Game Politics ([info]gamepolitics) wrote,
@ 2006-03-20 14:12:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:a.g.crowe, democrats, legislation, louisiana, republicans, roy burrell

Louisiana House Mulls Pair of "Games as Porn" Bills

You might think state legislators in hurricane-ravaged Louisiana would have more important issues on which to focus their energies.

But in a bi-partisan effort last week, a pair of video game bills were introduced by members from both sides of the aisle in the Louisiana House. The bills reprise two troubling themes for the video game industry. The first is the "games as porn" approach which has popped up recently in Utah and Delaware. In addition, the 25 to Life fallout continues as the Louisiana bills specifically reference violence against law enforcement officers.

Republican A.G. Crowe and Democrat Roy Burrell (left) introduced nearly identical pieces of legislation designed to add violent games to the list of materials barred from distribution to minors under the state's existing obscenity statutes.

Crowe's bill is HB254, while Burrell's is HB421. Both proposals would amend the definition of "material that is harmful to minors" to include a video game which "exploits or is devoted to... illicit sex or sexual immorality... that the average person applying contemporary community standards would find... presented in a manner to provoke or arouse lust, passion, or perversion..."

The bills also defines the following acts as covered: "the murder of a law enforcement officer, first degree murder, as well as various degrees of rape, kidnapping, terrorism, torture and drug offenses.

The Shreveport Times has a little more on this.




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(158 comments) - (Post a new comment)

And another
[info]jabrwock
2006-03-20 09:03 pm UTC (link)
And another set of politicians who use a contentious issue to buy votes. Apparently Capote is ok (it depicts murder), but GTA is not?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: And another
[info]jabrwock
2006-03-20 09:04 pm UTC (link)
How about Munich? It depicts the main character murdering people. Guess that's ok too...

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: And another - [info]panicbutton42, 2006-03-20 09:47 pm UTC
V for Vendetta - [info]jabrwock, 2006-03-20 09:54 pm UTC
Re: V for Vendetta - [info]panicbutton42, 2006-03-20 10:17 pm UTC
Re: V for Vendetta - [info]andrew_eisen, 2006-03-20 10:33 pm UTC
Re: V for Vendetta - [info]phoenixzero, 2006-03-20 11:26 pm UTC
Re: V for Video Gamer Stupid - [info]jackolantern1, 2006-03-21 01:58 am UTC
Re: V for Video Gamer Stupid - [info]goodrobotus, 2006-03-21 04:05 am UTC
Re: V for Video Gamer Stupid - [info]duncan_922, 2006-03-21 12:45 pm UTC
Re: V for Vendetta - [info]indystarx, 2006-03-21 01:04 am UTC
Actually, yes, you are trying too hard. - [info]jackolantern1, 2006-03-21 01:57 am UTC
Re: Actually, yes, you are trying too hard, Jack. - [info]beardoggx, 2006-03-21 02:06 am UTC
Jackolantern? So you're admitting that you're empty headed? - [info]indystarx, 2006-03-21 02:09 am UTC
Re: Jackolantern? So you're admitting that you're empty headed? - [info]indystarx, 2006-03-21 02:11 am UTC
Re: Actually, yes, you are trying too hard. - [info]spock_walk, 2006-03-21 02:12 am UTC
Re: Actually, yes, you are trying too hard. - [info]startropics, 2006-03-21 05:41 am UTC
Re: Actually, yes, you are trying too hard. - [info]getwellgamer, 2006-03-21 07:21 am UTC
Re: Actually, yes, you are trying too hard. - [info]viridiscervus, 2006-03-21 03:42 am UTC
Careful with that post - [info]timed95, 2006-03-21 04:16 am UTC
Re: Actually, yes, you are trying too hard. - [info]gatz111085, 2006-03-21 05:54 pm UTC
Re: And another - [info]phantompvp, 2006-03-20 09:10 pm UTC
Re: And another - [info]jabrwock, 2006-03-20 09:15 pm UTC
Too early - [info]jabrwock, 2006-03-20 09:21 pm UTC
Re: And another - [info]panicbutton42, 2006-03-20 09:55 pm UTC

[info]sqlrob
2006-03-20 09:05 pm UTC (link)
Violence has already been determined not to be obscenity by SCotUS.

Who's got the "Unconstitutional" stamp, and have you bothered to reink it?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]bigman_k
2006-03-20 09:30 pm UTC (link)
Yes, but politicians don't give a fuck. They keep passing these bills and they'll keep getting struck down and more and more taxpayers money is wasted in the meanwhile. It's too bad individual politicians can't be sued for proposing unconstitutional laws that have time and time again in the past been struck down.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]cyn1c42, 2006-03-21 12:02 am UTC
So....
[info]goodrobotus
2006-03-20 09:11 pm UTC (link)
One bill claims Video Games create lewd sexual activity, so films in which real women get naked don't count obviously, the other one is targetted on the aspects of approximately 5 games that allow the player to shoot law enforcement officers out of how many games on the market?

They single out computer games when films and books have been doing this for *years*. I have serious concerns as to why politicians etc are willing to turn a blind eye to movies etc when exactly the samr rules apply to them as to computer games.

Talk about selective reasoning, this is becoming more and more obviously an attention ploy.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: So....
[info]jabrwock
2006-03-20 09:34 pm UTC (link)
Talk about selective reasoning, this is becoming more and more obviously an attention ploy.

Pretty much. It was like jumping on the bandwagon of calling someone un-patriotic a few years ago... it's now the "in" thing to do.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

*slams head against desk*
[info]jdecamp
2006-03-20 09:14 pm UTC (link)
*slam* *slam* *slam* *slam* *slam* *slam* *slam* *slam* *slam* *slam* *slam* *slam* *slam* *slam* *slam* more bills? *slam* *slam* *slam* *slam* *slam* *slam* *slam* *thud* *falls on floor*

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: *slams head against desk*
[info]turbinerocks
2006-03-20 11:35 pm UTC (link)
Welcome to the latest straw man of both parties. Can't talk about anything important! That would require integrity. ;-)

(Reply to this) (Parent)

I would extend my condolences to you on your... - [info]jackolantern1, 2006-03-21 01:55 am UTC
Re: I would extend my condolences to you on your... - [info]baconninja, 2006-03-21 03:02 am UTC
Re: I would extend my condolences to you on your... - [info]xenosphobatic, 2006-03-21 03:14 am UTC
Re: I would extend my condolences to you on your... - [info]tonyselby, 2006-03-21 04:13 am UTC
Re: I would extend my condolences to you on your... - [info]illspirit, 2006-03-21 04:25 am UTC
Re: I would extend my condolences to you on your... - [info]enmitywithin, 2006-03-21 04:59 am UTC
Re: I would extend my condolences to you on your... - [info]getwellgamer, 2006-03-21 07:25 am UTC
Re: I would extend my condolences to you on your... - [info]xlorep_darkhelm, 2006-03-22 12:24 am UTC
Re: I would extend my condolences to you on your... - [info]jdecamp, 2006-03-22 05:08 pm UTC
Re: I would extend my condolences to you on your... - [info]mr_putter, 2006-03-23 10:46 pm UTC

[info]jindewinter
2006-03-20 09:30 pm UTC (link)
Because right now violent video games are a major concern for the people in Louisiana? I figure this is just to try and get them votes after how bad the officals fucked up with the hurricane.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]xenosphobatic
2006-03-21 03:12 am UTC (link)
Life moves on, and keep in mind that the hurricanes only damaged the southern part of the state. For the most part, if it's not on the gulf coast, it's sitting pretty.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]bigman_k
2006-03-20 09:34 pm UTC (link)
..."State lawmakers next week will return to the Capitol to again look at legislation dealing with hurricane damage in south Louisiana, but they'll also tackle issues ranging from the serious to the frivolous."...

The "games as porn" bills give good meaning to the latter.

(Reply to this)

Bad time to be an incumbent pol in Louisiana
[info]verbinator
2006-03-20 09:36 pm UTC (link)
I would imagine that incumbent politicians at all levels in Louisiana are desperate to find any issue that will make voters forget about who who responsible for the handling of all the issues surrounding Katrina. They need smoke and mirrors!! Right now, the timing may be good for local primaries and making the incumbents look good on "moral" issues. If they time things out, the eventually successful court challenges will come AFTER they are re-elected in November.

(Reply to this)


[info]viridiscervus
2006-03-20 10:01 pm UTC (link)
no, No, NO, NO, NO.
Not in MY state!

Weird how issues feel so much more personal when they're in your state.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

We're working on a bill to melt down all PS2's in your state...
[info]jackolantern1
2006-03-21 01:54 am UTC (link)
and we have your address and your platform's serial number. I'll be over in one hour, but don't take it personally.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: We're working on a bill to melt down all PS2's in your state... - [info]viridiscervus, 2006-03-21 02:23 am UTC
Re: We're working on a bill to melt down all PS2's in your state... - [info]cactusjack1999, 2006-03-21 02:45 am UTC
Re: We're working on a bill to melt down all PS2's in your state... - [info]viridiscervus, 2006-03-21 03:21 am UTC
Re: We're working on a bill to melt down all PS2's in your state... - [info]viridiscervus, 2006-03-21 03:23 am UTC
Re: We're working on a bill to melt down all PS2's in your state... - [info]cowboybeboper42, 2006-03-21 04:22 am UTC
Re: We're working on a bill to melt down all PS2's in your state... - [info]riffraff1138, 2006-03-21 04:51 am UTC
Re: We're working on a bill to melt down all PS2's in your state... - [info]samsoneffect, 2006-03-21 02:39 pm UTC
Re: We're working on a bill to melt down all PS2's in your state... - [info]goodrobotus, 2006-03-21 04:30 am UTC
Re: We're working on a bill to melt down all PS2's in your state... - [info]viridiscervus, 2006-03-21 05:12 am UTC
Re: We're working on a bill to melt down all PS2's in your state... - [info]enmitywithin, 2006-03-21 05:00 am UTC
(sadness)
[info]marbledog
2006-03-20 10:17 pm UTC (link)
I was wondering how long it would take for this insanity to hit my home state.

I compared the two bills side by side. There are three differences between the two:

1)The names of the bills are different.
2)The names of the promoting legislators are different.
3)HB254 has more commas than HB421.

THAT'S IT! Besides these things, these two bills are perfectly identical in every way. WTF?!

Fortunately, neither of these yahoos represent my voting district. You'd better believe I'll be in touch with my rep to kill this thing.

(Reply to this)


[info]raka
2006-03-20 10:19 pm UTC (link)
Boy I'm sure glad these politicians have their heads on straight. Putting money to push through an unconstitutional bill is a good idea. It's not like we have 3 months to the next Hurricane season or anything. We probably don't need -that- much protection from it.

...oh wait.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Don't worry, you are so inert...
[info]jackolantern1
2006-03-21 01:53 am UTC (link)
that a hurricane couldn't possibly blow you away. Relax.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Don't worry, you are so inert... - [info]bayushisan, 2006-03-21 02:00 am UTC
Re: Don't worry, you are so inert... - [info]xenosphobatic, 2006-03-21 03:16 am UTC
Re: Weak insult, Jacky Boy - [info]beardoggx, 2006-03-21 03:35 am UTC
Re: Don't worry, you are so inert... - [info]goodrobotus, 2006-03-21 05:09 am UTC
Re: Don't worry, you are so inert... - [info]talldan, 2006-03-21 09:21 pm UTC
I tell you what JackShitBag - [info]startropics, 2006-03-21 05:44 am UTC
Re: Don't worry, you are so inert... - [info]raka, 2006-03-21 01:36 pm UTC
That is not Jackie - [info]duncan_922, 2006-03-21 12:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]talldan, 2006-03-21 09:17 pm UTC
...
[info]solidsnark
2006-03-20 10:36 pm UTC (link)
I'm not sure that either of those trends is particularly disturbing to the industry. The courts haven't been sympathetic to the "Games as Porn" silliness or the content based restriction of "Violence against LE". While I doubt the industry as happy about the bills they should feel secure in the knowledge that should it pass it will undoubtedly be overturned like the rest of these ill concieved bills.

If there HAS to be an anti-gaming law, one that's blantently unconstitutional is the best kind. It'll be overturned easily and hopefully will reduce the desire for politicians to go down that route again.

(Reply to this)

Same old same old
[info]andrew_eisen
2006-03-20 10:42 pm UTC (link)
I’m still holding out hope that some politician will introduce a unique game bill instead of copy and pasting proven failures.


Andrew Eisen

(Reply to this)

Reminds me of that episode of Futurama...
[info]pixelante_ninja
2006-03-20 10:59 pm UTC (link)
where the rulers of that robot planet were organizing human hunts and anti human propoganda so that the citizens wouldn't notice the real problems on the planet.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Reminds me of that episode of Futurama...
[info]kurisu7885
2006-03-20 11:15 pm UTC (link)
That's pretty much what this is.

*after another hurricane* But Jack said video games caused hurricanes. Out hosuei s gone. *sniffs.*

Jack: Too bad. It was because your son is a gamer, so god hates you. I"m right, your'e wrong, Hooah!!!!!

(Reply to this) (Parent)

sorry to get all Jello Biafra on you here
[info]turbinerocks
2006-03-20 11:32 pm UTC (link)
Because everyone knows law enforcement officers are saints and would never deserve the ire of ordinary citizens.

If games are pornography, all art is pornography. Welcome to your police state. The conveniences you have demanded are now mandatory. I would imagine the first thing an astute police state would do is restrict any speech that reflects poorly on the police. ;-)

(Reply to this)

what a bunch of retards
[info]enmitywithin
2006-03-21 12:51 am UTC (link)
how many times does it have to be stated that games are not porn, and thus cannot be lumped as porn?

also, even if they do get the games barred, let's see how many people move out of there :)

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Actually, games that contain sexual material inappropriate...
[info]jackolantern1
2006-03-21 01:52 am UTC (link)
for minors is called "sexual material harmful to minors." It is banned in 43 states, which is why GTA: San Andreas was pulled off the market, remember? Do you all ever read the newspapers here? Jack Thompson

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Actually, games that contain sexual material inappropriate... - [info]kurisu7885, 2006-03-21 02:25 am UTC
Re: Actually, games that contain sexual material inappropriate... - [info]xenosphobatic, 2006-03-21 03:19 am UTC
Actually, GTA:SA didn't contain sexually inappropriate material - [info]jabrwock, 2006-03-21 04:19 am UTC
Re: Actually, games that contain sexual material inappropriate... - [info]illspirit, 2006-03-21 04:22 am UTC

(Deleted post)
Re: I purchased the Xbox version of San Andreas months after the "Hot Coffee" incident. - [info]redstormpopcorn, 2006-03-21 05:44 am UTC
Re: I purchased the Xbox version of San Andreas months after the "Hot Coffee" incident. - [info]beardoggx, 2006-03-21 05:49 am UTC
Jack's ignorance is truly stunning. - [info]getwellgamer, 2006-03-21 07:33 am UTC
Re: Actually, games that contain sexual material inappropriate... - [info]bennyboy371, 2006-03-21 10:59 am UTC
Re: Actually, games that contain sexual material inappropriate... - [info]xlorep_darkhelm, 2006-03-22 12:28 am UTC
Feh...
[info]kurisu7885
2006-03-21 01:24 am UTC (link)
I can see it now, Jack trying to get Ralph Baher[sp?] The inventor of video games as they are now, executed for running a conspiracy to distribute porn to kids since the end of World War 2, course, sicne Dr. Baher isn't responible for games as they are now, nothing can be done, and I doubt he expected it all to get so far.

(Reply to this)

The video game industry can regulate itself
[info]expert_gamer
2006-03-21 01:31 am UTC (link)
Yesterday I went to my local Target with my mom to buy the game God of War, which is rated M. When I went to the cashier with the game, with my mom being no where in sight, he asked me if I had an ID. Even though I had a school ID and a military ID (because my dad was in the navy) I said I didn't have an ID because it would be pointless since I am 16. He told me that he could not sell the game to me so I told him I'll be right back. I told my mom that I needed her in order to get a game, and she said if I needed her in order to get a game, then I shouldn't be getting the game. Then I reminded her that I am a mature person (which she somehow keeps forgetting). When I came back to the register I had my mom with me and when I tried to buy it this time, cashier asked my mom for her ID (which is ridiculous because she is almost 50 years old and there is no reason why he should need to see proof that she is an adult). My mom let me get the game because she knows I am much smarter than the average minor, and I do not use games to train how to kill. My mom did not even bother with looking at the content description on the back (if she did she would probably be reluctant to let me have the game because it contains nudity and sexual content and for some reason she thinks sexual content is worse than violent content). Once I started playing the game I did not want to stop. The game is so addictive and entertaining it is almost impossible to put the controller down. The violence in the game makes Moral Kombat look like Power Rangers. The game dipicted images and scenes of female breasts which is really no big deal when you consider the fact that many paintings of Ancient Greece illustrate topless women and there are a countless number of movies that expose female breasts.

Anyways, from my experience, it seems that video game legislation would be pointless because of the strict policies that already exist in retail stores. Nowadays they make sure that they do not sell M rated games to minors because their jobs are on the line.

I think the age limit set for M rated games is bullshit though because it places high school students in the same category as small children, and by telling them that the content is inappropriate for them, you are undermining their intelligence. Only someone who was just born yesterday would think that violence in video games is okay to do in real life. But the policy for stores not to sell M rated games to minors is probably neccesary to prevent parents complaining to the stores about the games their child brings home (they still complain even though they are the ones buying them the games).

(Reply to this) (Thread)

You can't even regulate your own thought
[info]jackolantern1
2006-03-21 01:51 am UTC (link)
Senator Lieberman proved in January that roughly 40% of the time IDs are not checked. How bizarre that you would think your single, isolated experience is dispositive on the issue. Do you also assume that because you exist everyone in the world looks like you, too? Jack Thompson

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Are you KIDDING ME? - [info]gamepolitics, 2006-03-21 02:16 am UTC
Re: Are you KIDDING ME? - [info]redstormpopcorn, 2006-03-21 05:46 am UTC
Re: Are you KIDDING ME? - [info]duncan_922, 2006-03-21 12:53 pm UTC
Re: You can't even regulate your own thought - [info]expert_gamer, 2006-03-21 03:18 am UTC
Re: You can't even regulate your own thought - [info]enmitywithin, 2006-03-21 04:22 am UTC
Re: You can't even regulate your own thought - [info]attackgypsy, 2006-03-21 05:12 am UTC
Re: You can't even regulate your own thought - [info]bennyboy371, 2006-03-21 11:23 am UTC
Re: You can't even regulate your own thought - [info]samsoneffect, 2006-03-21 02:43 pm UTC
Warning....
[info]kurisu7885
2006-03-21 01:35 am UTC (link)
before he gets here, JAck is back, for the 14thor so time.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Warning....
[info]spock_walk
2006-03-21 01:44 am UTC (link)
Thirteenth and fourteenth, I believe. And I also believe he was banned from at least one of them.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

So Sorry that you can't handle the First Amendment - [info]jackolantern1, 2006-03-21 01:49 am UTC
Re: So Sorry that you can't handle the First Amendment - [info]spock_walk, 2006-03-21 01:59 am UTC
Re: So Sorry that you can't handle the First Amendment - [info]xenosphobatic, 2006-03-21 03:22 am UTC
Re: So Sorry that you can't handle the First Amendment - [info]samsoneffect, 2006-03-21 04:03 am UTC
Re: So Sorry that you can't handle the First Amendment - [info]enmitywithin, 2006-03-21 04:21 am UTC
Re: So Sorry that you can't handle the First Amendment - [info]goodrobotus, 2006-03-21 04:48 am UTC
Re: So Sorry that you can't handle the First Amendment - [info]ianc14, 2006-03-21 10:32 am UTC
Strange interpretation of the first amendment... - [info]thejccalhoun, 2006-03-21 02:53 pm UTC
Major Bad Scientific News for Video Game Industry. Hooah!
[info]jackolantern1
2006-03-21 01:49 am UTC (link)
http://videogames.aol.com/canvases/articles?id=20060224122509990001

Jack Thompson is delighted to help spread the bad news!

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Major Bad Scientific News for Video Game Industry. Hooah!
[info]kurisu7885
2006-03-21 01:53 am UTC (link)
Mr. THompson, I asked you in the last thread and I'm asking again, unless you can conduct yourself in a professional manner, back everythign you say up, not insult us as a whole, be respectful, and debate in a like manner, then please, leave. I'm asking nicely.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

What bad news? - [info]andrew_eisen, 2006-03-21 01:58 am UTC
Re: What bad news? - [info]cactusjack1999, 2006-03-21 02:37 am UTC
Re: What bad news? - [info]jabrwock, 2006-03-21 04:20 am UTC
Re: What bad news? - [info]bustermanzero, 2006-03-21 03:43 pm UTC
Re: What bad news? - [info]warpstarmstr122, 2006-03-21 10:10 pm UTC
Re: Major Bad Scientific News for Video Game Industry. Hooah! - [info]enmitywithin, 2006-03-21 04:20 am UTC

[info]fatcatlim
2006-03-21 02:04 am UTC (link)
Are we sure that the latest "Jack Thompson" nick here isn't just some random troll who just wants to piss us off? Or is in a way mocking the way how JT usually posts here?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]spock_walk
2006-03-21 02:05 am UTC (link)
It's the same email address, and Dennis acknowledges these past three accounts as Thompson himself.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]kurisu7885, 2006-03-21 02:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fatcatlim, 2006-03-21 02:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]marbledog, 2006-03-21 02:50 am UTC

[info]ss_ebonclaw
2006-03-21 03:36 am UTC (link)
What the JackLOLanterns and the like need to realize is that they're treating the issue as if it were some massive, international problem. It isn't. It's a problem mostly in America.

I'd guess that at least 1:15 people around the world, alive at this moment, have played video games at some point. That would be HUNDREDS of MILLIONS of people. I want to guess as high as 1:10, but that might be a stretch.

Now, by those estimates and the way Jack-o is going on about it, that would mean hundreds of millions of rampaging, murdering rapists are wandering the streets of almost every city on earth.

So, why is it that there's only been, at most, a few dozen incidents that even Thompson in his insanity can possibly point as being game-related? With only 4 or 5 of those even having any possible direct connection - and often having the games only be a bystander, used as a way to let off some pressure from the cooker before the individuals who are already deeply maligned crack - and almost exclusively in the US?

Outside the US, the worst cases tend to be in Taiwan and the like and are pretty much related to heavy use of MMORPGs. How many gaming-related deaths happen anywhere else in the world, even using Thompson's tenuous methods? Surely, if everyone who's ever played a video game is a hooker raping, cop killing psychopath, as JT would argue, then you'd see lots more of that kind of thing happening in Japan and China, wouldn't you?

The plain and simple fact is that the extremely vast majority of gamers(less than 0.01% off) understand the difference between fantasy and reality enough that they don't go off and do such stupid things. But, he'd have every last person in America believe that video games are the root of all evil since the day Pong launched.

It isn't an issue that video games are evil and cause violence in America. It isn't even an issue that the youths in America are getting more violent. It's a matter of a single fool playing the only trick he knows how to, to an aging audience who don't know any better, because in 10-15 years that trick won't have any effect, because the ones in charge of everything, will be the very ones who spent their childhoods in arcades and playing pong. He's just one of the many death throes of a dying age, trying hard to stay afloat as the next generation comes by to wash the inflexible, old ways down the drain, in favor of an age of flexibility and global communication and community.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]chuma
2006-03-21 03:52 am UTC (link)
The BBC did a poll of 8-12 year olds in the UK and 100% of the 2000 chosen said they had played computer games. This is what those like Jack dont understand, having never been brought up with such technology; everyone plays them and it is part of modern culture.

When he grows up enough to want to discuss the best ways of handling the more mature games aimed at adults then we should start responding to him. Until then, leave all his posts without any response. It will serve to infuriate him even more and also not allow him his "it's the 1st amendment" comments whilst knowing full well that's to do with government censorship.

The scary part is that its not just the elderly that are clueless, in my local game store I heard some woman saying "well they are all kid's games at the end of the day". If that doesn't understate why educating parents is the key, I don't know what does :/

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]pahsons
2006-03-21 03:52 am UTC (link)
Hahahahahaha. I can only imagine the brainstorming that goes into this.

(Reply to this)

Question.
[info]durlock
2006-03-21 04:07 am UTC (link)
Why 'Hooah'? It's not even a word, it's not even remotely cool sounding. The British Huzzah or the Marina HooRah sounds so much better.

I mean, what's the point of trying to end sentences with it, or putting it before your name too? It doesn't exactly have any context. We'd also probably try to remain witha bit of civility with you if you wrote like a normal human being instead of some 'AOL l33t haxx0r' that just learned that the word you contains the letters 'y' and 'o'.

I can only see this probably worsen too, soon, it'll be 'hooah' and then just 'ooh'.

Oh well.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Question.
[info]tonyselby
2006-03-21 04:18 am UTC (link)
the reason for hoahh is from Scent of a Woman, as jack did explain once long ago when he started using it, since he also views himself as a movie buff

now mind you Al Pacino's use of the Hooah is derived from the military use of it

(Reply to this) (Parent)

To Answer Your Question, Kind Sir.
[info]anjinsan
2006-03-21 04:23 am UTC (link)
He's a fucking idiot, mang. What the fuck chu think, eh mang?

(Reply to this)

Jack has broken
[info]cowboybeboper42
2006-03-21 04:26 am UTC (link)
What else could explain his childish actions (well, his most recent childish actions) here at GP? Haha, Jack. Are you so bothered by defeat that you have resorted to the tired antics of a child armed with the Internet?
Hope this stuff finds its way to Wikipedia. Hell, I hope it gets to the Florida Bar.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Jack has broken
[info]goodrobotus
2006-03-21 04:38 am UTC (link)
I certainly think his comment 'I love the smell of Burning Gamer's Moms in the evening' should make it's way to them.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Jack has broken - [info]durlock, 2006-03-21 04:43 am UTC
Re: Jack has broken - [info]goodrobotus, 2006-03-21 05:13 am UTC

(158 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…