submission on Oblivion to the ESRB months before the game's release... Nothing was hidden from the ratings agency."

So what really happened?

GamePolitics has tracked down Maeyanie, the mysterious modder who created the topless Oblivion mod. Maeyanie is a bit photo-shy, but has allowed us to publish a 3-D self-portrait (seen at left). GP Correspondent Colin "Jabrwock" McInnes reconstructs the Oblivion controversy with Maeyanie in this revealing interview:

CM: First off, I just wanted to thank you for letting GamePolitics talk to you about the controversy surrounding The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion.

Maeyanie: You're welcome.

CM: I guess we could start with some questions about you and your background. Where are you from?

Maeyanie: This is one I'm going to have to not answer. Let's leave it at "not USA."

CM: What kinds of games are you into? What are your favorite recent titles?

Maeyanie: I'm into a lot of things. RPG's with a captivating story are my favorite by far, but I play strategy and some sim games too. Recently there hasn't been a whole lot of great stuff (with the notable exceptions of Oblivion and Dreamfall: The Longest Journey), so lately I've been playing some slightly older stuff like X3, Supreme Ruler 2010, and Silent Hunter III. When I'm not in an MMO, at least... I'm seen in EverQuest II frequently and Star Wars Galaxies rarely.

CM: How did you get started in modding?

Maeyanie: With The Sims 1, actually. I wanted to make things different - I did, and just kinda kept going from there.

CM: Have you modded many games? What games, and what kind of mods?

Maeyanie: A fair number, yeah, but most of them I haven't released publicly. Some of them are on my website. I dug up a few old mods (mostly never before released) and posted them there. As for what kind, usually I just find things I don't like and make them the way I do like them. Or find things I think would be neat, and add them. There's been a few nude patches, since personally I find it more offensive to be treated like a 6-year-old than to see people naked, but also clothes, scripts, commands, stuff like that. A lot of it depends on the game.

CM: What would you consider your skill level of programming? Basic, intermediate, expert, 1337 h@X0Rz?

Maeyanie: Well, that depends on the area really. I'm pretty good at certain things, basically anything on Linux which doesn't use a GUI, such as servers and stuff. I'm sort of working on writing a MUD, I know it's a bit outdated in the days of MMO games, but they still have a cult following.

CM: Ah MUDs. I spent many sleepless nights in first year university playing those... What is the airspeed velocity of an un-laden swallow... er never mind.

Maeyanie: African or European?

CM: Okay, now on to the infamous Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion mod! What was your original intent behind the mod. Were you looking for Easter eggs, or trying to add new content?

Maeyanie: Trying to add new content. I was basically hoping they had done something like most games do, and paste underwear right on the skin texture. They didn't, so I first tried making the underwear texture transparent. That didn't work either. Then I changed the top mesh to create what ended up being released.

CM: Why only topless models? Why not full frontal nudity? Did you make this decision before you started work on the mod, or afterwards?

Maeyanie: I actually tried doing full nudity, that was the original goal. It didn't work very well.

CM: What did you discover about the skins/models Bethesda used when you started work on the Oblivion mod?

Maeyanie: I discovered a few interesting things. For one, most of the skins and model parts are shared amongst all the races, the skins are just tinted. Also, the skins included with the game have all the, ah, "features" you see revealed with my mod already on them, so I didn't have to do a skin myself the way I expected. I'm guessing that's what the ESRB meant when they talked about this in the re-rating, but Bethesda was right, it really was impossible to do without third-party software.

CM: When did you release the mod?

Maeyanie: Very shortly after I got it working, which was about four days after Oblivion's retail release.

CM: And finally, to the whole kerfluffle that followed... What was the modding community's reaction to your Oblivion mod?

Maeyanie: As expected, mixed. There were the people who came saying "men topless are fine, but women are evil and must be shunned." There were the people saying "Cool! Hot naked chicks!" And there was even the odd one who said something supportive.

CM: Do you think that the ESRB was right in re-rating Oblivion, partially based on the content you discovered, or do you think they went too far?

Maeyanie: I completely disagree with them re-rating based on this. As Bethesda said, it was impossible without third-party software. I could post a hardcore sex photo on my Windows desktop even without using third-party software. Would that make Windows deserve an Adults-Only rating?

CM: Do you think companies should be held responsible for content discovered by modders?

Maeyanie: In the case of content in the game waiting to be unlocked by a certain button-sequence or whatever, yes, they put it there. In the case of mods requiring third-party software, downloads from the Internet, and other things, absolutely not. The ability to add content to a game is a great thing, and leads to much greater replayability (if that's a word) and all-around fun. Just because some people like me "abuse" this ability to add "evil" content based on a single culture's narrow definitions of what is and isn't appropriate isn't the fault of the developers.

CM: What do you think of the current obsession with criticizing sex in games? As a comparison, should games be criticized over something like this when Cosmopolitan just released to grocery stores another issue featuring "62 Sex Moves! Guys share mind-blowing tips!" and "7 Bedroom Games to Play Tonight"?

Maeyanie: Yeah, let's make Cosmo magazine only available to people over age 17! Seriously, I think America should lighten up a bit. There's a good chunk of the world which isn't nearly so obsessed over making our own bodies off-limits - I should know, I live there.

CM: Now that all's said and done, do you regret releasing the mod to the general public? Would you have released it knowing the reaction it caused?

Maeyanie: Overall... I don't know. There are times I do, definitely. I especially regret any harm to Bethesda, which has always been my favorite game developer because of the Elder Scrolls series. But then again, perhaps some good will come from this in the end. I can only hope.

CM: Again, thank you for taking the time to talk to us. Hopefully you'll be able to stop by the site when the article is up to answer any more questions readers may have.

Maeyanie: I'll definitely stop by at least a few times.

GP: Many thanks to Maeyanie for agreeing to be interviewed. For a recap of all of GamePolitics' extensive coverage on the Oblivion controversy, click here

Want to talk about it? You can discuss this story via the "comments" feature (click below), or in the new GamePolitics Forums...




(Post a new comment)


[info]zynth
2006-07-14 12:23 pm UTC (link)
Nothing really to contribute here, but it was very interesting to read this side of the coin. Great article/interview.

(Reply to this)


[info]goodrobotus
2006-07-14 12:47 pm UTC (link)
Nice Interview :)

Yeah, I think mentioning this in the ESRB's decision to re-rate Oblivion was probably the worst decision they have ever made. If they'd re-rated it due to violent content then fine, but instead they mentioned this, and then, with their usual complete failure to understand the technology they were attacking, the anti-game crowd latched onto it.

Very bad move Ms Vance. I can only hope you learn from your mistakes.

But hey, people like Thompson and Yee seem to think they can dictate what is right or wrong to the entire planet, that's not an ego trip in the slightest....

(Reply to this)


[info]raignmaker
2006-07-14 01:05 pm UTC (link)
The ESRB is currently under fire, and politicians are deciding that video games need to be regulated because the industry is not doing a good enough job itself.

In any case, the ESRB needs to show that it has teeth. It needs to show that it can be a "tough" and "in charge" to politicians. So maybe next time they get brought in front of some committee they can say something instead of, "Well it's a mod..."

Is it right? Not really.

But to people who don't understand programming, modding, and gaming... All they see are boobies.

(Reply to this)

So let me get this right...
[info]lightwarriorr
2006-07-14 01:17 pm UTC (link)
Bethesda Softworks made the content and all the modder had to do was unlock like as stated in the artical a near hot-coffie event?

Is this another one of those attempts to get mature content in a game while dodging an adult only rating? Like how some movies cut out content in the final production to dodge the NC-17+ rating?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: So let me get this right...
[info]goodrobotus
2006-07-14 02:10 pm UTC (link)
No, from what I understand the texture used is simply the topless male model, the modder simply removed the polygons that made up the bra of the female model, it was absolutely impossible to access that without downloading the third party mod with the modified mesh. Content wasn't removed before release, it was merely modified by a third party after release.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: So let me get this right... - [info]maeyanie, 2006-07-15 07:55 pm UTC
Re: So let me get this right... - [info]raignmaker, 2006-07-14 02:26 pm UTC
Re: So let me get this right... - [info]illspirit, 2006-07-14 05:01 pm UTC
Re: So let me get this right... - [info]jamesweis, 2006-07-17 02:50 pm UTC

[info]terminator44
2006-07-14 02:02 pm UTC (link)
I actually agree with the game being re-rated. Not because of the mod, but because there is too much realistic blood in the game to merit a T rating.

For those of you who haven't played the game (and why haven't you?), when you strike an enemy, the nearby surface usually gets covered in blood. And when the use a blade, mists of blood will spray from your enemies. It's not gratituous or anything, but if Halo 2 could get an M rating, I don't see why Oblivion shouldn't.

Now, I do believe the mod was partly responsible as it drew negative attention to the game. Thus, Bethesda must have thought "Hey, there're calling for us to re-rate our game. Since the violence is M-rated, we might as well do so. And since violence=okay and boobies=EVIL, we should cite the mod as our reason to show that we didn't rate the game wrong originally."

My final take on this? It was the right move for the wrong reason. I just hope we don't see more companies giving in to pressure over mods.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]raignmaker
2006-07-14 02:32 pm UTC (link)
"For those of you who haven't played the game (and why haven't you?)"

Because my xbox lacks the "360"...
and my bank account lacks a positvie balance.


Good points though, and I agree.

Right decision, wrong reason.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]terminator44, 2006-07-14 03:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]premo_maggot, 2006-07-14 04:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gamepolitics, 2006-07-14 04:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]xlorep_darkhelm, 2006-07-15 03:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]terminator44, 2006-07-15 07:51 pm UTC
your right - [info]nitkin1, 2006-07-14 03:57 pm UTC
Re: your right - [info]terminator44, 2006-07-14 07:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]xwaix, 2006-07-14 08:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]azradesh, 2006-07-15 11:43 am UTC
OK, she rocks
[info]mjolnirjack
2006-07-14 03:01 pm UTC (link)
". . . personally I find it more offensive to be treated like a 6-year-old than to see people naked . . ."

OK she just made my very cool person list

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: OK, she rocks
[info]maeyanie
2006-07-15 07:56 pm UTC (link)
:)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]thaddeusrrboyd
2006-07-14 03:54 pm UTC (link)
I could post a hardcore sex photo on my Windows desktop even without using third-party software. Would that make Windows deserve an Adults-Only rating?


Er, does she realize that the ESRB doesn't rate operating systems?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]slyfoxx
2006-07-14 04:18 pm UTC (link)
The same principle applies, though. In countless games, you can make your very own nude skin for game characters. In Half-Life 2, using Garry's Mod, if you feel the need to do so, you can position characters in such a way that makes them look like they're getting it on in positions that would probably make the author(s) of the Kama Sutra stare in wide-eyed awe or disgust.

Does that mean that all of these games deserve an Adults-Only rating?

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]trooper6, 2006-07-14 04:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]goodrobotus, 2006-07-14 04:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]thaddeusrrboyd, 2006-07-14 07:41 pm UTC
Technically - [info]jabrwock, 2006-07-14 10:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]goodrobotus, 2006-07-15 01:01 am UTC
Bad analogy - [info]jbourrie, 2006-07-14 11:48 pm UTC
Re: Bad analogy - [info]kroninokiller, 2006-07-15 06:45 am UTC
Re: Bad analogy - [info]gamepolitics, 2006-07-15 11:12 am UTC

[info]ss_ebonclaw
2006-07-14 04:45 pm UTC (link)
You know, calling the Construction Set an unauthorized 3rd party tool, is really quite sad. Since, well.. it's right here, on their own website. http://www.elderscrolls.com/downloads/updates_utilities.htm

All the modder did, was remove the poly skin that made up the bra. The only difference between the male and female upper body skins, is that the female one includes breasts in the poly model, while the male doesn't. Otherwise, it uses almost the exact same texture.

But, I do agree with the re-rating of the game to M. There's some content in there that even I was floored by, just from the sheer amount of innuendo, or how graphic it was.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]seikyochan
2006-07-14 04:56 pm UTC (link)
Actually TCS for Oblivion wasn's available when she created it, so she used a completely different tool to do so, which could be 3d studio max or some other modeling program.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ss_ebonclaw, 2006-07-14 05:09 pm UTC

[info]i_love_catgirls
2006-07-14 04:46 pm UTC (link)
She should release a topless version of her 3-D self portrait.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]terminator44
2006-07-14 07:01 pm UTC (link)
My sentiments exactly.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]gamepolitics, 2006-07-14 07:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hayabusa75, 2006-07-15 08:26 pm UTC

[info]theshroomguy
2006-07-14 04:52 pm UTC (link)
Forgive me for being obvious and partly off topic. But we realy need new people on the esrb ratings board. Young people that are gamers and in touch with the public view. If that happend Then most likey we will not be seeing games re rated for stupid reasons . Nuff said

(Reply to this)


[info]finaleve
2006-07-14 05:06 pm UTC (link)
So many points were made out, all of them pretty good.

The thing is, the gaming community isn't seen as something big yet, and isn't widely accepted (to some people). It is widely accepted that we play games, but now there are big gaming competitions, MTV is have shows that involve gaming (Its online based, but it will definately turn cable soon). Eventaully it will become accepted. Until then, we've got to deal with this crap from people.

Heh, Cosmo should definately be 17+. It's so retarded since there are 6 and 7 year olds out there that get the mag since it's a popular magazine.

(Reply to this)


[info]thefremen
2006-07-14 05:14 pm UTC (link)
This is fantastic! A mystery person with a good attitude, interesting point of view, and eclectic (and might I add, same as my own) taste in games.

I didn't even have to watch Fox! (Reference to Robert Novak)

I agree that it is bullshit for esrb to rerate based on a mod, they should have just re-rated based on violence alone. (Heads on a stick=MA) I would have been one of the supportive ones, no doubts there.

Another excellent exclusive escapade!

(Reply to this)


[info]slayemin
2006-07-14 05:58 pm UTC (link)
Fantastic interview! very intelligent and I agree with everything that was said.
I would guess that the fallout from this will mean more game developers will worry about protecting their games from third party applications.
Or on the flip side, they could embrace the idea of naked characters and target the 18-40 demographic. (18, since thats what the ratings would require)

(Reply to this)

One question i'd like answered...
[info]philoetus
2006-07-14 06:08 pm UTC (link)
I've never found out if this question has been answered, but was the female nude skin obviously distinct from the male nude skin, or is it simply a modified (remapped to fit) version of the male skin?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: One question i'd like answered...
[info]scazza
2006-07-14 06:49 pm UTC (link)
The female and male skins are identicle, just shaped around a different mesh. That is why the female version had "nipples" they were just the male nipples.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: One question i'd like answered... - [info]maeyanie, 2006-07-15 08:04 pm UTC
You hear that, Thompson?
[info]kincyr
2006-07-14 06:34 pm UTC (link)
Go after Cosmopolitan. They're marketing tips for actual sex and any minor can buy an issue. If you don't go after literature I can understand, seeing that Song of Songs is the Holy Bible's very own "Hot Coffee"

(Reply to this)

Yep..
[info]scazza
2006-07-14 07:02 pm UTC (link)
I am a bit blindsided by the lack of knowledge some posters and people in general have here. Those who are saying that the they agree with the rerating because the content was technically there are totally wrong. A developer should never have to spend extra time and money trying to circumvent modders and thinking of ways a modder could use their game.

What most people do not realize, is that this same type of mod could be applied to hundreds of different games, INCLUDING the sims (which is has, numerous times). Every character model is created in a mesh frame, then pasted a texture over. Most companies use a texture that include bra/panties pasted right on. Oblivion decided to use just underwear and not a bra, because the same underlying texture would be applied to the male character model too (which dosn't need a bra). Some modder just had to remove the second layer of "bra" on the female model and ta-da.. you have deformed looking tits.

Sure, this technically cannot be applied to movies as someone pointed out, but it dosn't make games evil because other people can modify the base software. With the hot coffee mod, it is partially understandable. It was infact a minigame that was "locked" away. This however was not an intentional pornographic game, but a regular object used in all games.

Plus I got to agree with the modder too. The US (and canada to an extent) is far too uptight about this stuff now. Way too hypocritical over these matters. When I can see britany pregnant and naked in a magazine, yet cant see a modified, partially deformed model of a naked argonian, its just bizarre.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Yep..
[info]terminator44
2006-07-14 07:11 pm UTC (link)
What most people do not realize, is that this same type of mod could be applied to hundreds of different games, INCLUDING the sims (which is has, numerous times). Every character model is created in a mesh frame, then pasted a texture over. Most companies use a texture that include bra/panties pasted right on. Oblivion decided to use just underwear and not a bra, because the same underlying texture would be applied to the male character model too (which dosn't need a bra). Some modder just had to remove the second layer of "bra" on the female model and ta-da.. you have deformed looking tits.

If you read some of the posts here, you would realize that many people believed the game should have been M anyway for its violent content. The mod was most likely used as a cover story to rerate the game without making Bethsda look like it conned the ESRB into giving its violent game a T rating.


Plus I got to agree with the modder too. The US (and canada to an extent) is far too uptight about this stuff now. Way too hypocritical over these matters. When I can see britany pregnant and naked in a magazine, yet cant see a modified, partially deformed model of a naked argonian, its just bizarre.

Hear, hear. I just don't understand the logic that it's okay to shoot someone in the face in a video game (unless they're a cop), yet it's not okay to see boobies in that same game. I mean, come on, who wouldn't want to see some Argonian porn. ;)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Yep.. - [info]scazza, 2006-07-14 10:03 pm UTC
Re: Yep.. - [info]terminator44, 2006-07-15 01:19 am UTC
Re: Yep.. - [info]maeyanie, 2006-07-15 08:08 pm UTC
Re: Yep.. - [info]scazza, 2006-07-16 01:48 am UTC

(Screened Post)
Pinging reader anti-guy...
[info]gamepolitics
2006-07-14 09:30 pm UTC (link)
Ya know, I was unable to post your comment due to the last line.

Please see our comments policy: http://gamepolitics.livejournal.com/304849.html

Thx,

GP

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Pinging reader anti-guy... - [info]curiousthompson, 2006-07-15 12:34 am UTC
Re: Pinging reader anti-guy... - [info]gamepolitics, 2006-07-15 01:25 am UTC
Re: Pinging reader anti-guy... - [info]terminator44, 2006-07-15 04:15 am UTC
Re: Pinging reader anti-guy... - [info]gamepolitics, 2006-07-15 11:19 am UTC

[info]chaosepoch
2006-07-14 09:27 pm UTC (link)
I can see both sides of the arguement...

When originally rated, the game was rated appropriately. However, when you buy this game for yourself, or anyone else with any degree of computer litteracy, you expose them to all custom content created. This makes the game potentially deserving of a higher rating.

Though this isn't a solution as it creates more anger among the older users. Now what would be appropriate is leglislation on the mod-publishing sites to conform mods to their respective ratings. But then where do you draw the line wiht personal freedom and the deformation of intellectual property (this rerating has modified the audience that the developer would previously have gained).

A tricky issue, but one that's very challenging to resolve... What can you do?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]scazza
2006-07-15 09:43 am UTC (link)
2 problems with that...

1. Xbox360 version was re-rated and had no access to those types of mods.

2. How can you police the internet? It is impossible. Plus like you said, anyone with some time on their hands could create the same mod... in Oblivion, or even The Sims. In space games, that come with ship editors, I could make giant penis shaped space ships... should those games get a hire category?

Modding in any way, shape or form should never have a bearing on the rating of a game, as even the most innocent of games can be modded to include pornographic stuff, it really isn't that hard.

What about a NEW descriptor. You know how under the M or T rating, is a bunch of "Sexual content, Mild Language" how about "Moddable" with a little "*" beside it and a lil info blurb saying "game may be user modded to include content not forseen by the developer."

Technically it have to be on EVERY PC game to an extent. But games with tools bundled in the box/online from the developer should be required to have this rating descriptor.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]chaosepoch, 2006-07-15 12:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]scazza, 2006-07-15 01:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaosepoch, 2006-07-15 03:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]scazza, 2006-07-15 04:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaosepoch, 2006-07-15 10:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jamesweis, 2006-07-17 03:30 pm UTC

[info]anti_guy
2006-07-14 11:41 pm UTC (link)
Either modders have to stop making mods that they know are going to cause problems for game developers and the industry, or politicians and important players in the gaming industry need to stop being so god-damned strait-laced. This is really growing more and more ridiculous as time goes on.

I'd prefer if the latter occurred, because last time I checked, third-party mods are out of a developer's control, and therefore not thier fault. It's the same as if a company builds and sells a car to someone who outfits it with a rocket launcher. Who's fault would that be? The people who built the car or the guy that built the weapon for it?

Jack Thompson is the most unprofessional man I've ever spoken to, by the way. I'll leave it at that.

(Reply to this)


[info]automancer
2006-07-15 04:51 am UTC (link)
Jack Thompson is the most unprofessional man I've ever spoken to, by the way. I'll leave it at that.

I think we can all pretty much agree on that.

As for the mod, I agree with everything that was said in the interview. Even though I am not a modder myself I have respect for those who mod games because I mostly play games (on the PC) where modding the game is common or even encourged (like the Sims and The Sims 2). Modders like, Maeyanie and others are very talented programmers that are able to tailor and customize their game in their own way and want to share their talent with others, like and artist.

However, I haven't played the game yet (I don't have a 360 yet and my compy just barely runs the Sims 2 and it's expansions) so I don't know how violent the violence is in the game. I think it was fine that it was rerated but from what I hear, I think it was for the wrong reason.

-Auto

(Reply to this)

Off-Topic, but found a news story....
[info]beardoggx
2006-07-15 09:02 am UTC (link)
http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/3357261.html

The second page had some irony as GP just ran a story about this person a couple of weeks ago:

State Sen. Mike Michot said he has seen a change in his son, Mikie, 11.

He said Mikie talks about wanting to be a military engineer when he grows up.

“I think he sees the whole GameCamp! experience has brought to light how playing games can translate into a university curriculum,” Michot said.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Off-Topic, but found a news story....
[info]gamepolitics
2006-07-15 11:08 am UTC (link)
thx, Bear!

Checking that story out now. You may see it again sometime.

;-)

GP

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Off-Topic, but found a news story.... - [info]nutzboy, 2006-07-15 02:19 pm UTC

[info]moonlightmiko
2006-07-15 07:30 pm UTC (link)
I don't really have much to contribute to this (especially since I haven't played this series) but it was probably the best choice to re-rate, given that I've heard so much about the amount of blood in the game that it should've been rated M initially anyway.

What to really say? Stuff like this happens, unfortunate for the modder who was used as a scapegoat, but all-in-all, let's just hope that none of the other companies start to re-rate their games on something so trivial.

Honestly, people - the human body is not evil, and while I don't think we need to flaunt it frivolously, it was just a little modder enjoying the game and goofing off; blood is the only reason I can guess at the rating change being good (again, haven't played).

(Reply to this)


[info]grimm24
2006-07-16 06:39 pm UTC (link)
I dont see what the big deal is

I mean its not sexual as stated many times before, its realistic

I mean the only difference between a shirtless guy and a shirtless girl is boobs...usually that is a big deal (well to guys anyway),but this is a freakin video game.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]chaosepoch
2006-07-17 09:50 am UTC (link)
America seems not to be mind slaughter, but they're afraid of any nudity. Probably due to their blood-soaked past.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

umm
[info]nebula0024
2006-07-17 02:40 pm UTC (link)
I find it interesting that no one has brought this point up:
It is easier to just find porn on the internet than to mod your favorite RPG to include a nude skin. So if your kid is installing nude skins it probably means he has been looking at porn, which is 999999999999 times easier to find and view than installing a topless mod.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: umm
[info]gamepolitics
2006-07-17 02:47 pm UTC (link)
wait... porn? ...on the Internet?

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Bethesda to blame?
[info]jarstult
2006-08-09 03:37 pm UTC (link)
If anyone should be held accountable for the access of the nudity acquired by this mod it should be the sites that allow it to be downloaded without an adult content agreement. But I do agree that the "M" rating is justified due to the blood/gore.

Then again maybe society should lighten up and realize that the human form is nothing to be ashamed of. Sad that death and violence are more acceptable in today's society than breasts.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Bethesda to blame?
[info]bigmorphnet
2006-08-17 06:55 am UTC (link)
well I can't understand what the problem is? firstly if any teens want this game/mod rating it M isn't really going to help, because even if the parents won't buy the game for their kids, there are tons of other ways for them to get the game and mods. Secondly in order to get the mod you need internet access and if you have that the chances of kids downloading this mod just to see naked women is slim when there are tons of other material on the net. The whole thing stinks of politics to me. "lets make it look like we're doing something useful for once" is more the message alot of us are getting. As for the violence in the game.... I've seen worse on the 6pm news. no wander so many kids are messed up these days the inconsistency of morality in our society is scary to say the least. Let em change the rating I say, it will only lead to intelligent parents distrusting the ratings in the future.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…