Game Politics ([info]gamepolitics) wrote,
@ 2006-02-16 09:44:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:broken promises, eisen, gamecloud, i'm ok, indian givers, jack thompson, modest proposal, thompsonsoft, yu

GameCloud Interview with Creator of Jack Thompson-inspired Game

Jack Thompson's modest proposal was answered earlier this month in the form of I'm OK, a side-scrolling action game described by Thompsonsoft's lead sprite artist Derek Yu as "kind of like Metal Slug, but with much worse graphics."

In an interview with Gamecloud, the 23-year-old Yu explains why Thompsonsoft decided to undertake their namesake's game design.

"Because the potential for comedy was just boundless. Thompson's design was vague enough that we knew we could add plenty of our own jokes. It was an opportunity to stick it to him really nicely and it couldn't be passed up."

Yu was surprised by the overwhelmingly positive response I'm O.K. received and estimates that it has been download tens of thousands of times. "We knew there was a camp that believed that the best way to defeat Jack was to ignore him, but we didn't know how large that group was. In the end, we had nothing to worry about. We've received countless offers for free hosting of the game and its soundtrack. People just want to help out. It's really wonderful, actually. The game community is tight-knit and very friendly when it comes down to it."

Thompson himself was less than impressed. "The creation of this "game" does not meet the terms and conditions of the Modest Proposal. Not even close; thus, no cigar."

"Didn't care one bit," says Yu when asked about Thompson's refusal to donate $10,000 to charity, "since we never actually intended to meet his "challenge." He's a coward, and one does not take a coward's challenge seriously. He has no intention of ever paying up, and we knew that he would find some way to weasel out of it."

Yu doesn't buy into the idea that violent games make for violent gamers. "I think if you're a person that's prone to violence, you will find a way to be violent, with or without the help of video games... Which isn't to say that I think playing violent video games is going to help. But in most cases of violence, I would say with certainty that there are other, much more relevant factors at work. Like Danish newspaper cartoons, for instance."

Will there be more games from Thompsonsoft in the future? "Ah, I doubt it. But you never know. My personal feeling is that Thompsonsoft is a bit of a one-trick pony. I don't think we could ever replicate the success of this game. Might as well go out on a high note than end in a whimper."

AE: Visit Yu's blog for more of his games and artwork. Also, check out a video of the game being played from beginning to end if you don't have the means or skill to do so yourself.

-Andrew Eisen




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]awel_cruiz
2006-02-16 01:01 pm UTC (link)
First post. HOOAH!

Did he say anything about Thompson's threat of litigation? "I'll be contacting these idiots' lawyers.", remember that?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Nothing concerning pending litigation.
[info]andrew_eisen
2006-02-16 01:57 pm UTC (link)
http://gamepolitics.livejournal.com/197980.html?thread=12683356#t12683356

Finally, the attorneys for these idiots will be contacted.

http://www.slutbear.com/thompsonsoft/

J.T., you've been a busy little monkey! I hear you've been talking to our host and posting all over Livejournal. Are you emo or something?


Andrew Eisen

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Nothing concerning pending litigation. - [info]artheleron, 2006-02-16 06:34 pm UTC
Re: Nothing concerning pending litigation. - [info]slyfoxx, 2006-02-19 02:54 pm UTC

[info]noll3095
2006-02-16 01:08 pm UTC (link)
You go Yu!

(Reply to this)

Good for Yu
[info]goodrobotus
2006-02-16 01:20 pm UTC (link)
If Mr Thompson didn't want to be ridiculed, he shouldn't have made such a ridiculous proposal.

Thanks for holding up a mirror to his hyprocrisy :)

(Reply to this)

Chalk up another point for the good guys
[info]enmitywithin
2006-02-16 01:38 pm UTC (link)
John, if you really wanted to prove us wrong, you should have set parameters like where it should be sold. that would stop it.

unfortunatley you didn't and as long as I pay for my copy of I'm O.K. then every single requirement has been fulfilled.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Chalk up another point for the good guys
[info]sir_bissel
2006-02-16 01:56 pm UTC (link)
If he -really- wanted to prove us wrong, he'd donate the money anyway.

After all, what better way to show the heathens the light than by example, no?

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]c13
2006-02-16 01:39 pm UTC (link)
But didn't Thompson say in response to the Penny Arcade thing that the "Modest Proposal" was a satirical work? If that's the case, then shouldn't he have said so in response to I'm OK as well?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]wedgetalon
2006-02-16 01:47 pm UTC (link)
I forgot where exactly he said it, but in an interview with someone he said that while it was satire, he would honour the offer if someone did meet the requirements. I think his actual phrasing was something like "an honest offer wrapped in satire" or some BS like that.

IMO, doesn't matter much anyway, because he's a tightass who wouldn't honour it no matter how strictly someone follows his guidelines.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]wedgetalon, 2006-02-16 01:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sir_bissel, 2006-02-16 01:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]acroamatis, 2006-02-16 05:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]surrealchris, 2006-02-16 03:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]c13, 2006-02-17 04:30 am UTC

[info]the1jeffy
2006-02-16 01:47 pm UTC (link)
Main Entry: sat·ire
Pronunciation: 'sa-"tIr
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle French or Latin; Middle French, from Latin satura, satira, perhaps from (lanx) satura dish of mixed ingredients, from feminine of satur well-fed; akin to Latin satis enough -- more at SAD
1 : a literary work holding up human vices and follies to ridicule or scorn
2 : trenchant wit, irony, or sarcasm used to expose and discredit vice or folly
synonym see WIT

^^from webster.com

Jack Thompson's Modest Proposal is supposed to be satire, as per Jonathan Swift. Jack's modest proposal is a sick mockery at best.

Jonathan Swift's master work, "A Modest Proposal," tells the story of a country overrun with hunger and poverty. He "proposes" that poor people would be taken into breeding shelters to make babies to eat, thereby solving the problem of overpopulation, poverty, and hunger. He is NOT serious. His serious calls for reform are contained clearly throughout his piece and are recognizeable by their validity. The rest of his proposal is so entirely outlandish that we must choose to ignore it in favor of his subtle points contained here and there inside the "Modest Proposal."

Jack's idea is indeed outlandish, and sick in the same vein as Swift's piece. But Jack Thompson never once has stated any valid ideas for reform anywhere, in his "piece." So his ideas are not satire in the sense of Swift's work. Satire - yes. Like Swift's work - NO. In poor taste - most definitely.

Way to go, Yu.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]sqlrob
2006-02-16 01:52 pm UTC (link)
He made a concrete promise in that "satire", which implies he is backpedaling.

If he didn't put any amount in (a simple "I challenge" instead of "I promise $10,000 to charity"), I'd have a much easier time believing it.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]silver_derstin, 2006-02-16 05:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]the1jeffy, 2006-02-16 08:21 pm UTC
Donation requirements fulfilled? No.
[info]andrew_eisen
2006-02-16 02:09 pm UTC (link)
I'll write a check for $10,000 to the favorite charity of...Paul Eibeler...if any video game company will create, manufacture, distribute, and sell a video game in 2006 like the following:

Video game company – Thompsonsoft (Thompson wouldn't consider it a true company)
Created by Thompsonsoft – check
Manufactured by Thompsonsoft – there’s no physical disc, box or manual to manufacture
Distributed by Thompsonsoft – online
Sold by Thompsonsoft – available for free
2006 – check
Like the following – check

Being the absurd human being that he is, Thompson has also repeatedly stated that because Eibeler has not named his favorite charity, the requirements have not been fulfilled. Odd that Thompson still has the audacity to question McCauley's ability to use a phone.


Andrew Eisen

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Donation requirements fulfilled? No.
[info]blitzfitness
2006-02-16 02:22 pm UTC (link)
Odd that Thompson still has the audacity to question McCauley's ability to use a phone

Ouch. Headshot!

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Steps to take... - [info]jabrwock, 2006-02-16 04:17 pm UTC
Re: Donation requirements fulfilled? No. - [info]tweek_20k, 2006-02-16 06:39 pm UTC
Re: Donation requirements fulfilled? No. - [info]s13scoops, 2006-02-17 11:38 pm UTC
Unfortunately, I see Thompson's scam
[info]boffo97
2006-02-16 02:32 pm UTC (link)
Jack said once that the challenge required the game to be in brick and mortar stores in the year 2006.

By the time he made the challenge, it was too late. Development time of a game from conception to being in stores tends to be a year and a half these days.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Unfortunately, I see Thompson's scam
[info]coffeejedi
2006-02-16 02:37 pm UTC (link)
I bet Yu could strike up a deal with a small local comic book/rpg/video game store to have a stack of cd's by the counter for $1 apiece; making sure that the store owners and clerks check ID before selling it.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Unfortunately, I see Thompson's scam - [info]jabrwock, 2006-02-16 04:19 pm UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
Re: And the interview of me for balance is going to be when?
[info]jindewinter
2006-02-16 02:52 pm UTC (link)
Did they interview you too Jack? Or are you going to write up another press release in response to this?

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: And the interview of me for balance is going to be when? - [info]fedule, 2006-02-16 02:53 pm UTC
Re: And the interview of me for balance is going to be when? - [info]sundaos, 2006-02-16 02:54 pm UTC
Re: And the interview of me for balance is going to be when? - [info]acroamatis, 2006-02-16 05:36 pm UTC
Re: Balance what exactly? - [info]beardoggx, 2006-02-16 02:58 pm UTC
Re: And the interview of me for balance is going to be when? - [info]sqlrob, 2006-02-16 03:07 pm UTC
Re: And the interview of me for balance is going to be when? - [info]duncan_922, 2006-02-16 03:13 pm UTC
Re: And the interview of me for balance is going to be when? - [info]ianc14, 2006-02-16 03:17 pm UTC
This post seems so sad. - [info]sir_bissel, 2006-02-16 03:19 pm UTC
"Balance"? Don't make me laugh. - [info]getwellgamer, 2006-02-16 03:28 pm UTC
Yeah, right... - [info]shadowkatamari, 2006-02-16 04:01 pm UTC
Re: And the interview of me for balance is going to be when? - [info]rhanlav, 2006-02-16 04:52 pm UTC
Re: And the interview of me for balance is going to be when? - [info]burntouttech, 2006-02-16 04:55 pm UTC
Re: And the interview of me for balance is going to be when? - [info]aniki21, 2006-02-16 05:23 pm UTC
To paraphrase; - [info]semperar, 2006-02-16 05:36 pm UTC
You mean you can't just line up another 60 Minutes interview? - [info]phantompvp, 2006-02-16 06:21 pm UTC
This is balance - [info]dog_welder, 2006-02-16 06:39 pm UTC
Re: And the interview of me for balance is going to be when? - [info]cowboybeboper42, 2006-02-16 08:11 pm UTC
Re: And the interview of me for balance is going to be when? - [info]razer_2mb, 2006-02-16 11:58 pm UTC
Re: And the interview of me for balance is going to be when? - [info]nozomu, 2006-02-17 03:56 am UTC
Agenda - [info]kharne83, 2006-02-17 04:42 am UTC
Re: And the interview of me for balance is going to be when? - [info]timbo2702, 2006-02-17 05:37 am UTC
Never. - [info]jaimas, 2006-02-17 08:35 am UTC
Re: And the interview of me for balance is going to be when? - [info]poet_ninja, 2006-02-17 09:20 am UTC
Re: And the interview of me for balance is going to be when? - [info]rohaq, 2006-02-17 12:32 pm UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
Re: Reality Check for Andrew Eisen and the Rest of You Nitwits
[info]jabrwock
2006-02-16 02:58 pm UTC (link)
But will just one of you nitwits call Take-Two and tell Eibeler I'm waiting for his designation?

What's the point, since you claim the "other aspects of the proposal have not been complied with, not even close"? Care to elaborate? They followed your storyline to the letter...

Why bother getting a charity name when we know you'll just go "well you didn't meet the proposal anyway, hooah!"

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Reality Check for Andrew Eisen and the Rest of You Nitwits - [info]sundaos, 2006-02-16 02:58 pm UTC
This load of crap is brought to you by the letter N - [info]jindewinter, 2006-02-16 02:58 pm UTC
Re: This load of crap is brought to you by the letter N - [info]sqlrob, 2006-02-16 03:08 pm UTC
... - [info]chibi_perdita, 2006-02-16 03:28 pm UTC
... - [info]sir_bissel, 2006-02-16 03:31 pm UTC
... - [info]sir_bissel, 2006-02-16 03:31 pm UTC
... - [info]duncan_922, 2006-02-16 03:35 pm UTC
... - [info]xlorep_darkhelm, 2006-02-16 04:24 pm UTC
... - [info]sqlrob, 2006-02-16 04:44 pm UTC
... - [info]aniki21, 2006-02-16 05:29 pm UTC
... - [info]riffraff1138, 2006-02-16 06:08 pm UTC
... - [info]tytazzytiger, 2006-02-16 11:59 pm UTC
... - [info]kiki_maru, 2006-02-18 01:21 pm UTC
Re: Reality Check For Jack Retard Thompson - [info]beardoggx, 2006-02-16 03:00 pm UTC
Re: Reality Check For Jack Retard Thompson - [info]tollwutig, 2006-02-16 05:50 pm UTC
Nitwit... - [info]goodrobotus, 2006-02-16 03:11 pm UTC
Re: Reality Check for Andrew Eisen and the Rest of You Nitwits - [info]ianc14, 2006-02-16 03:18 pm UTC
Re: Reality Check for Andrew Eisen and the Rest of You Nitwits - [info]sir_bissel, 2006-02-16 03:28 pm UTC
Re: Reality Check for Andrew Eisen and the Rest of You Nitwits - [info]mrflibble, 2006-02-16 03:40 pm UTC
Re: Reality Check for Andrew Eisen and the Rest of You Nitwits - [info]hexrei, 2006-02-16 03:44 pm UTC
Re: Reality Check for Andrew Eisen and the Rest of You Nitwits - [info]tollwutig, 2006-02-16 05:51 pm UTC
So, let's say we actually do call Take Two and get Paul Eibler to name a charity... - [info]shadowkatamari, 2006-02-16 04:05 pm UTC
Re: Reality Check for Andrew Eisen and the Rest of You Nitwits - [info]xlorep_darkhelm, 2006-02-16 04:22 pm UTC
Can't you read? - [info]tweek_20k, 2006-02-16 04:32 pm UTC
Re: Can't you read? - [info]acroamatis, 2006-02-16 05:42 pm UTC
... - [info]tweek_20k, 2006-02-16 06:15 pm UTC
Johnny boy.... - [info]silver_derstin, 2006-02-16 04:42 pm UTC
Re: Reality Check for Andrew Eisen and the Rest of You Nitwits - [info]burntouttech, 2006-02-16 05:01 pm UTC
Re: Reality Check for Andrew Eisen and the Rest of You Nitwits - [info]burntouttech, 2006-02-16 05:04 pm UTC
Great Idea! - [info]getwellgamer, 2006-02-16 06:33 pm UTC
... - [info]burntouttech, 2006-02-16 07:59 pm UTC
Wonder if the charity will be harassed - [info]larpguide, 2006-02-16 05:01 pm UTC
Reality Check for Jacko, Table for one! - [info]rhanlav, 2006-02-16 05:12 pm UTC
Re: Reality Check for Andrew Eisen and the Rest of You Nitwits - [info]aniki21, 2006-02-16 05:27 pm UTC
Re: Reality Check for Andrew Eisen and the Rest of You Nitwits - [info]aniki21, 2006-02-16 05:33 pm UTC
Re: Reality Check for Andrew Eisen and the Rest of You Nitwits - [info]artheleron, 2006-02-16 06:36 pm UTC
Re: Reality Check for Andrew Eisen and the Rest of You Nitwits - [info]chicito21154, 2006-02-16 09:30 pm UTC
I'm now a "nitwit" - [info]razer_2mb, 2006-02-17 12:12 am UTC
Rules - [info]kharne83, 2006-02-17 04:45 am UTC
I interviewed Jark Thomsen!
[info]jabrwock
2006-02-16 03:15 pm UTC (link)
The entity *I* talked to was a remarkable facsimile to someone we know...

J: So there's this game, "I'm O.K." that was made to mock your "Modest Proposal', any comments?
JT: They didn't meet any of the criteria!
J: Care to elaborate?
JT: No, do your homework junior.
J: Ok, whatever. So were they even close?
JT: They didn't even get a charity name from Paul Eibeler.
J: Is there even a point if they didn't meet the other criteria?
JT: Of course! I want them to call me again and again, and then I can keep shooting them down.
J: So, did you play the game?
JT: Of course not, I don't masterbate like you pixelantes.
J: That was rather crude, but whatever. How do you know they didn't meet the criteria if you haven't even played it?
JT: Doesn't matter, because they didn't. Hooah!
J: Uh huh. Ok, what about the website?
JT: I told the host they were harassing me, and distributing porn, and showing nipples and labia to kids!
J: Sounds childish. Are you going to do the same to their new site?
JT: New site? Curses! When will the internet stop harbouring these wannabe terrorists!
J: Yeah, why did I know this would be a waste of time, and not get me any new information...
JT: Hooah!
J: Whatever... *click*

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: I interviewed Jark Thomsen!
[info]sundaos
2006-02-16 03:21 pm UTC (link)
you forgot something, the "Modest Proposal" was nothing but satire, remember?

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: I interviewed Jark Thomsen! - [info]sir_bissel, 2006-02-16 03:21 pm UTC
Amazing, isn't it? - [info]jabrwock, 2006-02-16 03:49 pm UTC
... - [info]sir_bissel, 2006-02-16 05:36 pm UTC
... - [info]jabrwock, 2006-02-16 05:59 pm UTC
Re: I interviewed Jark Thomsen! - [info]rhanlav, 2006-02-16 04:54 pm UTC
Og Thompson interview? - [info]jabrwock, 2006-02-16 05:13 pm UTC
... - [info]rhanlav, 2006-02-16 11:39 pm UTC
Re: I interviewed Jark Thomsen! - [info]spudsey, 2006-02-16 04:56 pm UTC
Re: I interviewed Jark Thomsen! - [info]nightwng2000, 2006-02-16 05:30 pm UTC
Re: I interviewed Jark Thomsen! - [info]nightwng2000, 2006-02-16 05:31 pm UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
Re: I interviewed Jark Thomsen! - [info]bustermanzero, 2006-02-16 06:43 pm UTC
Re: I interviewed Jark Thomsen! - [info]wedgetalon, 2006-02-16 06:43 pm UTC
... - [info]bustermanzero, 2006-02-16 06:46 pm UTC
... - [info]otakuman, 2006-02-16 10:00 pm UTC
Re: I interviewed Jark Thomsen! - [info]chibi_perdita, 2006-02-16 06:48 pm UTC
Re: I interviewed Jark Thomsen! - [info]burntouttech, 2006-02-16 06:51 pm UTC
Can you say DUH!! - [info]tollwutig, 2006-02-16 06:51 pm UTC
I'm ceratin he's trembling on his boots! - [info]duncan_922, 2006-02-16 07:04 pm UTC
Re: I interviewed Jark Thomsen! - [info]bustermanzero, 2006-02-16 07:10 pm UTC
Re: I interviewed Jark Thomsen! - [info]ianc14, 2006-02-16 07:13 pm UTC
... - [info]mnementh2230, 2006-02-16 07:24 pm UTC
Re: I interviewed Jark Thomsen! - [info]goodrobotus, 2006-02-16 07:32 pm UTC
Learn read Laddy Jack - [info]jabrwock, 2006-02-16 07:46 pm UTC
Re: I interviewed Jark Thomsen! - [info]shatterjack, 2006-02-16 07:46 pm UTC
According to my clock, it's been an hour. - [info]riffraff1138, 2006-02-16 07:59 pm UTC
Re: I interviewed Jark Thomsen! - [info]semperar, 2006-02-16 08:10 pm UTC
Re: I interviewed Jark Thomsen! - [info]startropics, 2006-02-16 08:12 pm UTC
Re: I interviewed Jark Thomsen! - [info]cowboybeboper42, 2006-02-16 08:12 pm UTC
Liar! - [info]jarkthomsen, 2006-02-16 08:44 pm UTC
... - [info]mrpat___, 2006-02-16 08:46 pm UTC
Time's up. Now go back to your hole... - [info]tweek_20k, 2006-02-16 11:23 pm UTC
Re: I interviewed Jark Thomsen! - [info]mathsucks2, 2006-02-16 11:26 pm UTC
Re: I interviewed Jark Thomsen! - [info]rhanlav, 2006-02-16 11:41 pm UTC
Re: I interviewed Jark Thomsen! - [info]automancer, 2006-02-17 12:20 am UTC
Re: I interviewed Jark Thomsen! - [info]gasperskeltner, 2006-02-17 12:32 am UTC
... - [info]cecil475, 2006-02-17 01:08 am UTC
One hour? - [info]timed95, 2006-02-17 02:14 am UTC
Re: I interviewed Jark Thomsen! - [info]hilaryduffgta, 2006-02-16 10:17 pm UTC
The Onus - [info]sabin_blitz, 2006-02-17 06:13 am UTC
E-mail
[info]sir_bissel
2006-02-16 03:26 pm UTC (link)
Does anyone have any idea what Paul Eibeler's email address is? I figure we just either e-mail him and get the information or ask him to join up here and say what his favored charity would be. (Yeah, yeah, he probably won't, but whatever. After all, why not do all of Jack's leg work to prove him wrong?)

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: E-mail
[info]duncan_922
2006-02-16 03:38 pm UTC (link)
Because then he'll just say that his "demands" haven't been met. That there is no "boxed" product. That it's not developed by a big company, that it was satire, etc...

Remember, he doesn't have any money. He gets kicked out of his cases, and those that he hasn't, he hasn't won a single one!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: E-mail - [info]sir_bissel, 2006-02-16 05:12 pm UTC
... - [info]acroamatis, 2006-02-16 05:48 pm UTC
Re: E-mail - [info]finaleve, 2006-02-16 06:01 pm UTC
Re: E-mail - [info]jabrwock, 2006-02-16 06:26 pm UTC

[info]finaleve
2006-02-16 05:47 pm UTC (link)
Well, at least they werent expecting Jack "off"son to actually donate. A money power monger like him wouldnt probably give a quarter to the Salvation army if he really didnt need it.

(Reply to this)

Nobody is designating anything, Jack
[info]mnementh2230
2006-02-16 06:10 pm UTC (link)
Nobody will designate a charity for Jack, because nothing will happen because of it. Even if a game that fits Jack's ever-changing-criteria is released and sold in brick-and-mortar stores by the end of the year, he'd renege on his promise anyway, because that's just the kind of person he is.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(Reply from suspended user)
Re: Dear Moron - [info]wedgetalon, 2006-02-16 06:46 pm UTC
Re: Dear Moron - [info]mnementh2230, 2006-02-16 06:50 pm UTC
Re: Dear Moron - [info]mnementh2230, 2006-02-16 06:54 pm UTC
You just love those "Frontal Lobes" don't you - [info]skemodan, 2006-02-16 06:57 pm UTC
Dear Jack Moron Thompson - [info]duncan_922, 2006-02-16 07:00 pm UTC
Jack Thompson proves his own idiocy. - [info]shadowkatamari, 2006-02-16 07:32 pm UTC
Re: Dear Moron - [info]semperar, 2006-02-16 08:11 pm UTC
Re: Dear Moron - [info]ianc14, 2006-02-16 09:25 pm UTC
Gaps - [info]kharne83, 2006-02-17 04:53 am UTC
A message from a Christian gamer - [info]sabin_blitz, 2006-02-17 06:18 am UTC
Re: Dear Moron - [info]virgil0211, 2006-02-20 03:20 am UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
Re: Real, Not GP, Breaking News Re Jack Thompson
[info]bustermanzero
2006-02-16 07:11 pm UTC (link)
Jack, real news isn't about covering stories, its about uncovering the stuff behind them. If you think I'm wrong, take it up with the Ipsos-Reid polling firm and Pew Research Center.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Real, Not GP, Breaking News Re Jack Thompson - [info]getwellgamer, 2006-02-16 09:11 pm UTC
Re: Real, Not GP, Breaking News Re Jack Thompson - [info]mechanos_angel, 2006-02-16 11:34 pm UTC
You're a hypocrite - [info]razer_2mb, 2006-02-17 12:31 am UTC
Re: You're a hypocrite - [info]gasperskeltner, 2006-02-17 12:36 am UTC
... - [info]razer_2mb, 2006-02-17 03:01 am UTC
... - [info]gasperskeltner, 2006-02-17 04:20 am UTC
Tricky - [info]kharne83, 2006-02-17 04:55 am UTC
Re: Real, Not GP, Breaking News Re Jack Thompson - [info]rohaq, 2006-02-22 10:09 pm UTC
Re: Real, Not GP, Breaking News Re Jack Thompson - [info]artheleron, 2006-02-23 01:09 am UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
Re: Jack Thompson News, continued
[info]mnementh2230
2006-02-16 06:35 pm UTC (link)
I intend to prove just how out of control all of you are

Pardon me while I laugh my ass off.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Woo! - [info]getwellgamer, 2006-02-16 06:36 pm UTC
not news worthy - [info]sundaos, 2006-02-16 06:40 pm UTC
Re: Jack Thompson News, continued - [info]mnementh2230, 2006-02-16 06:40 pm UTC
Re: Jack Thompson News, continued - [info]sundaos, 2006-02-16 06:43 pm UTC
Re: Jack Thompson News, continued - [info]iu2002, 2006-02-18 01:27 am UTC
Still hurts that you got kicked out, doesn't it? - [info]duncan_922, 2006-02-16 06:41 pm UTC
Good one! - [info]odc100, 2006-02-16 06:41 pm UTC
Re: Good one! - [info]mnementh2230, 2006-02-16 06:46 pm UTC
Re: Jack Thompson News, continued - [info]fedule, 2006-02-16 06:42 pm UTC
Tick, tick, tick, tick... - [info]getwellgamer, 2006-02-16 06:44 pm UTC
... - [info]attackgypsy, 2006-02-16 06:47 pm UTC
Re: Jack Thompson News, continued - [info]attackgypsy, 2006-02-16 06:45 pm UTC
Defame, Jack? - [info]mnementh2230, 2006-02-16 06:45 pm UTC
Most amusing line: - [info]tollwutig, 2006-02-16 06:46 pm UTC
Funny you should mention confidentiality... - [info]tweek_20k, 2006-02-16 06:47 pm UTC
"I am tired of being treated like pig slop" Then don't behave like one. - [info]duncan_922, 2006-02-16 06:48 pm UTC
Re: Jack Thompson News, continued - [info]tollwutig, 2006-02-16 06:54 pm UTC
Re: Jack Thompson News, continued - [info]attackgypsy, 2006-02-16 06:57 pm UTC
You know... - [info]goodrobotus, 2006-02-16 06:56 pm UTC
Re: You know... - [info]tollwutig, 2006-02-16 06:58 pm UTC
I rate this a 93... - [info]dog_welder, 2006-02-16 06:58 pm UTC
You didn't think... - [info]the_attorney, 2006-02-16 07:41 pm UTC
... - [info]phantompvp, 2006-02-16 08:24 pm UTC
... - [info]the_attorney, 2006-02-16 08:33 pm UTC
... - [info]getwellgamer, 2006-02-16 09:04 pm UTC
... - [info]the_attorney, 2006-02-16 09:16 pm UTC
... - [info]getwellgamer, 2006-02-16 09:19 pm UTC
... - [info]goodrobotus, 2006-02-16 09:58 pm UTC
... - [info]dog_welder, 2006-02-16 10:03 pm UTC
Wow...idiots on the force - [info]skemodan, 2006-02-16 07:01 pm UTC
Re: Wow...idiots on the force - [info]tollwutig, 2006-02-16 07:10 pm UTC
... - [info]skemodan, 2006-02-16 07:15 pm UTC
... - [info]riffraff1138, 2006-02-16 07:22 pm UTC
... - [info]tollwutig, 2006-02-16 07:23 pm UTC
... - [info]skemodan, 2006-02-16 07:53 pm UTC
If it was that easy... - [info]boffo97, 2006-02-16 07:03 pm UTC
Re: Jack Thompson News, continued - [info]burntouttech, 2006-02-16 07:04 pm UTC
Freakin' ego maniac. - [info]sir_bissel, 2006-02-16 07:07 pm UTC
Re: Freakin' ego maniac. - [info]tollwutig, 2006-02-16 07:21 pm UTC
Re: Freakin' ego maniac. - [info]warpstarmstr122, 2006-02-17 01:16 am UTC
Re: Jack Thompson News, continued - [info]goodrobotus, 2006-02-16 07:51 pm UTC
Is Judge Moore's opinion... - [info]markstandridge, 2006-02-16 08:41 pm UTC
Re: Is Judge Moore's opinion... - [info]the_attorney, 2006-02-16 09:20 pm UTC
... - [info]markstandridge, 2006-02-16 09:52 pm UTC
Proof please? - [info]markstandridge, 2006-02-16 08:45 pm UTC
Re: Jack Thompson News, continued - [info]lordmalek, 2006-02-16 09:18 pm UTC
Re: Jack Thompson News, continued - [info]samsoneffect, 2006-02-16 09:47 pm UTC
... - [info]lordmalek, 2006-02-16 09:53 pm UTC
Jack is never wrong and never loses.... - [info]dog_welder, 2006-02-16 11:23 pm UTC
Wow. - [info]ithmarvin, 2006-02-16 09:30 pm UTC

(Deleted post)
Not this joke again...
[info]getwellgamer
2006-02-16 06:46 pm UTC (link)
Yes, we have. A thousand times.

The "66_" prefix isn't uncommon in that area. The Miami hospital we work with is 662, etc.

It was worth a chuckle the first time, but it is seriously, seriously old by this point. People, stop bringing up the "666" phone number. We get it. It's not funny anymore.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Not this joke again... - [info]sundaos, 2006-02-16 06:48 pm UTC
Re: off topic - [info]ithmarvin, 2006-02-16 09:31 pm UTC
Recent Polls
[info]bustermanzero
2006-02-16 06:45 pm UTC (link)
On a funny note, research conducted by Ipsos-Reid in Toronto and Pew Research Center for People and Press in Washington have shown that around 30% of people trust the media. That may seem low, but its still higher than the figures for politicians, lawyers, and car salesmen.

This begs the question: which is real news? That posted by a person who's job is news, or one who's less credible than the first? You decide.

(Reply to this)

(Reply from suspended user)
Re: GP Nitwits: Watch this and then get a life
[info]mnementh2230
2006-02-16 06:56 pm UTC (link)
Bah, not bothering. It's by the Christian Game Developers Foundation. They're obviously biased (just look at the name) and they subscribe to a belief system that I do not. Why should I care what they think?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: GP Nitwits: Watch this and then get a life - [info]bluejoshi, 2006-02-16 10:45 pm UTC
Re: GP Nitwits: Watch this and then get a life - [info]sundaos, 2006-02-16 06:56 pm UTC
Re: GP Nitwits: Watch this and then get a life - [info]goodrobotus, 2006-02-16 06:58 pm UTC
Re: GP Nitwits: Watch this and then get a life - [info]goodrobotus, 2006-02-16 07:04 pm UTC
OK Gumby... - [info]duncan_922, 2006-02-16 07:07 pm UTC
Re: GP Nitwits: Watch this and then get a life - [info]silver_derstin, 2006-02-16 07:07 pm UTC
That's what she said. - [info]sir_bissel, 2006-02-16 07:09 pm UTC
Re: That's what she said. - [info]tollwutig, 2006-02-16 07:13 pm UTC
... - [info]sir_bissel, 2006-02-16 07:21 pm UTC
Re: GP Nitwits: Watch this and then get a life - [info]ianc14, 2006-02-16 07:12 pm UTC
Ok, I watched it, because unlike you I'm willing to hear your side - [info]skemodan, 2006-02-16 07:13 pm UTC
Re: Ok, I watched it, because unlike you I'm willing to hear your side - [info]mnementh2230, 2006-02-16 07:15 pm UTC
Re: Ok, I watched it, because unlike you I'm willing to hear your side - [info]automancer, 2006-02-17 01:33 am UTC
Excuse me - [info]bustermanzero, 2006-02-16 07:14 pm UTC
Simple. So you can understand it. - [info]sir_bissel, 2006-02-16 07:15 pm UTC
Ok, seen it all the way through now.... - [info]goodrobotus, 2006-02-16 07:15 pm UTC
Re: Ok, seen it all the way through now.... - [info]braindead1, 2006-02-17 05:37 am UTC
Thank You - [info]blitzfitness, 2006-02-16 07:17 pm UTC
Thanks for sharing and proving my point - [info]andrew_eisen, 2006-02-16 07:24 pm UTC
Re: Thanks for sharing and proving my point - [info]mnementh2230, 2006-02-16 07:29 pm UTC
... - [info]goodrobotus, 2006-02-16 08:00 pm UTC
... - [info]semperar, 2006-02-16 08:59 pm UTC
... - [info]mrflibble, 2006-02-16 09:24 pm UTC
"Simply forbidding children from playing video games is not the answer." - [info]tweek_20k, 2006-02-16 07:40 pm UTC
Re: GP Nitwits: Watch this and then get a life - [info]semperar, 2006-02-16 08:23 pm UTC
Re: GP Nitwits: Watch this and then get a life - [info]imahori, 2006-02-16 10:47 pm UTC
Re: GP Nitwits: Watch this and then get a life - [info]illspirit, 2006-02-16 08:27 pm UTC
Re: GP Nitwits: Watch this and then get a life - [info]the1jeffy, 2006-02-16 08:41 pm UTC
Re: GP Nitwits: Watch this and then get a life - [info]duncan_922, 2006-02-17 12:11 pm UTC
Multiple problems with that video - [info]mrflibble, 2006-02-16 08:56 pm UTC
Re: GP Nitwits: Watch this and then get a life - [info]yzzerdd, 2006-02-16 09:24 pm UTC
Re: GP Nitwits: Watch this and then get a life - [info]ithmarvin, 2006-02-16 09:42 pm UTC
^What Andrew said - [info]skrunchster, 2006-02-16 10:01 pm UTC
Re: GP Nitwits: Watch this and then get a life - [info]bluejoshi, 2006-02-16 11:03 pm UTC
GET A LIFE, JACK - [info]razer_2mb, 2006-02-17 12:38 am UTC
Turn Around - [info]kharne83, 2006-02-17 04:58 am UTC
Re: GP Nitwits: Watch this and then get a life - [info]kroninokiller, 2006-02-17 06:57 am UTC
Watch this and then get a laugh - [info]thejccalhoun, 2006-02-17 01:39 pm UTC
I can't believe no one has mentioned this point! - [info]gamerdad01, 2006-02-17 05:21 pm UTC
Also notice... - [info]mr_putter, 2006-02-18 07:05 pm UTC
Re: GP Nitwits: Watch this and then get a life - [info]mr_putter, 2006-02-19 01:56 pm UTC
No one takes Jack seriously
[info]boffo97
2006-02-16 07:14 pm UTC (link)
Especially when he uses phrases in OFFICIAL communication as a lawyer like "you guys", "knock it off", "shut up" or "do your damn job".

BTW... Devin Moore is getting a fair trial. He's obviously guilty. HE is. Video games did not "make him do it."

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: No one takes Jack seriously
[info]mnementh2230
2006-02-16 07:20 pm UTC (link)
Very true. I especially liked this line:

...but I’ve learned really fast how your lawyers behave up there...

Come ON Jacky-boy, didn't your high school english classes teach you anything?

Would be better read as "...but I've learned very quickly how lawyers in the state of Alabama behave..."

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: No one takes Jack seriously - [info]tollwutig, 2006-02-16 07:24 pm UTC
... - [info]bluegus, 2006-02-16 07:42 pm UTC
... - [info]mnementh2230, 2006-02-16 08:51 pm UTC
... - [info]duncan_922, 2006-02-17 12:14 pm UTC
... - [info]getwellgamer, 2006-02-16 08:56 pm UTC
... - [info]semperar, 2006-02-16 08:58 pm UTC
... - [info]getwellgamer, 2006-02-16 09:21 pm UTC
... - [info]bluegus, 2006-02-16 09:23 pm UTC
... - [info]getwellgamer, 2006-02-16 09:34 pm UTC
... - [info]bluegus, 2006-02-16 09:55 pm UTC
... - [info]getwellgamer, 2006-02-16 10:13 pm UTC
... - [info]bluegus, 2006-02-16 10:30 pm UTC
... - [info]getwellgamer, 2006-02-16 10:50 pm UTC
... - [info]bluegus, 2006-02-16 10:52 pm UTC
... - [info]getwellgamer, 2006-02-17 09:54 am UTC
... - [info]bluegus, 2006-02-17 07:18 pm UTC
... - [info]getwellgamer, 2006-02-17 07:27 pm UTC
... - [info]tollwutig, 2006-02-16 11:39 pm UTC
... - [info]bluegus, 2006-02-16 11:44 pm UTC
... - [info]tollwutig, 2006-02-16 11:38 pm UTC
... - [info]tollwutig, 2006-02-16 11:37 pm UTC
I think we've seen enough insults
[info]tollwutig
2006-02-16 07:17 pm UTC (link)
Not to mention he's way off topic again.
Dennis can give Mr Thompson a vacation while he comes up with a new user name?

(Reply to this)

I love it how everything Jack tries to use is turned against him
[info]mnementh2230
2006-02-16 07:31 pm UTC (link)
Ok, the video he's just posted a link to has pretty well been thrashed (andrew_eisen did a marvelous job, and others have as well).

Can anyone remember something Jack's ever posted, either here or elsewhere, that actually supported his cause?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: I love it how everything Jack tries to use is turned against him
[info]tollwutig
2006-02-16 07:34 pm UTC (link)
I think thrashing Thompson's post can now be considered a Profession. Think I can claim a tax credit?

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Let me think... - [info]andrew_eisen, 2006-02-16 07:35 pm UTC
Re: Let me think... - [info]getwellgamer, 2006-02-16 08:52 pm UTC
Sources?
[info]ouroborous_19
2006-02-16 07:34 pm UTC (link)
I'd like to see the journals fro mthe APA their "research" is based on. You use a video that expresses that videogames increase aggression, but in previous news articles you've copy/pasted here, those articles have sources that see only a correlation and not a casual relationship between violent video games and aggression.

(Reply to this)

Just thought I'd spam it.
[info]l0que
2006-02-16 07:41 pm UTC (link)
Ban JT thread going on now in my LJ!!

(Reply to this)

New Interview with Jark Thomsen!
[info]jabrwock
2006-02-16 07:55 pm UTC (link)
JT: This is Jark Thomsen, I demand to speak to someone important!
J: What do you want this time?
JT: Who's this jackass Jack Thompson? I demand you make him stop impersonating me! He's a total fabrication!
J: He's some lawyer from Miami.
JT: You have one hour to make him stop pretending to be me!
J: Uh huh. I don't actually control what he says...
JT: Are you mocking me? You have one hour to apologize!
J: Or else what?
JT: EXACTLY! HOOAH! *click*
J: *sigh*


I'm still waiting for Og Thompson to just sent me a "cease & desist" as well... :P

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: New Interview with Jark Thomsen!
[info]l0que
2006-02-16 08:07 pm UTC (link)
haha wow. Gotta love that.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

I am Jack's complete lack of a sense of humor. - [info]riffraff1138, 2006-02-16 08:11 pm UTC
Re: New Interview with Jark Thomsen! - [info]nate_oo, 2006-02-16 08:36 pm UTC
Time's up munchkin! - [info]jarkthomsen, 2006-02-16 08:46 pm UTC
Re: Time's up munchkin! - [info]goodrobotus, 2006-02-16 09:00 pm UTC
... - [info]rhanlav, 2006-02-16 11:45 pm UTC
Re: Time's up munchkin! - [info]alexshido, 2006-02-17 01:57 am UTC

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…