Game Politics ([info]gamepolitics) wrote,
@ 2006-02-11 09:03:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:allran, bloomberg, callous rich guys, employment, greenwood, nyc, solitaire

Billionaire NYC Mayor Fires $27K Worker over Solitaire Game

Take your pick.

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg is either:

a.) really interested in motivating city workers to be productive

b.) a hard-hearted, rich guy SOB

Either way, it's a good bet that Bloomberg doesn't have much time for video games. GP readers may recall the mayor's failed campaign against Marc Ecko's Getting Up: Contents Under Pressure. Now comes word from the Associated Press that Bloomberg unceremoniously axed a low-level city office worker after he noticed Solitaire running on the man's computer screen.

The Republican mayor was visiting the Big Apple's legislative office in Albany recently, schmoozing with the worker bees and posing for pictures. While working the room, Bloomberg saw the ubiquitous card game on office assistant Edward Greenwood IX's PC.

Bloomberg said nothing, and posed for a picture with Greenwood. Later, hizzoner had an aide terminate the unfortunate bureaucrat from his $27,000 job.

"The workplace is not an appropriate place for games, he told the New York Post. "It's a place where you've got to do the job that you're getting paid for."

Greenwood, who worked in the office for six years, told the AP he limited his Solitaire play to his lunch times or during quick breaks.

"It wasn't like I spent hours and hours a day playing, because I had plenty to do," he said. "If I had been working at something exhaustively for two hours, I might get a cup of coffee and play for a minute but then go right back to my work... It's not like I'm the only one that ever did this," Greenwood said.

The 39-year-old father of a toddler said he wasn't angry with Bloomberg, but wished he'd simply been given a reprimand for a first offense.

"I admire the guy - he's a great financial success, and he has a definite management style," Greenwood said. "I just think he could have seen my situation and weighed the harshness of his final decision."

GP: Greenwood the Ninth is a much kinder person than GP would be in a similar circumstance. Not angry with the Mayor? Hell, I'm angry with him from a distance. With this heartless treatment of a minor disciplinary issue, Bloomberg joins the ranks of such game-phobic political luminaries as North Carolina State Senator Austin Allran, who wanted Solitaire removed from every single NC government-owned PC. BTW, a GP shout-out to reader Paul for alerting us to this abuse of power, er, I mean story.




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)

This is so wrong on so many levels.
[info]doggyspew
2006-02-11 03:05 pm UTC (link)
Being fired for just playing a game. The US has way too restrictive company policies, and no protective laws for workers. Here (The Netherlands) you only can be fired directly, when you do something illegal (Like stealing, or destruction of company property). Being fired directly over a game just can't be done, unless there is direct proof you ONLY play that game. This is not the case here.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: This is so wrong on so many levels.
[info]lampbane
2006-02-11 04:28 pm UTC (link)
New York State is an at-will employment state. It means that barring discriminatory reasons (race, sex, age, sexual orientation, religion, etc.) they can fire you for whatever reason, whenever. It may sound harsh, but it works in reverse too - you can quit whenever you want to, for whatever reason you want to, and you don't have to tell your employers why or give them two weeks' notice.

It sucks on some levels, but as someone who had to leave a crappy job in a hurry, it is also helpful.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: This is so wrong on so many levels. - [info]vivaciousvee, 2006-02-11 05:33 pm UTC
Re: This is so wrong on so many levels. - [info]lampbane, 2006-02-12 12:33 am UTC
Re: This is so wrong on so many levels. - [info]doggyspew, 2006-02-11 06:02 pm UTC
Re: This is so wrong on so many levels. - [info]butters66, 2006-02-14 09:05 pm UTC
Here we go again... Since we know....
[info]duncan_922
2006-02-11 03:10 pm UTC (link)
I thought I'd get the heads up on you Jack Thompson. You'll come here and say that our precious Take-Two/Games are going down. You'll come in and say that games are detrimental to the worlds economy and for that they should be banned. You'll come in and say that Mr. Bloomberg had already asked your advice for doing what he did and you will defend him court because you are an expert in the subject becase you appeared on CBS for 2 minutes talking about the subject of violence in video games. And you'll come in and say that we gamers must get a life, we are loosers, brain-damaged, etc. Then you'll make a few of your stupid "press releases" in the form of a letter to Mr. Bloomberg again mentioning how you are an expert on the subject because you were twice on CBS last year on the subject and you'll threaten him to do your bidding, or else! You'll also say that what Mr. Bloomberg did was right because you have spoken to an FBI agent who told you that Mr. Greenwood had a copy of GTA on his drawer and he was about to go on a murderous rampage! You'll also manage to throw the words "murder simulators" and "pixelante" around there somewhere. You will blame all the evils of this world on Blank Rome, Paul Eiber, David Walsh, Howard Stern, Janet Reno, Penny Arcade, MySpace.com, 2 Live Crew, Dannis McCauley, video games, video game players and people who post about video games, ad nauseam! And you'll throw in a Hooah for good measure!

Did I cover it all???? Yes??? Good!!! Let's move on!

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Here we go again... Since we know....
[info]jeremykpierce
2006-02-11 08:14 pm UTC (link)
That's not particularly productive on any given level. It's a little unnecessary.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Here we go again... Since we know.... - [info]semperar, 2006-02-11 10:47 pm UTC
Re: Here we go again... Since we know.... - [info]duncan_922, 2006-02-12 02:15 am UTC
Re: Here we go again... Since we know.... - [info]jeremykpierce, 2006-02-12 04:17 am UTC
Re: Here we go again... Since we know.... - [info]lecherousoldman, 2006-02-11 10:20 pm UTC
Re: Here we go again... Since we know.... - [info]acroamatis, 2006-02-12 06:03 am UTC
Re: Here we go again... Since we know.... - [info]kiki_maru, 2006-02-12 03:24 pm UTC
Re: Here we go again... Since we know.... - [info]duncan_922, 2006-02-13 12:41 pm UTC

[info]mrwaffle
2006-02-11 03:16 pm UTC (link)
I think some study or other showed that playing a quick game like this every couple of ours increased productivity by stimulating the brain and relieving the stress. Or something...

I would've claimed I was on my smoke break, personally. :P

(Reply to this)

You know when I read the title...
[info]pixelante_ninja
2006-02-11 03:16 pm UTC (link)
I was thinking he fired him because he lost, then I remembered solitare is usuaslly one player. :P
Yeah this is wrong, why are you going to fire someone for playing a card game once (well he only saw him play him once). Stupid politics, politicians, country, world, WGMMOT.

(Reply to this)

Ah, Bloomy again.
[info]suigin_kou
2006-02-11 03:21 pm UTC (link)
I live in New York, so I hear about this joker all the time. First it was the cabaret laws, then it was preventing people from smoking in bars, then it was attempting to fine Mister Softee for noise code violations (Yes, fining an ice cream truck for noise code violations. I can't make this kind of thing up), and now this.

I'm sure he's done a lot of good for the city, but the media, for its part, does what it can to portray Bloomberg as an out-of-touch skinflint Plutocrat, sort of like a real-life version of Scrooge McDuck. Bloomberg, for his part, apparently does little to dissuage people from believing this is so.

I mean, firing someone for playing solitaire? Even if that's not what's going on here, it certainly looks like it is.

I can't help but wonder what's next. Will Bloomberg someday run for President? We have at least two politicans here with their eyes on the throne, and both have about one ounce of sense for every ten gallons of ambition. Bloomberg's not much different.

What's wrong with this state, anyway?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Ah, Bloomy again.
[info]chadius
2006-02-11 03:51 pm UTC (link)
I go to college in Massachusettes for 5 years, and this is what happens to my hometown?

*explodes*

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Ah, Bloomy again. - [info]acroamatis, 2006-02-12 06:06 am UTC
Re: Ah, Bloomy again. - [info]suigin_kou, 2006-02-12 06:34 am UTC
Re: Ah, Bloomy again. - [info]sorakirei, 2006-02-13 04:16 pm UTC

[info]wedgetalon
2006-02-11 03:57 pm UTC (link)
Not only did the mayor fire this guy for something stupid and minor like that, but he didn't even have the balls to dit himself! If you're going to fire someone, don't pass the buck to someone. That kind of thing ticks me off. I could rant on, but it's a nice saturday and finally getting a nice snow here, so I'll stop before I ruin my day. :p

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]slayemin
2006-02-13 06:19 am UTC (link)
I'd also question the majors lack of balls for not doing it himself, but then he sounds like he was on a PR mission, and giving someone the axe on the spot would be opposite to the "feel good, feel comfortable" message he was trying to promote.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Bloomberg for being a billionaire has nothing to do with this
[info]pixelantesanon
2006-02-11 04:03 pm UTC (link)
While it makes great headlines, Bloomberg is not paying this guy's salary, but the New York City tax payers, like myself, are. I, as the person who is paying city worker's salaries, would be pretty upset, if my money was regularly used to pay for solitaire playing. Bloomberg being a billionaire, therefore has nothing whatsoever to do with this story.

That being said, I don't really agree with the firing at all, because the reason was anecdotal. Bloomberg had no way of knowing whether this person is a habitual slacker, or just on a short break, we all take at work. Nor did he know how hard this person works when actually working. What if the guy puts in 10-hour days regularly? He had no way of knowing.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Bloomberg for being a billionaire has nothing to do with this
[info]dusk_sylene
2006-02-11 04:06 pm UTC (link)
I agree. This man was fired because he LOOKED bad, and made Bloomberg look bad. It had nothing to do with his REAL job ethic.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Bloomberg for being a billionaire has nothing to do with this - [info]lampbane, 2006-02-11 04:30 pm UTC
I'm not so sure about that... - [info]gamepolitics, 2006-02-11 05:46 pm UTC
Re: I'm not so sure about that... - [info]rum_monkey, 2006-02-12 03:49 am UTC
Re: I'm not so sure about that... - [info]inabottle, 2006-02-12 04:36 am UTC

[info]silver_derstin
2006-02-11 04:33 pm UTC (link)
I can understand some disciplinary action taken on the guy, but FIRED?

That's a bit extreme, really. And if they don't want them to play the games, why don't they lock them up on the computers. Back where I worked in summer, we had to go on the INTARWEBS to play our solitaire games. Amongst other things...

(Reply to this)


[info]ovil200
2006-02-11 05:00 pm UTC (link)
That's not right...to an extent. I mean, sure, it's not like he was looking at porn or anything, but he should be doing his job, not be playing Solitaire (unless that's his job, heh).

Then again, if he only played it during his lunch breaks and other time off, then this is extremely unfair. Hey, don't you forget to exit out of stuff after you are done using it? People are HUMAN. They FORGET to do things. He could have simply been playing it on his lunch break and had forgot to exit out of it after he was done.

(Reply to this)

Games, Politics, and "You're Fired!"
[info]nightwng2000
2006-02-11 05:38 pm UTC (link)
Heh heh, had to do it. :)

Along the lines of having IT remove games from the computers of employees, I don't have a problem with it per se. If you're going to have a policy of no game playing, then don't have it available. Set Internet connection to have only access to sites required by the business, etc. Our company doesn't allow installing of any software that isn't installed by IT. An example is that some people wanted Instant Messengers, and they were already installed on the machines. When they realized they were being used, IT went around uninstalling it. No one was repremanded or anything. As with everything else, the place of business is the company's "house" and they can do what they like, even if we don't like it.

I also think Bloomberg is a bit of a coward. He saw the game and didn't say anything then. Not even taking the employee to the side and saying "Turn that off please and I want to see you in my office later" to get an explanation. Bloomberg even sent someone else to do the job (which is par for the course for higher ups in any business.)

I don't agree with the other poster regarding the broad statement that tax payers don't want city employees playing games at work. As long as it isn't abused, I don't see a problem with it. Like Greenwood said, he only did it at lunch and breaks. He's been there 6 years. If someone had noticed or reported abuse, the guy would have been gone long ago. I think he was just a hard worker taking a break at the wrong time (like someone else said, why do it when the mayor coming around? Wouldn't Greenwood have been given notice, even short notice, about the mayor coming?)

So, all in all, it's a crappy, rather uninformed decision that was badly made. There are better ways to say you don't want people playing games at work, at any kind of job. Set a written policy, have IT remove games from the PCs, etc. Making someone an example with such harshness only reflects badly on Bloomberg.

nightwng2000
P.S. Of course, it was hilarious watching the gang on ER playing, what was it, Doom? on the PC at the hospital against a group from another hospital. I'm really hoping this isn't the last year for them.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Games, Politics, and "You're Fired!"
[info]duncan_922
2006-02-11 06:10 pm UTC (link)
IT removing games from PCs is common practice. I work for a bank, and I remember that when I first started, some idiot VP thought it was a brilliant idea that we bought all PCs without CD-Roms to avoid people listening to music while working and increase productivity. This was wrong in so many ways, but there was no talking him out of it. Eventually, that decision costed us more money and the practice stopped.

But you gotta remember, everything you use at work, from the keyboard you use to the internet connection, belongs to management, and as such they are entitled to do with them as they please. This is what allows management to "monitor" all the employee's activities online. It is my job to do that where I work.

As for Bloomberg's action, even though he is entitled, they were exaggerated and unwarranted. The punishment did not fit the crime!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Games, Politics, and "You're Fired!" - [info]nightwng2000, 2006-02-11 06:36 pm UTC
Re: Games, Politics, and "You're Fired!" - [info]premo_maggot, 2006-02-11 07:50 pm UTC
Re: Games, Politics, and "You're Fired!" - [info]rum_monkey, 2006-02-12 03:59 am UTC
Re: Games, Politics, and "You're Fired!" - [info]duncan_922, 2006-02-13 12:44 pm UTC
Re: Games, Politics, and "You're Fired!" - [info]rum_monkey, 2006-02-15 05:40 am UTC
Re: Games, Politics, and "You're Fired!" - [info]rum_monkey, 2006-02-12 03:51 am UTC
Re: Games, Politics, and "You're Fired!" - [info]murdercrow, 2006-02-12 04:26 am UTC
Re: Games, Politics, and "You're Fired!" - [info]rum_monkey, 2006-02-12 05:26 am UTC
Re: Games, Politics, and "You're Fired!" - [info]nightwng2000, 2006-02-12 05:37 am UTC

[info]automancer
2006-02-11 05:54 pm UTC (link)
I think the thing that irks me is the fact that he only does it on breaks or lunches. Working at a job in a cubicle makes it hard for anybody to actually leave during a short break, so this type of thing seems relativily unfair to me.

-Auto

(Reply to this)

Games don't belong in the Workplace
[info]honkymcgee
2006-02-11 06:12 pm UTC (link)
Ok Mr. Bloomberg so games don't belong in the workplace. Are you gonna fire me for working at a Game Company because I build the levels of the game and then I play them.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Games don't belong in the Workplace
[info]verbinator
2006-02-11 06:56 pm UTC (link)
I also work for a game company. In an interesting contrast to this story ... when I shifted teams a couple years ago (design to art) my manager suggested that I get involved in the lunch hour (and basically every free minute they can get away with) playing of Desert Combat (now Battlefield 2) games in the art department. The only time we are not allowed to play games on breaks is when we are in scheduled crunch.

Regardless of his political affiliation (I've worked for jerks whose views lie across the political spectrum) Bloomberg handled this like an autocratic jerk. A reprimand would have been the proper course of action, right-to-work state or not.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Games don't belong in the Workplace - [info]inabottle, 2006-02-12 09:05 pm UTC
Re: Games don't belong in the Workplace - [info]verbinator, 2006-02-13 01:58 am UTC
Re: Games don't belong in the Workplace - [info]inabottle, 2006-02-13 05:04 am UTC
Re: Games don't belong in the Workplace - [info]darkesword, 2006-02-11 08:00 pm UTC
Re: Games don't belong in the Workplace - [info]rum_monkey, 2006-02-12 03:53 am UTC
Re: Games don't belong in the Workplace - [info]darkesword, 2006-02-12 09:06 pm UTC
Re: Games don't belong in the Workplace - [info]puffin_essence, 2006-02-12 04:01 am UTC
Re: Games don't belong in the Workplace - [info]darkesword, 2006-02-12 09:09 pm UTC
Re: Games don't belong in the Workplace - [info]acroamatis, 2006-02-12 06:13 am UTC

[info]synabetic
2006-02-11 07:05 pm UTC (link)
That guy should have smoked cigarettes on his breaks like everyone else, right?



I'm with the whole reprimand thing. Being fired over it is quite stupid.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]gamepolitics
2006-02-11 11:08 pm UTC (link)
yeah, or ate something healthy, like a donut...

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]synabetic, 2006-02-12 08:32 am UTC
Yeesh
[info]gray17
2006-02-11 07:41 pm UTC (link)
While the guy shouldn't have been playing games while at work if he wasn't on his lunch break, the first response should not have been to fire him. There are discipline options other than "throw them out on the street at first offense."

(Reply to this)

Everyone else has good points so...
[info]blitzfitness
2006-02-11 07:43 pm UTC (link)
Am I the only one shocked that there are 9 of this guy?

*useless comment, I know, so sue me*

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Everyone else has good points so...
[info]gamepolitics
2006-02-11 11:08 pm UTC (link)
That WAS pretty wild....

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Everyone else has good points so... - [info]sephirothpuppet, 2006-02-12 12:11 am UTC
Re: Everyone else has good points so... - [info]verbinator, 2006-02-13 02:01 am UTC
People seem to keep forgetting......
[info]kurisu7885
2006-02-11 09:01 pm UTC (link)
the guy only played games during his lunch and 15 or so minute breaks, never when he was supposed ot be working, and if just had stuff to write or paperwork to file, he prolly just left the game running, and thise waqs problably one of those times. That's my take anyway.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: People seem to keep forgetting......
[info]kurisu7885
2006-02-11 09:02 pm UTC (link)
And i forgot to add, thati s pretty much a model employee. I mean ,the guys who work on the show Mega XLR get alot of work done and game onlyo n breaks, and gamign is partly research, since the reference to games in the show.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: People seem to keep forgetting...... - [info]gray17, 2006-02-12 03:46 am UTC
Re: People seem to keep forgetting...... - [info]puffin_essence, 2006-02-12 04:14 am UTC
Re: People seem to keep forgetting...... - [info]gray17, 2006-02-12 07:32 am UTC
Yeah, he probably needed to be fired
[info]ouroborous_19
2006-02-11 09:11 pm UTC (link)
I work used to work as a network administrator and acommon policy was to restrict games like solitaire, flash (for duh flash games), and Java. Seriosuly, it's a bigger problem than "Oh he was JUST playing games." I used to also work at a blue collar/later white collar job at a semitruck parts plant. Secretaries and sales reps would always play games at times when work was stacking up. This meant I wasn't getting my raise for working hard in a 101 degree shop because work had clogged up so bad that profit margins actually fell.

Now, videogames for me are a recreational activity. If you're playing videogames during work you should either have your pay docked or be fired. The idea that Bloomberg should have taken lighter steps, well maybe, but the simple fact is is that the guy was wasting other people's money. Hell, I'd fire him, too if I thought I was paying this guy 27000 dollars a year to work just some of the time.

Bloomberg ( this feels so wrong, defending the actions of a republican when I'm a democrat) did more or less the right thing. Hell, I read about him and he seems like a pretty cool mayor, just takes it too far when it comes to beautification.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Yeah, he probably needed to be fired
[info]monte924
2006-02-12 01:50 am UTC (link)
I undertand what you're saying, but you should find a better example then those secretaries... taking a break is one thing, slacking off is another...

I mean, all this guy did was play a couple of games while taking a break... unless he isn't alloud to take breaks he took, then he didn't do anything wrong... The story mentioned nothing about him slacking off in his work, he didn't have work that was piling up... from what we can tell, he was getting all of his work done on time (which is what we expect of employees)... those sectetaries on the other hadn were slacking off... they were falling behind in their work and causing damage to the company, as well as causing trouble for everyone else... As long as this NYC employee was getting all of his work done on time then his game play during breaks would be doing no harm at all (his breaks don't help, but no harm, no foul)... its certainly not nearly enough too cause him to get fired... (minor warning, or punishment maybe)

Those secertaries were slacking off and deserve to be fired... he was not slacking off, got his work done, and did not deserve what he got

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Yeah, he probably needed to be fired - [info]rum_monkey, 2006-02-12 03:55 am UTC
Re: Yeah, he probably needed to be fired - [info]inabottle, 2006-02-12 04:42 am UTC

[info]bitmapzp
2006-02-11 09:13 pm UTC (link)
I do agree that the office is not a place for games. If someone is not inspired enough to ask what he should do in the downtime at work, he shouldn't be working that post to begin with.

Work and play are seperate. This isn't even an issue of whether games are good or bad, it's a matter of employee ethics.

(Reply to this)


[info]origamifrog
2006-02-11 09:25 pm UTC (link)
This is the kind of story that makes me happy that I work at a game company. I can play the game we're making during my breaks (and when testing changes that I've made, of course), and at lunch and sometimes on particularly slow afternoons, people play Xbox360, Xbox, PS2 or Gamecube games on the bigscreen TV in our games room. It's a really fun, casual environment, and I'm extremely happy that management doesn't try to suppress the love of games that brought most of us to the company in the first place :)

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Yeah, you lucky bastard
[info]rum_monkey
2006-02-12 04:02 am UTC (link)
Congrats on finding a job that understands that simulating your creativity is the priority for employees. Any openings?

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]inabottle, 2006-02-12 04:39 am UTC

[info]tyrillpaladin
2006-02-11 10:07 pm UTC (link)
Pff... I spend a good half of my workday goofing off. Luckily for me, I'm the best employee at the job I work at. I do more even with the amount I goof-off, than my coworkers do when they don't.

(Reply to this)

People die because of this
[info]baldynomad
2006-02-11 10:10 pm UTC (link)
Is this why Jennifer Sanmarco and Doug Williams gunned downed a total of 19 ex co-workers?(At a postal office and at Lockheed) Sure there were problems, psychologically with them. But employers and bosses like Bloomberg make sure that people have no outlet for them. Taking a little break and playing a game is ok. It should not have even been a punishment in my opinion. If Bloomberg didn't like it, well, too bad.

Perhaps we don't know the whole story, but my understanding from reading the news that this guy was not a slacker. So he took a break to play the game & cool off a bit. I would have no problem with an employee taking the occasional break and using tax payers money to do it because it's good for productivity. It relaxes you and calms you down. You know, instead of working long hours, getting fired for something stupid, then coming back with a semi automatic and killing co-workers. Or your boss. All because you couldn't take a break.

(Reply to this)

F***** up
[info]hilaryduffgta
2006-02-11 10:53 pm UTC (link)
im sorry but playin a quick game of solitare while u are drinking coffee or just taking a quick break is not a reason to be fired and this guy seems to have a bug up his ass for failing in his campaign or whatever it was for that mark ecko game.

Myself personally when i am working at a job and i have a break i just go and grab me a soda and a snack have a smoke or 2 and read a book somewhere were i can be left alone and not bothered with.Thats me though but this guy did nothign wrong and shouldnt have been fired simply because Bloomberg has a bug up his ass now

(Reply to this)


[info]ace_ofspade
2006-02-11 11:32 pm UTC (link)
I think it was kind of put in a way of "he thinks all games are bad" kind of way. Solitaire is really just a card game, and when I think of even computer solitaire, the thought of video games is no where in my mind. But the fact that he was outright fired is pretty stupid :P

(Reply to this)

PLaying games actually help productivity!
[info]alyasunkn0wn
2006-02-12 02:36 am UTC (link)
This is interesting, because I recall last year seeing a study that showed a direct link that playing games ( and most likely any genereal activity that might stimulate the brain) actually increase office productivity. I'm guessing a 15 minute break of playing solitaire (instead of say, smoking) would give the mind a nice break and while also subconsciously working on problems. Of course, there is the question of what the guy's function was. Given the low salary, he could have been simply doing menial work which didn't require much effort. No matter what though, I think someone is allowed to do their own thing during their breaks. If I want to play my DS during my lunch break that I'm not paid for, I damned better be able to do so without the risk of being fired.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: PLaying games actually help productivity!
[info]rum_monkey
2006-02-12 03:57 am UTC (link)
Yeah, i don't remember all of the study, but basically if you simulate different parts of the brain from time to time, you are more productive in your origional task.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]thefremen
2006-02-12 09:28 am UTC (link)
He should have been reprimanded. Come on man, the guy next to him sniffing coke only got suspended for a week.

Oh wait, I'm thinking of the Mayor of DC.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]thefremen
2006-02-12 09:36 am UTC (link)
Speaking of which, here's the thing that should piss any voting age American off: a low level employee playing solitare gets fired right off the bat, but the pres can get a blowjob on company time, take as much vacation as he sees fit (even during a national disaster) but not even get a dock in pay or suspended without pay or anything! Same with representatives: does anyone really expect that everyone who knowingly took dirty money from Jack Ambromoff will be punished in a fitting way? What about all the mud slinging that borders the line or even crosses the line of slander and libel? What about when the president has admitted to taking actions which, according to Republican Senators, is illegal?

Point is, the higher you are in the government the more crap you can get away with. Seems to me that was one of the reasons people didn't like living under King George.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…