Game Politics ([info]gamepolitics) wrote,
@ 2006-04-28 11:37:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:eliot spitzer, esa, esrb, legislation, new york

New York A.G. Spitzer Calls For Game Legislation

He's high-profile, ambitious, and definitely not afraid to pursue indictments, issue subpoenas and drag corporations into court. He's Eliot Spitzer, New York's Attorney General. He's also the state's leading candidate for governor in November.

And - just this morning - the Democrat went on record as being in favor of two of the video game industry's recurring nightmares: retail legislation as well as a universal rating system for all media.

Spitzer spoke at the Buffalo-Niagara YMCA, spending much of his time talking about corporate responsibility in marketing to children. Although he also hit on tobacco usage, gun availability and junk food, a good part of Spitzer's speech was directed at media influence. He clearly fired a shot across the bow of the video game industry. His remarks, in part:

"Like all parents, I know it is increasingly difficult to protect our children from negative influences. Parents and schools need the government's help in curbing irresponsible behavior by corporations that market harmful products to our kids."

"...today I want to talk about a different kind of 'corporate responsibility,' one that does not get nearly the attention it deserves: that is a responsibility for corporations to stop treating our children as fair game for products that cause them great harm. And if corporations fail to live up to that responsibility it is vital that government step in..."

"...self-regulation doesn't always work... we have learned that when self-regulation fails, government must step in... these two lessons have informed my actions as Attorney General and they will inform my actions as Governor. Today, I would like to lay out a strategy to ensure we start defining deviancy up instead of down, to make sure our children are not left to be mere prey in a race to the lowest common denominator. "

"...we must do more to protect our children from excessive sex and violence in the media... Many children spend more time interacting with media - whether it be television, radio, video games or the Internet - than they do in school or with their parents."

"...media content has gotten more graphic, more violent and more sex-based... And it is not just television anymore. We now have to deal with video games, the Internet and a proliferation of other media that have made our jobs as parents even more challenging."

"The effects of media's influence on our children have been well documented. The American Academy of Pediatrics has said that 'Playing violent video games is to adolescent's violent behavior what smoking is to lung cancer...' Industry leaders must confront the failure of self-regulation... As Senator Clinton has urged, industry leaders like the... the (ESRB) for videogames... should come together to set uniform rating standards across all forms of media. Currently, we have an incomprehensible web of different rating systems that are inconsistently applied. A uniform rating system would make it easier for parents..."

"While we wait for these organizations to take action, New York State must take matters into its own hands. We should follow the lead of states like California, Illinois and Michigan and pass 'Safe Games' legislation, which would ban the sale and rental of violent and sexually explicit video games to children under 18. The (ESRB) does have a rating system that warns consumers of content unsuitable for children, but it's often ignored. Laws protecting underage kids from harmful products are nothing new – laws preventing kids from buying cigarettes serve as just one example. But currently, nothing under New York State law prohibits a fourteen-year old from walking into a video store and buying a game labeled 'Adult Only' - a game like 'Grand Theft Auto,' which rewards a player for stealing cars and beating people up. Children can even simulate having sex with a prostitute and then killing her."

"'Safe Games' legislation should also require retailers to post signs explaining the video game rating system to customers. Democrats and Republicans both have bills that would address these problems, but they have gone nowhere. It is time to make this a priority."

GP: Aside from Hillary Clinton, Spitzer just might be the highest-profile politician to jump into this fight. This is definitely not good news for the video game industry. We've asked the ESA and ESRB for reaction, and will publish those as they are received.



Page 1 of 8
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]jargon_john
2006-04-28 04:20 pm UTC (link)
And another bits the dust...

(Reply to this)


[info]the1jeffy
2006-04-28 04:22 pm UTC (link)
""The effects of media's influence on our children have been well documented. The American Academy of Pediatrics has said that 'Playing violent video games is to adolescent's violent behavior what smoking is to lung cancer...' "

Wow, that's like, slander? Or at least a lie.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]bustermanzero, 2006-04-28 05:05 pm UTC
Technically they did say that - [info]jabrwock, 2006-04-28 05:57 pm UTC
Re: Technically they did say that - [info]seph2710, 2006-04-28 06:21 pm UTC
Re: Technically they did say that - [info]the1jeffy, 2006-04-28 06:21 pm UTC
Re: Technically they did say that - [info]brerwolf, 2006-04-28 06:41 pm UTC
Re: Technically they did say that - [info]jabrwock, 2006-04-28 07:05 pm UTC
About second hand smoke - [info]jerrydavid, 2006-04-28 07:35 pm UTC
Re: About second hand smoke - [info]acroamatis, 2006-05-01 05:34 pm UTC
Re: Technically they did say that - [info]the1jeffy, 2006-04-28 06:21 pm UTC
Re: Technically they did say that - [info]jabrwock, 2006-04-28 07:07 pm UTC
Re: Technically they did say that - [info]the1jeffy, 2006-04-28 07:31 pm UTC
Re: Technically they did say that - [info]beacon80, 2006-04-28 07:47 pm UTC

[info]anticron
2006-04-28 04:23 pm UTC (link)
We should follow the lead of states like California, Illinois and Michigan and pass 'Safe Games' legislation

I'm not really sure burning $660,000 of the taxpayer's money is such a wise thing to trumpet.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]bustermanzero, 2006-04-28 05:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]anticron, 2006-04-28 05:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dutch_gamer, 2006-04-28 07:13 pm UTC

[info]ianc14
2006-04-28 04:23 pm UTC (link)
'Playing violent video games is to adolescent's violent behavior what smoking is to lung cancer...'
This is the silliest comparison ever.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]bigman_k, 2006-04-28 04:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ace_ofspade, 2006-04-28 04:27 pm UTC
And I don't have lung cancer, either - [info]beacon80, 2006-04-28 05:17 pm UTC
Re: And I don't have lung cancer, either - [info]thefremen, 2006-04-28 07:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]amisplacedphile, 2006-04-28 06:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dutch_gamer, 2006-04-28 07:19 pm UTC

[info]goodrobotus
2006-04-28 04:25 pm UTC (link)
Oh dear, and it sounded so hopeful at the start. A media-wide legislation would, at least, have directly faced up to some of the concerns of the persecuted gamers in the US, but then he went and put his foot in it repeatedly :(

'Playing violent video games is to adolescent's violent behavior what smoking is to lung cancer...'

Huh?

'We should follow the lead of states like California, Illinois and Michigan and pass 'Safe Games' legislation'

They passed them, sure, then they got ruled unconstitutional.

This man is the Attorney General of New York and isn't aware of this? I'm a UK citizen and I am....

That's more than a little worrying.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]panicbutton42, 2006-04-28 04:57 pm UTC

[info]demon_jd
2006-04-28 04:25 pm UTC (link)
Please, Eliot, please, protect me from myself! Protect my children from themselves! We, as normal humans, can't make up our own minds about what's good for ourselves and our families! Please violate our right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness! How will I protect myself from images of sex and violence, not to mention *gasp* junk food, without a big, strong politician like you to tell me what's good for me?

"It is vital that government step in..." <----This is almost never true. And especially not in this case.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]bustermanzero, 2006-04-28 05:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fallbackcorpse, 2006-04-28 07:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]demon_jd, 2006-04-28 09:49 pm UTC
Damn you...
[info]ace_ofspade
2006-04-28 04:25 pm UTC (link)
Damn you Rockstar North, Rockstar Leeds, Rockstar San Diego, Rockstar Toronto, Rockstar Vancouver, Rockstar London, Rockstar Vienna, Rockstar Lincoln, and Take-Two. This is all your fault. Nobody cared before Hot Coffee, and you opened the doors right open for this. Bully is the last game I'm buying from you, maybe.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Why is it Rockstar's fault? - [info]riffraff1138, 2006-04-28 04:52 pm UTC
Re: Why is it Rockstar's fault? - [info]bustermanzero, 2006-04-28 05:11 pm UTC
Re: Why is it Rockstar's fault? - [info]trencher, 2006-04-28 07:02 pm UTC
Re: Why is it Rockstar's fault? - [info]pixelante_ninja, 2006-04-28 07:22 pm UTC
Re: Why is it Rockstar's fault? - [info]demon_jd, 2006-04-28 09:51 pm UTC
Re: Why is it Rockstar's fault? - [info]boffo97, 2006-04-29 08:32 am UTC

[info]jabrwock
2006-04-28 04:28 pm UTC (link)
The Entertainment Software Rating Board does have a rating system that warns consumers of content unsuitable for children, but it's often ignored.

So to deal with this, instead of punishing parents, we'll punish the industry. Damn you for not forcing parents to pay attention! Damn yooooooooou!

On another note, since R-rated DVDs are sold to children more often than M-rated games, where's the "safe movies" legislation? Clearly the MPAA is targetting minors with R-rated movies... and their enforcement is attrocious compared to the ESRB.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]anticron, 2006-04-28 04:30 pm UTC
Urge to kill raising....
[info]bigman_k
2006-04-28 04:31 pm UTC (link)
I'm so damn sick and tired of this "protect the children" bullshit. I've said it before and i'll say it again, Children neither need nor want your "so-called" protection. Anyways, it's not violent media that makes me violent, it censormongering nanny state politicans such as this guy that make me want to commit act of violence.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Urge to kill raising.... - [info]misstigerpounce, 2006-04-28 05:13 pm UTC
Canwest Gazette quote:
[info]jabrwock
2006-04-28 04:35 pm UTC (link)
Parents who play: Video game generation comes of age

Ren Reynolds, a contributor to Terranova, an online collective of academics, said parents who don't feel comfortable with video games are less likely to monitor what games their children are playing than parents who play themselves.

"A lot of parents still don't understand technology. They are techno-phobic," he said. Such parents often adopt a hands-off approach to their children's gaming, he said.

"What I see happening a lot is well-meaning and well-educated parents giving (an adult game) to a 12-year-old. Would they give hardcore porn to a child?"

Parents should set limits on which games their children are allowed to play, he said. "If it says an age on a video game, it means that. Read the label."

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Canwest Gazette quote: - [info]dutch_gamer, 2006-04-28 07:25 pm UTC

[info]phantompvp
2006-04-28 04:37 pm UTC (link)
The fact that he wants to follow the lead of Illinois is something that a savvy political opponent should be able to jump on. A desire to waste upwards of one million in taxpayer dollars should not be a campaign platform.

Nonetheless, this is simple political maneuvering in a race to become governor. It’s a pandering appeal for votes, and we have the Constitution on our side.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]anticron, 2006-04-28 04:42 pm UTC
aha!
[info]jabrwock
2006-04-28 04:37 pm UTC (link)
He's also the state's leading candidate for governor in November.

That explains it. If he doesn't criticize "evil" media, then his opponent will, and he'll look bad.

I almost wish that they had a universal system, then when it doesn't work, because parents are still ignoring it because "games are just for kids", THEN what will he say?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: aha! - [info]lost_watcher, 2006-04-28 05:34 pm UTC
Odd
[info]woundwalker
2006-04-28 04:40 pm UTC (link)
OK, so he thinks messages in games, TV, radio, books, internet etc are all harmful.

So he is going to legislate against video games.

That's it.

Any thoughts?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Odd - [info]finaleve, 2006-04-28 07:33 pm UTC
Re: Odd - [info]getwellgamer, 2006-04-28 09:16 pm UTC

[info]boffo97
2006-04-28 04:41 pm UTC (link)
"Parents and schools need the government's help in curbing irresponsible behavior by
corporations that market harmful products to our kids."

You fail right there.

Parents need to do their job or not have kids in the first place.

Stop scapegoating and stop advocating a nanny state.

(Reply to this)

Election years.
[info]anticron
2006-04-28 04:41 pm UTC (link)
It's really very unfortuante that politicians feel the need to sling about things like this. On one hand, if they don't support it, they're labelled "family haters" and won't get (re-)elected; on the other hand, if they do support it, they know they'll be wasting a whole lot of taxpayer dollars on something that is unconstitutional.

The system is horribly, horribly broken.

Instead of representing their potential (or continuing) constituents like they should, they are only representing themselves.

(Reply to this)


[info]xlorep_darkhelm
2006-04-28 04:48 pm UTC (link)
I love it when politicians prove their utter and complete idiocy to their constituancy. New Yorkers, remember not to vote to re-elect this dunce.

(Reply to this)

Oh god.....
[info]kurisu7885
2006-04-28 04:54 pm UTC (link)
he practically sounds like Jack.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Oh god..... - [info]lost_watcher, 2006-04-28 05:36 pm UTC
Jeeze
[info]durlock
2006-04-28 04:56 pm UTC (link)
Maybe someone should keep a running tab of how much money they've wasted. Where was it that I read that the ESA was suing a state because of wasted money?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Jeeze - dragonmick, 2006-04-28 05:35 pm UTC
Awesome.
[info]jaykaos
2006-04-28 05:08 pm UTC (link)
Yes, this is awesome.
Why is it awesome you ask?
Because I live in NY, and now I have a chance to do something.
I can vote against this schmuck.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Awesome. - [info]lost_watcher, 2006-04-28 05:37 pm UTC
The real reason why he wants to "Save the Children"
[info]jindewinter
2006-04-28 05:10 pm UTC (link)
"He's also the state's leading candidate for governor> in November."

Need we say more?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Is it election time again? - [info]startropics, 2006-04-28 05:13 pm UTC
Re: Is it election time again? - [info]misstigerpounce, 2006-04-28 05:29 pm UTC
Re: The real reason why he wants to "Save the Children" - [info]kurisu7885, 2006-04-28 05:14 pm UTC
AOGTABBQ?
[info]illspirit
2006-04-28 05:15 pm UTC (link)
But currently, nothing under New York State law prohibits a fourteen-year old from walking into a video store and buying a game labeled “Adult Only” – a game like “Grand Theft Auto,” which rewards a player for stealing cars and beating people up. Children can even simulate having sex with a prostitute and then killing her.

Putting aside the fact the writer of the article is either a complete idiot/liar, as GTA isn't and hasn't been rated AO (save for a month or two last year)... A kid can't walk into a store and buy an AO game because virtually no retailers carry them to begin with. The real AO games don't reward players for violence either, since they're all basically porn games.

The bit about how NY should follow in the footsteps of states that have wasted millions of dollars on unconstitutional laws is priceless though. :P

(Reply to this)

Well Aint that Grant
[info]gdex86
2006-04-28 05:25 pm UTC (link)
While this is happening alot its not like any of us should be suprised. Its an election year and every seneatoral canidate or any other canidate loves to court that family values vote. But at the same time there are limits. They will court the vote but not to the point where it will piss off those that pay for all there nasty attack ads. Thus why we don't see targeting of alcohal or smoking or TV or the RIAA so mcuh. Everyone knows how powerful all those lobbying groups are.

At the same time the "Family Values" vote is something thats complicated to get. Gun safety is a prime example of this. Look in the early to mid 90s when all those gun control bills were passed. Some of the senators and representaives who got them passed faced a backlash because that vote for the children also was the vote that the NRA had a nice hold on.

All in all this election will be interesting to see what effect the VGVN will have. This being a midterm election with so many seats in a republician controled senate up for grabs may force some disloyality in the vote. I for one plan to vote heavily democrate not always because I believe that they will more often vote acording to what I would like but because I think the system as a whole works better when one party does not control all the branches. Those votes may go against the my views should be the final police on media their children view and the government should stay out.

So long story short. This may not be the election year where the VGVN manages to unite the video game vote in to a nice block of 5 million plus votes nationally with about 100 thousdand per state creating a block of votes that while may not win you the election could definatly hurt you. That block of votes could probably force alot of politicians to actually read the studies rather then just the headlines, and if they decide to inact laws that they are less sensational.

(Reply to this)

Alright, that's it, I've had enough.
[info]zeroxphoenix
2006-04-28 05:27 pm UTC (link)
I am officially sick and tired of daily seeing my hobby torn apart as the new problem in America by complete morons like Spitzer and Jack Thompson. This shit seriously needs to come to an end. I hope someone from the ESA is at E3 that I can talk to about this. I'm also going to start posting about local legislation happenings on my website when possible to alert others and spread the word about the VGVN at Howie's Game Shack, my second job (http://www.howies.com/).

My fellow Pixelantes, I believe it is time we mobilized like never before. I've been lazy about it, but now I'm taking a fucking stand. I'm not going to let these idiot politicians step in and make these ridiculous, tax dollar wasting laws when the money could be put to educating parents about the best ratings system in the country.

Oh, and Yack, if you read this, I think you need to run back home to Floriduh and hide underneath a rock. Your appearance on Kansas TV pretty much DID seal your fate. Looking forward to seeing you disbarred,

~ Sean "Lord Phoenix" Lane ~
Webmaster, Founder
Planet Mega Man
http://www.planet-megaman.com/

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Alright, that's it, I've had enough. - [info]lost_watcher, 2006-04-28 05:40 pm UTC
Re: Alright, that's it, I've had enough. - [info]zeroxphoenix, 2006-04-29 08:14 am UTC
Re: Alright, that's it, I've had enough. - [info]phoenixzero, 2006-04-28 07:33 pm UTC
But I'm sick and tired of your being sick and tired... - [info]spitzeragenius, 2006-04-28 09:07 pm UTC
Re: But I'm sick and tired of your being sick and tired... - [info]ianc14, 2006-04-28 09:31 pm UTC
Re: But I'm sick and tired of your being sick and tired... - [info]jaykaos, 2006-04-28 09:35 pm UTC
Re: But I'm sick and tired of your being sick and tired... - [info]pelka64, 2006-04-28 09:38 pm UTC
This isn't about games - [info]lowe0, 2006-04-28 09:47 pm UTC
Re: This isn't about games - [info]pannic_atack, 2006-04-28 10:43 pm UTC
Re: But I'm sick and tired of your being sick and tired... - [info]zeroxphoenix, 2006-04-28 10:47 pm UTC
Re: But I'm sick and tired of your being sick and tired... - [info]xnamkcor, 2006-04-28 11:20 pm UTC
Re: But I'm sick and tired of your being sick and tired... - [info]boffo97, 2006-04-29 08:34 am UTC
hmmm
[info]enmitywithin
2006-04-28 05:36 pm UTC (link)
does anyone else remember jack emailing spitzer?


"Like all parents, I know it is increasingly difficult to protect our children from negative influences. Parents and schools need the government's help in curbing irresponsible behavior by
corporations that market harmful products to our kids."

that's why the ESRB exists. so the PARENTS can DO THEIR JOB


"...self-regulation doesn't always work... we have learned that when self-regulation fails, government must step in... these two lessons have informed my actions as Attorney General and they will inform my actions as Governor. Today, I would like to lay out a strategy to ensure we start defining deviancy up instead of down, to make sure our children are not left to be mere prey in a race to the lowest common denominator. "

tell the self-regulation spiel to the MPAA. your getting a bit pompous to assume that you are going to be elected as governor. Children never have been, are not, and most likely never will be "mere prey in a race to the lowest common denominator" as they are the future people. I know that sounded corny and such, but it's true.

"...we must do more to protect our children from excessive sex and violence in the media... Many children spend more time interacting with media – whether it be television, radio, video games or the Internet - than they do in school or with their parents."

it's already being done, oh wait, I forgot how censored an environment the USA is! seriously. there is no big conspiracy. perhaps i parents did their jobs then the kids wouldn't be playing so many videogames!

"...media content has gotten more graphic, more violent and more sex-based... And it is not just television anymore. We now have to deal with video games, the Internet and a proliferation of other media that have made our jobs as parents even more challenging."

and for good reason. because at the same time, the world is getting more graphic too. if you want your children to grow up all protected and their naivety remaining untouched, fine. but when they get screwed over, I'm blaming you.


"While we wait for these organizations to take action, New York State must take matters into its own hands. We should follow the lead of states like California, Illinois and Michigan and pass 'Safe Games' legislation, which would ban the sale and rental of violent and sexually explicit video games to children under 18. The Entertainment Software Rating Board does have a rating system that warns consumers of content unsuitable for children, but it's often ignored. Laws protecting underage kids from harmful products are nothing new – laws preventing kids from buying cigarettes serve as just one example. But currently, nothing under New York State law prohibits a fourteen-year old from walking into a video store and buying a game labeled 'Adult Only' - a game like 'Grand Theft Auto,' which rewards a player for stealing cars and beating people up. Children can even simulate having sex with a prostitute and then killing her."

guess what? the enforcement of those laws? not happened. if it's IGNORED, that's the PARENT'S FAULT! and there is currently something that prevents a 14-year-old from getting an AO game, that being that most places don't carry AO games. show me a place that sells AO games and I'll show you a porn shop.

"'Safe Games' legislation should also require retailers to post signs explaining the video game rating system to customers. Democrats and Republicans both have bills that would address these problems, but they have gone nowhere. It is time to make this a priority."
okay, the entire thing requiring signs? that's just stupid. the ESRB DOES have a website. if parents want ot see the ratings, they can spend 5 minutes to see them at www.esrb.com

it's obvious that if spitzer has to say all that vile spew, then I'm glad to not live there, and parents DO have a job to do. it's called PARENTING>

(Reply to this)(Thread)

No, I didn't email him. I faxed him my letters. - [info]spitzeragenius, 2006-04-28 09:09 pm UTC
Re: No, I didn't email him. I faxed him my letters. - [info]ianc14, 2006-04-28 09:32 pm UTC
Re: No, I didn't email him. I faxed him my letters. - [info]boffo97, 2006-04-29 08:37 am UTC
Re: No, I didn't email him. I faxed him my letters. - [info]enmitywithin, 2006-04-29 01:58 am UTC
Re: No, I didn't email him. I faxed him my letters. - [info]boffo97, 2006-04-29 08:37 am UTC
Re: hmmm - [info]spitzeragenius, 2006-04-28 09:16 pm UTC
Re: hmmm - [info]ianc14, 2006-04-28 09:33 pm UTC
Re: hmmm - [info]jaykaos, 2006-04-28 09:34 pm UTC
Re: hmmm - [info]bayushisan, 2006-04-28 09:50 pm UTC
Surprise - [info]lowe0, 2006-04-28 09:51 pm UTC
CAPS LOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL! - [info]brendanthejedi, 2006-04-28 11:16 pm UTC
ohhh goody! - [info]enmitywithin, 2006-04-29 02:08 am UTC
Re: hmmm - [info]jackvsdavid, 2006-04-29 08:17 am UTC
Re: hmmm - [info]slyfoxx, 2006-04-29 03:23 pm UTC
OT, Pixelante
[info]nightwng2000
2006-04-28 05:38 pm UTC (link)
Ok, I'm giving a Pixelante T-shirt to my son's girlfriend on the 13th of May. I'm also giving her a document to explain, at least in some way, what Pixelante means. An explanation in a way that might be interesting to her. She's turning 11 years old.
Anyway, I'm not trying to step on anyone's toes or remake the definition for anyone else, but thought I'd come up with something interesting. I can't figure out how to copy from notepad to here and keep the font into. So it will probably look "normal" to you here. I'm using "Monotype Corsiva" font in Bold Italic at font size 20. The following is what I have so far:

PIXELANTE:

In the beginning, there were the many individuals, called Gamers, who shared a common interest. They did take pleasure and enjoyment in that common interest and were happy. But soon, a dark shadow came upon the land and did decend upon Gamers. It did accuse them of using their common interest to bring harm to others, through words or physical acts. It did
accuse the Gamers of being dangerous and being harmed by the very thing that made them happy. It did accuse them of being the worst of humanity. And in so doing, did give the Gamers a new name: Pixelante.

One would think that this should anger and even enrage the Gamers. For they had been given a name that would have them seen as something horrible and evil.

But, the Gamers were not as beaten down as the dark shadow thought. For they were more intelligent than it had expected. The Gamers had known that the description the shadow had given for them was not true. So the new name given to them could was not set in stone because the definition was actually a lie. No matter how many times and how far the shadow tried to spread the new name, it could not stay fixed in stone because it was a lie.

Then did Gamers decide to take the name from the shadow and give it a new meaning and make it theirs for all time. And this is what the Gamers decided would make a Pixelante:

A Pixelante
(1) Shall take pleasure and enjoyment from the Virtual World (whether that Virtual World be of games, television, movies, or books).

(2) Shall not confuse the fictious, unreal world of the Virtual World with the Real World in which the Pixelante lives.

(3) Shall give aid and comfort to those Pixelantes who have lost their way by forgetting the second rule and shall aid them in finding the true path again.

(4) Shall always be responsible for their own actions and never blame any part of the Virtual World for their actions for that is not where a Pixelante lives.

(5) Shall always act with honor, ethics, and intelligence in the Real World.

(6) Shall never surrender their honor, ethics, or intelligence in defence of the Truth of their nature as previously defined.

And though the dark shadow still looms, Gamers have, to this day and forever more, been Proud to be a Pixelante!




Ok. Opinions please. Also, I want a line to describe that a Pixelante will defend Freedom of Expression but at the same time, must recognize that a Parent has the decision making ability for a Pixelante minor. It sounds icky that way. I've tried thinking of several ways, but it's just not coming out right. I know a few people don't like the parents having say over the kid, but it's what I want on the document for the 11 year old. I want her to know she has rights that extend up til where her parent's rights start.

Thanks for your attention and help.

nightwng2000

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: OT, Pixelante - [info]fallbackcorpse, 2006-04-28 07:31 pm UTC
Re: OT, Pixelante - [info]pixelante_ninja, 2006-04-28 07:31 pm UTC
Heh. - [info]durlock, 2006-04-28 07:36 pm UTC
Re: OT, Pixelante - [info]cryptic_persona, 2006-04-28 07:50 pm UTC
A Pixelante by Definition, Since You Asked... - [info]spitzeragenius, 2006-04-28 09:24 pm UTC
Re: A Pixelante by Definition, Since You Asked... - [info]yzzerdd, 2006-04-28 09:29 pm UTC
Re: A Pixelante by Definition, Since You Asked... - [info]riffraff1138, 2006-04-28 09:32 pm UTC
Re: A Pixelante by Definition, Since You Asked... - [info]yzzerdd, 2006-04-28 09:41 pm UTC
Re: A Pixelante by Definition, Since You Asked... - [info]teh_truthkeeper, 2006-04-29 08:16 pm UTC
Re: A Pixelante by Definition, Since You Asked... - [info]ianc14, 2006-04-28 09:35 pm UTC
Re: A Pixelante by Definition, Since You Asked... - [info]beacon80, 2006-04-28 09:50 pm UTC
Re: A Pixelante by Definition, Since You Asked... - [info]bayushisan, 2006-04-28 09:52 pm UTC
Re: A Pixelante by Definition, Since You Asked... - [info]enmitywithin, 2006-04-29 02:09 am UTC
Re: A Pixelante by Definition, Since You Asked... - [info]kincyr, 2006-04-29 04:46 am UTC
Re: A Pixelante by Definition, Since You Asked... - [info]boffo97, 2006-04-29 08:38 am UTC
A Pixelante Is Vigilante... - [info]spitzeragenius, 2006-04-28 09:25 pm UTC
Re: A Pixelante Is Vigilante... - [info]yzzerdd, 2006-04-28 09:29 pm UTC
Re: A Pixelante Is Vigilante... - [info]jaykaos, 2006-04-28 09:31 pm UTC