Game Politics ([info]gamepolitics) wrote,
@ 2006-02-27 07:30:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:6-abc, action news, david long, eisen, gamer dad, hype, internet safety, keith dunn, negative stereotypes, nintendo, nintendo ds, nydia han, pictochat, sweeps month

T.V. Ratings vs. Truth in Sensationalized Nintendo DS Report

February is a sweeps month for American television stations. Perhaps that helps explain why one local news program in Philadelphia hyped the Nintendo DS handheld as a potential tool for online predators.

But is the DS a lurking threat? You might think so if you caught this story aired by Channel 6 Action News.

The ABC affiliate reported that an 11-year-old girl was harassed while using Pictochat (seen at left), a simple program built into the Nintendo DS which allows users to send messages and doodles to their friends. Thankfully, the girl had the presence of mind to turn off her handheld and tell her mom when someone with an obscene screen name began pressing her for personal information.

"But it was scary to me as a parent that someone I don't know is talking to my child over what I consider a toy," said the girl's mother.

Internet safety expert Keith Dunn fanned the flames by suggesting that children are at risk when playing with Nintendo's WiFi-enabled handheld.

"Predators are using Nintendo DS anywhere in the world," said Dunn. "And it's going to be really hard to track down those individuals because of course, they're on a wireless network from a hotspot such as a coffee shop. Or if they're in a wireless environment, say a coffee shop or whatever, they jump on the wireless network so now you have predators who are trying to get at our kids."

Internet safety expert Dunn seems to be under the impression that the DS' WiFi capabilities are equivalent to those of a PC. They're not, as 6-ABC should have made clear.

In preparing her report, Action News Reporter Nydia Han called upon someone who, unlike Keith Dunn, actually understands the DS - David Long of GamerDad. Long explained in advance of Han's story how the DS actually works, including the handheld's built-in Pictochat application and WiFi. According to Long, none of what he told Han appeared in the report.

"I was at first sort of dumbfounded by the idea of a child being contacted by someone through Pictochat because it's not Internet enabled in any way," said Long. Pictochat users, he explained, must be within 65 feet of each other. (GP: and, Pictochat doesn't require a hotspot) "The most important point is that you have to be in that range, meaning you could probably see whoever it is you're talking to if you just got up and walked around looking for someone holding a Nintendo DS."

"Unfortunately, the story is written in such a way that nothing I said is made clear at all. The story essentially makes it sound like your kids can be contacted on the DS by anyone at any time and that you should beware of predators with Nintendo DS lurking on every corner and on the Internet... I'm both angry and disappointed... I'm glad my name wasn't included to bolster the ignorance in the article in any way."

Long also let Han know that Internet-enabled DS games ensure gamers only play against who they want by requiring players to exchange individual "friend codes" outside of online play. "I also explained that (online playable) Mario Kart DS doesn't even have the capability for chat of any kind. You simply connect to the game, race against the other people, and that's it."

"I wish the truth of how the DS works were correctly stated and the 'threat' of predators using it [to] contact your kids were explained properly."

Although Action News apparently did ignore key information in order to present a more sensational story, at the end of the day, a little girl was harassed by another Pictochat user. Is it a concern? Yes. Is it a very likely event? No. Did Nintendo - cognizant of its generally younger customer demographic - take significant steps to prevent harassment? Yes. Did Action News report any of this? No.

Hey, it's sweeps month.

-Andrew Eisen




Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>

(Post a new comment)

Just the facts, ma'am
[info]keddren
2006-02-27 01:53 pm UTC (link)
Let's not let a little thing like facts get in the way of good sensationalist media.

Mainstream newsies are getting more and more irresponsible by the day...

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Yeah, screw facts.
[info]startropics
2006-02-27 01:59 pm UTC (link)
Who the heck wants to get facts that are "truthful" these days anyway?

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]the1jeffy
2006-02-27 01:54 pm UTC (link)
Arrrrgh!

That is all.

Some lady at Wal-Mart (when I worked there) wouldn't buy her son a DS because it had an "internet chat" program on it. I told her it wasn't online, other than a local network. She obviously didn't understnad me and got angry. It's far too easy to lead stupid people around by the noses to sell ad dollars, rather than to educated them.

Luckily for the young boy, his mother finally understood that there was no way another person could send unwanted messages. She still didn't understand the fact that it wasn't an online program, but hey I couldn't build Rome n a day. Yay for technophobes!

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]tardis_chan
2006-02-27 04:30 pm UTC (link)
Some people need to stay AWAY from technology. ;P

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Better a technophobe than a luddite.. - [info]acroamatis, 2006-02-28 02:38 am UTC
But the Luddites were right. - [info]suigin_kou, 2006-02-28 11:13 am UTC
Surprised? No.
[info]temg99
2006-02-27 01:57 pm UTC (link)
Andrew: do not forget to mention that even if Pictochat was Wireless enabeled and could happen from anywhere, the Kid themselves whould have to connect to the internet from home. The Wireless predator cannot just randomly log onto their DS and start sending obscene images and text in the middle of a Zelda game.

Am i surprised at this? Heck no. Its well known that many locla news stations will do this just to sensationalize stories. The local ones here in Orlando do the same all the time. "Coming up at 11: Ther eis a danger in your house that could pose a significant hazard to you and your children. More at 11!"
The sad thing is, i bet the parents, like in all of the misinformed GTA reports, will believe this and possibly take away the DS's from their children. When are parents going to get through their heads to learn about the software and devices their children are using before tyhey give it to them? Its simple. Just read the damn manual and theyn will know 100% that this story is utterly sensationalized.

The only thing to fear is if this happened in a crouded area, like a mall and the predator told the kid to go to a cerain area using the Pictochat. Like:
"Hey! Come over o the Clothes racks at the back of the store!"
You get the idea. Thats very dangerous. But like Andrew said, they took nearly every means possible to prevent this. The kid is safer playing the DS than playing in their own backyard.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Surprised? No.
[info]kharne83
2006-02-27 02:30 pm UTC (link)
you know, once the Wifi netork went up, I wondered when a report like this would pop up. Apparently today's the day.

I don't see how this could be useful to predators. You'd need to have a DS, be in pictochat, and there'd have to be a kid with a DS in range who's also using pictochat, assuming your typical kid would rather play games than use pictochat, how often does that happen?

And then to top it all off, while the predator is sitting there waiting for that one-in-a-million scenario to happen, he's draining batter power! By the time he finds a possible victiom the battery will probably go dead.

The only game where this problem is even a remote possiblity is Animal Crossing. And since Animal Crossing requires friend codes, the only way a predator ccould bug someone there is if they were let in from the outside. That is, they were talking with the victom over the normal internet in the first place.

It doesn't work, and when it does there's no point.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]gimp_bizkit
2006-02-27 01:59 pm UTC (link)
Figures... the news is from my hometown too. Damn it.

(Reply to this)


[info]xenosphobatic
2006-02-27 02:06 pm UTC (link)
What's disturbing is that she WAS NOT contacted by someone over the internet, but by someone who was within her vicinity. This is, in my opinion, more disturbing since someone who is a predator in Los Angeles is not so much a concern to someone living in Philidelphia as another person who is actually less than 65' away. It's not that the person in LA isn't a threat, but the person who is in the same room as the user is so much more of an immediate threat.

There WAS a story there, but unfortunately sensationalist tactics ruined it.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]sir_bissel
2006-02-27 02:08 pm UTC (link)
I'd be more freaked out if the kids mom wasn't right there.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]xenosphobatic, 2006-02-27 02:45 pm UTC
Sad thing is.. - [info]acroamatis, 2006-02-28 02:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gamepolitics, 2006-02-27 02:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]squirrelofwrath, 2006-02-27 02:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kajex, 2006-02-27 07:22 pm UTC

[info]sir_bissel
2006-02-27 02:06 pm UTC (link)
Huh, people trying to mislead what exactly a video game system can or can't do by not giving all the information about it, making it seem more scary than it probably should be. Who would've ever guessed a news station would do something like that....

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]kajex
2006-02-27 07:24 pm UTC (link)
I like how the news pretty much reads "Nintendo Handheld Used As A Means of Sexual Stalking," rather than "Man Uses Handheld Console To Stalk Little Girl." As if Nintendo were to blame.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Video Games are stealing TV viewers!
[info]tconx
2006-02-27 02:06 pm UTC (link)
You buy a TV, but with the exception of a few shows (In my case, Family Guy, South Park, Simpsons, and the occasional CSI), the only thing you use it for is playing video games. The time you spend playing video games is time you're not watching real tv, and they risk losing ad dollars because of it.

Result: TV stations must make certain people... parents, fear what 'could' happen to their kids if they play video games...

Hum... I have an essay due Wednesday about, of all things, sensationalism... this article may prove useful...

(Reply to this)

I'm wondering
[info]stormewolfe
2006-02-27 02:07 pm UTC (link)
How does one become an Internet Safety Expert? Is there a course you can take for this? Apparently classes in logic and reason aren't part of the curriculum.

Also, “Action” news in itself promotes sensationalism. It’s much more popular for the reporter to further one’s own career by presenting skewed facts and opinions than report on all sides of the story, or the whole story at all.


(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: I'm wondering
[info]anticron
2006-02-27 02:59 pm UTC (link)
How does one become an Internet Safety Expert? Is there a course you can take for this? Apparently classes in logic and reason aren't part of the curriculum.

I'm not sure, but if there is a "license" of sorts, this person needs to have it revoked. He clearly doesn't understand the very thing he's lambasting.

That's much more dangerous than the DS ever will be.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: I'm wondering - [info]acroamatis, 2006-02-28 02:43 am UTC
Re: I'm wondering - [info]boffo97, 2006-02-27 09:49 pm UTC
Re: I'm wondering - [info]black_a_chan, 2006-02-28 05:17 am UTC
I can't help it
[info]kharne83
2006-02-27 02:09 pm UTC (link)
from a hotspot such as a coffee shop. Or if they're in a wireless environment, say a coffee shop

So many places, they could be anywhere! Like the coffee shop.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: I can't help it
[info]tollwutig
2006-02-27 02:39 pm UTC (link)
yeah ban coffee shops

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: I can't help it - [info]stormewolfe, 2006-02-27 04:44 pm UTC
Re: I can't help it - [info]black_a_chan, 2006-02-28 05:20 am UTC
I'd include the facts
[info]blitzfitness
2006-02-27 02:13 pm UTC (link)
because it seems that if someone really was harassing this girl, that means he was nearby. That bothers me a whole lot more than obscene messages.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: I'd include the facts
[info]matt0677
2006-02-27 02:28 pm UTC (link)
It's disturbing if the girl lives within 65' of a potential attacker, but all we know is that (a) the article is sensational and (b) somebody with an obscene username sent her something offensive.

My guess is it's her slightly older neighbour being a typical teenager. Just look at myspace.com to see how teenage kids behave when they think they've got anonymity.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: I'd include the facts - [info]the1jeffy, 2006-02-27 03:53 pm UTC
Re: I'd include the facts - [info]vaminion, 2006-02-27 06:05 pm UTC
Re: I'd include the facts - [info]matt0677, 2006-02-28 02:06 pm UTC
Re: I'd include the facts - [info]blitzfitness, 2006-02-27 09:05 pm UTC
Ignorance is incredible.
[info]evilfish28
2006-02-27 02:21 pm UTC (link)
I am still trying to figure out who in the would could have just "happened" to be in range of her when she decided to unse pictochat and why.

It goes to show you that during a slow month the media will try to sensationalize anything they can get their hands on to garner viwers (to make advertisers happy). Think about what the news has become; with the exception of NewsHour on PBS, all the news is anymore is a quick set of exciting sensationalized stories with 5 second soundbites. It is not so much iuformative as it is entertainment these days, which is quite sad.

Also, to repeat, the DS is the safest device to go online with. When you play Mario Kart, you are randomly matched with someone with no way to communicate either in text or voice, and when you are done playing there is no way to stay in contact since each 10-digit friend code is not visible. It's funny how they are referring to this guy as an "Expert."

Oh well, time to fire off an e-mail to him.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Ignorance is incredible.
[info]zippydsmlee
2006-03-02 06:47 pm UTC (link)
pretty much all I can stand news wise is Lou dobs and PBS news hour luo is fun to watch and is smarter than most entertainment news wantbes.
The news hour is pretty much how all ture news progrmas should be...but insted we get "the libs are comming for us" O'rilye and TV magizines poseing as news shows ><

(Reply to this) (Parent)

To be honest...
[info]lokiragnarok
2006-02-27 02:22 pm UTC (link)
I just sent them a complaint. There's really no excuse for this kind of thing when they got the opinion of someone that actually knows what they're talking about.

(Reply to this)

Never let the truth ruin a good story.
[info]godofyouall
2006-02-27 02:25 pm UTC (link)
Although some of Dunn's comments were obviously incorrect he did make a good point about parents needing to pay attention to what they're purchasing. Also at the end of the report they do admit that Nintendo said that you have to be within a range of 65 feet for connectivity. Although this story wasn't 100% accurate and sensationalized reports like this do not give all the facts hopefully if anything it will scare parents into paying more attention to what their kids are playing. Maybe this is not a bad thing after all?

(Reply to this)

sensationalism
[info]tollwutig
2006-02-27 02:41 pm UTC (link)
The exact reason I quit getting mainstream news from anywhere but NPR quite some time ago..

(Reply to this)

Truthiness
[info]angry_man
2006-02-27 03:10 pm UTC (link)
Sure, the facts say that the Nintendo DS isn't a capable tool for online predators to use, but doesn't it feel better to say that the Nintendo DS is the ultimate tool of online predators? In these times where it is obvious that video games are evil, we know that in our guts, the truth is that until a permit is required to have video games, our kids are never safe.

(Reply to this)

Real predator or fake predator?
[info]temg99
2006-02-27 03:11 pm UTC (link)
I agree that they did mention the 65 foot range. But they barely glossed over it in the "conclusion" of the story. It should of been something they mentioned right off the bat when talking about Pictochat. And like others have said here, i feel a far better story, sensationalized and interesting, is the fact that the person was in the same room as them.

But you know what, and im very sure this happened. They made the Pictochat session up! I mean seriously the cameras happened to be rolling videotaping the girl and her mom about this story when someone did this to her in a coffee shop? Seriously? Im more than betting that a off camera Crewmember was typing it in to up the sensational aspect of the story.

I do not have any proof, but the coincidence that they are there videotaping for this stoy and just happens to happen at that very moment? Commen sense says Fake.

(Reply to this)


[info]wxdiva
2006-02-27 03:14 pm UTC (link)
What's really disturbing is that they don't mention where the girl was when she was harrassed. Maybe the report should have focused on knowing where your kid is and who she hangs out with rather than using the DS as a scapegoat. Then again, media is all about scapegoats.

(Reply to this)


[info]blackwolfga
2006-02-27 03:29 pm UTC (link)
A couple of things I noted as "weird" when it came to this story...

...WHY DIDN'T THEY CALL THE COPS? I mean, seriously. Especially with the information provided to them by GamerDad, they KNEW that the sexual predator was in the same room with them. They had a news crew there. That could have been a breaking story - "ABC6 ACTION NEWS TEAM CATCHES PREDATOR WITH THE AID OF NINTENDO."

...WHY DID THE PREDATOR USE DS RIGHT THEN? I mean, come on. You're sitting in a coffee shop, and you see a little girl playing with a DS with a film crew around her. I know the first thing I would do when I see a little girl playing with a DS is to whip out my own DS (no pun intended) and start chattin it up in an incriminating fashion.

...WHY DID THEY INSINUATE NINTENDO WAS LYING? If you noticed, right at the very end, they used very incriminating word choices. "Nintendo claims that you must be within 65 feet..." But we all know that means that Nintendo's really hiding the truth, that a stalker can attack you via Pictochat ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD! Nintendo's just trying to save face...right? The news said so!

Granted, I know the answers to all these questions. There was no predator, it was a producer just off camera, the name really wasn't offensive, they just wanted to blur something out to make it more sinister, and Nintendo's story didn't match what Action News wanted to report on.

Could it happen? Yes. But, my advice is: if a predator happens to contact your child via Pictochat in a public place, call the police and have them search for DS's. You just cought yourself a criminal.

-Bobby Blackwolf
Host, The Bobby Blackwolf Show

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]the1jeffy
2006-02-27 04:02 pm UTC (link)
If you use a DS to fight crime, does that make you a Pixelante?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

In a word, - [info]riffraff1138, 2006-02-27 08:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nightwng2000, 2006-02-28 05:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]temg99, 2006-02-27 04:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]startropics, 2006-02-27 04:36 pm UTC
I'd buy that for a dollar - [info]carl_foust, 2006-02-27 09:00 pm UTC
Don't say "with ADD." - [info]suigin_kou, 2006-02-28 11:17 am UTC
Part 2 - [info]temg99, 2006-02-27 04:40 pm UTC
Re: Part 2 - [info]lecherousoldman, 2006-02-27 09:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]catch_33, 2006-02-27 06:44 pm UTC

[info]redstormpopcorn
2006-02-27 03:50 pm UTC (link)
No organization that calls themselves "Action News" should ever, ever be trusted for any sort of journalism.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]chrisswiss83
2006-02-27 04:14 pm UTC (link)
The problem is that for far too many people, this is actually a source of information.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]wxdiva, 2006-02-27 05:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mrflibble, 2006-02-27 11:17 pm UTC

[info]marbledog
2006-02-27 04:10 pm UTC (link)
I loved this quote from the report:

Internet safety expert Keith Dunn says parents need to teach their children to apply stranger danger rules to every and any situation. "Don't talk to strangers in game rooms if you don't know they're your friends. Don't talk to anyone. Just stop talking. Stop chatting in the game room."

Don't go outside! Lock the doors! Stay in your bed! Hide under the blankets! The world is scary! Boogedie-boogedie-boogedie!

(Reply to this) (Thread)

As if we needed to perpetrate "Stranger Danger" any further.
[info]startropics
2006-02-27 04:41 pm UTC (link)
I thought that project died. They spent a shitload of money to educate kids about the dangers of 1% of the population (The scary trenchcoat wearing kind) and left them more exposed to the other 99% (People they think they can trust, the shirt and jeans wearing nice people).

HOW THE HELL DO YOU MEET PEOPLE TO TALK TO IN GAME ROOMS IF YOU DON'T KNOW THEM? ISN'T THAT THE WHOLE POINT OF GOING IN THERE? TO MEET THEM?

mariomario45: heya!
princesspeach26: ...
mariomario45: what's up?
princesspeach26: ...
mariomario45: why rnt u saying nething?
princesspeach26: ...
mariomario45: hellooooooooo?
princesspeach26: my mommy says i can't talk to people i dont know
bowsergonnakillyoudead: Tell your mommy that she's full of shit. Just don't tell us your real name or where you live or what your phone number is or what you look like and you'll be fine.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]kilika_stryfe
2006-02-27 04:36 pm UTC (link)
Considering that Pictochat only works up to almost 100 feet, it shouldn't be too hard to find the person harassing you. But then again, parents only hear what they want to hear.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]temg99
2006-02-27 04:45 pm UTC (link)
It also does not work very well through walls. Sure Wifi conenction does, but not the Pcitochat is prety cruddy at it. So they guy was in the room with them. How the hell they could not see the guy with the big honking DS is beyond me.
[See above for my theories on this]

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]news_bot
2006-02-27 04:57 pm UTC (link)
Ugh, whats sad is that, it was probably one of her friends or her brother doing this XD

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]origamifrog
2006-02-27 08:36 pm UTC (link)
Or the neighbour's kid next door, or one of his friends, or anyone else, really. How do they even know it was a pedophile? For all we know, maybe all he saw was a girly username like sexykittenprincess6969 or whatever preteen girls name themselves these days, thought it was a woman/teenager around his age, and sent her a regular old A/S/L. I don't like jumping to conclusions based on a rather questionable article.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

To paraphrase an Internet cartoon featuring Metallica...
[info]empress_tigress
2006-02-27 05:04 pm UTC (link)
TECHNOLOGY... BAD!

FEAR... GOOD!

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: To paraphrase an Internet cartoon featuring Metallica...
[info]the1jeffy
2006-02-27 05:28 pm UTC (link)
BEER GOOD!

INTERWEB BAD!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]political_gamer
2006-02-27 05:28 pm UTC (link)
Being a (soon-to-be) journalist, I found this an abhorant case. I know at least everyone who is in the Print department at my college would agree. The goal of journalism, whether it is print, broadcast or online, is to find the truth about things.
Not only was this a case of the truth not getting in the story, it was purely to keep a fictional or mistaken narrative. I would be somewhat forgiving if this reporter didn't know about this, but to interview someone who is an expert and gives the actual truth and still ignore it, this reporter AND editor should be fired.
This is also a case where Nintendo could sue the station for slander. Normally, since Nintendo is considered a public entity, it would be difficult since they would have to prove actual malice (wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actual_malice), but it may be a case where Nintendo would win.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]thefremen
2006-02-27 05:35 pm UTC (link)
I think actual journalism died a while back. Nowadays we have the Fox network and The Daily Show has better research than most other programs.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tollwutig, 2006-02-27 07:04 pm UTC

[info]thefremen
2006-02-27 05:33 pm UTC (link)
I went ahead and emailed that Dunn fellow. Anyone who is a security "expert speaker" should be a bit more informed about security. Maybe he's the expert who decided that giving control over vital US ports to Dubai would be a good idea?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]the1jeffy
2006-02-27 05:39 pm UTC (link)
Oh no, not this. The Dubai corporation would in no way be responsible for ports security, even when they take it over. The Coast Guard and US Customs will still have that dubious honor. Arab phobia is not an attractive trait.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tollwutig, 2006-02-27 07:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]the1jeffy, 2006-02-27 08:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]thefremen, 2006-02-27 07:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]the1jeffy, 2006-02-27 09:01 pm UTC
Didja get a response? - [info]vansau, 2006-02-28 10:39 pm UTC
Re: Didja get a response? - [info]thefremen, 2006-03-01 12:08 am UTC

Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…