Game Politics ([info]gamepolitics) wrote,
@ 2006-01-03 09:09:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:2005, california, legislation, person of the year, yee

GamePolitics Names 2005 Person of the Year

...and it is Leland Yee, California Assembly Speaker pro tem.

Because Yee has been a game industry critic, this is a choice that many in the gaming community won't like. As a longtime gamer, GP understands that viewpoint.

Leland Yee has, after all, been outspoken against video game violence. He is also the architect of his state's controversial video game law. That law, by the way, originally scheduled to go into effect on New Year's Day, was recently blocked via preliminary injunction by federal court Judge Ronald Whyte. The injunction indicates Judge Whyte believes the law is likely to be struck down on constitutional grounds. But whether California's game statute ultimately survives or not, Leland Yee was clearly the dominant political figure on the video game scene in 2005.

Unlike some other politicians who jumped on the bandwagon, Yee is no johnny-come-lately to video game content issues. Following the defeat of a similar bill in 2004, the licensed child psychologist once again introduced video game legislation into the California Assembly. And while GamePolitics doesn't see legislation as the answer, we can't help but admire the deft touch and political savvy displayed by Yee in guiding his bill though the complex legislative process. But Yee had help. Fate, fueled by Hot Coffee, played a huge role in percolating California's video game legislation.

So Leland Yee was both lucky and good in 2005. How lucky? How good?

There were at least two distinct points in 2005 when the California video game bill appeared to be dead in the water. In May Yee was one vote short of getting the bill out of the Assembly's Committee on Arts, Entertainment, Sports, Tourism and Internet Media. With a do-or-die vote looming, Yee engineered the makeup of the committee to ensure a green light.

In June Yee hoped to bring the measure to a vote on the Assembly floor. However a head count clearly showed his bill would be defeated, and he pulled it from the Assembly's agenda. At that point Yee's bill was stalled.

And then Hot Coffee exploded onto the scene - lucky for Yee, disastrous for the video game industry. Whatever one's views on the GTA San Andreas scandal, from a political perspective, Leland Yee recognized the possibilities, becoming the first political figure to speak out on the issue. The domino effect he touched off in Sacramento continued all the way to Washington, D.C. where no less a political star than Hillary Clinton added her voice.

How important was Hot Coffee? As Yee said during an October podcast interview with GamePolitics, "The industry did this to themselves. This bill was stuck in the Assembly, was not going anywhere... and then the Hot Coffee thing came out... it created a lot of suspicion about whether or not the industry could regulate itself."

Capitalizing on the momentum generated by Hot Coffee, Yee and his able staff resurrected and revamped the bill. The California Senate passed it 22-9 on September 8th and the Assembly followed a day later on a 65-7 vote.

But the biggest hurdle would be getting Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's signature. The Guv, after all, has deep professional ties to the entertainment industry and had himself been portrayed in several violent video games. As the deadline for signing the bill into law wound down, Yee turned up the political heat, recruiting heavyweights like Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich to urge Schwarzenegger to sign the legislation.

Yee's strategy worked. In a story broken here on GamePolitics, Schwarzenegger signed the bill into law on October 7th.

In retrospect, there was a David and Goliath flavor to Yee's accomplishment that can't be ignored. After all, this is California, the heart of the video game industry, a battleground state in which the ESA and industry players like Microsoft spent tens of thousands of dollars on lobbying efforts aimed at defeating Yee's bill.

But our selection of Leland Yee as 2005 Person of the Year is about more than just political clout. Unlike many politicians and activists, Yee is very much at ease interacting with the gaming community. And although he is not a gamer himself, Yee invariably speaks to gamers - and about gamers - with respect.

No wonder then that the tireless Assembly Speaker made himself available for interviews with a number of game publications and websites, including GameSpot, IGN, G4TV, GameTalk Live, and even GamePolitics. Most recently Yee sat in on a panel discussion of video game topics at Santa Clara University.

Thus, California Assembly Speaker pro tem Leland Yee is GamePolitics' first-ever Person of the Year.




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(108 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]mlaird
2005-12-31 07:58 pm UTC (link)
"Fate, fueled by Hot Coffee, played a huge role in percolating California's video game legislation."

Very nice use of words, GP. I like it.

-MjL

(Reply to this)

unexpected but good
[info]pixelante_ninja
2005-12-31 08:00 pm UTC (link)
well... that was unexpected, but he is the best person they've got and doesn't think we're lunatics, and will actually listen to our opinions, good choice

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: unexpected but good
[info]bustermanzero
2006-01-01 04:20 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, true. He's not nearly as misguided as the bandwagon jumpers. Still, I wish he hadn't blamed the entire industry for Rockstar's big screw-up. One might say 'don't shoot the messenger', but in this case it was the messenger's fault in the first place.

Yee's an okay guy. You have to respect him, but I still disagree with his views.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]ace_ofspade
2005-12-31 08:12 pm UTC (link)
:o

(Reply to this)

Curious, but understandable
[info]getwellgamer
2005-12-31 08:23 pm UTC (link)
I suppose in terms of impact and relevance, Yee certainly does stick out among the crop of me-toos and other attention whores in the gaming political landscape.

Interestingly enough, when I went to consider the flip side of the coin, I couldn't really come up with any names for people defending the games industry. The closest I could come up with would have been Hal Halpin of the IEMA, because he seems to be as close to a third party as you can get in this climate. While he's not from the ESRB personally, he stresses the adherance of the system to alll the retailers that are part of his organization (About 80% of all retailers nationwide) and emphasizes the fact that the breakdown occurs not at the corporate or regional level, but down to the individual cashiers at the point of sale.

(Reply to this)

I still hate the guy!
[info]bigman_k
2005-12-31 08:53 pm UTC (link)
I consider him the worst and most fanatical of all the anti-gaming politians out there (notice i said politians not everyone so Jack Thompson doesn't count). I think he's contradictionary as hell. For instance two years ago when he proposed this type of retarded legislation he said he hoped it would have retailers "pull the games off the shelf in general". Now he's just saying he just wants parents involved in their's children purchase of games despite the fact that he claim violent games are just as harmful to minors as cigerettes and alcohol are. So i guess Leland also thinks parents can give there kids alcohol and cigerettes if they so choose, right. It's one or the other Leland, if games are so harmful to kids then shouldn't kids be barred from playing the games regardless of whether the parents agree or not to it. Shouldn't parents be charged with child abuse and endangerment for letting them play such "Harmful" games. If he only wants to help parents as he claim to the gamers out there in his interviews with gaming sites then he should just say so and stop the bullshit about games being "harmful" to kids.
But of course if he did that he wouldn't have enough of a reason to get these bills passed because while helping out parents which isn't nessasarily a bad thing, if he did it for video games then he'd have to do it for every single thing out there that can be bought by kids because everything out there is likely to be found unsuitable and offensive in the eyes of some parents, whether it be Harry Potter books, Heavy Metal music cds, Magic the Gathering cards, Doungous (sp?) and Dragons RPGs, chocolate bars/potato chips and soda pop, or even the Holy Bible.

(Reply to this)

Good Choice
(Anonymous)
2005-12-31 09:19 pm UTC (link)
He seems to be actually concerned about children, and not just grabbing for votes. I aplaud his continuing efforts to protect children's minds...even if we dont want or need it!

(Reply to this)

blargh
[info]lac_intolerant
2005-12-31 09:35 pm UTC (link)
So he gets a prize for knowing how to manipulate the political system and being more suave and subtle than most politicians? And the fact that he's not a me-tooist bandwagon jumper actually counts against him in my book. He's not into this for political gain, but is one of the instigators of the whole gaming paranoia that others have capitalized on. If his theories had not been there in the first place, in conjunction with his political savy, the firestorm of controversy surrounding the gaming industry right now wouldn't be as heavy and ,dare i say it, idiotic.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: blargh
[info]bigman_k
2005-12-31 09:51 pm UTC (link)
..."And the fact that he's not a me-tooist bandwagon jumper actually counts against him in my book. He's not into this for political gain, but is one of the instigators of the whole gaming paranoia that others have capitalized on."...

I agree with that.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: blargh - [info]bigman_k, 2005-12-31 09:52 pm UTC
Re: Good Choice - [info]catch_33, 2006-01-01 01:45 am UTC
So...
[info]suigin_kou
2005-12-31 09:39 pm UTC (link)
... Yee is the Person of the Year because, through chilling effect, political power plays, and doubtless no small bit of deception, he almost torpedoed the game industry, promoted an agenda that eventually got warped into one of misdirection, misinformation and fear, and engineered a bill that would go on to be defeated in his state, then adopted and defeated in several others, costing taxpayers untold millions?

You might as well have ellected Jack Bruce Thompson for Person of the Year instead.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Based on Impact - not a popularity contest
[info]gamepolitics
2006-01-01 01:13 am UTC (link)
In picking Yee, I don't endorse or decry what he does. Rather I am saying that he had the most impact.

Kind of like Time Magazine's person of the year. Not always someone you might like or admire, but someone who had a major impact.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Based on Impact - not a popularity contest - (Anonymous), 2006-01-01 01:22 am UTC
Re: Based on Impact - not a popularity contest - [info]tsknf, 2006-01-01 01:25 am UTC
Re: Based on Impact - not a popularity contest - [info]catch_33, 2006-01-01 01:47 am UTC
Re: Based on Impact - not a popularity contest - [info]suigin_kou, 2006-01-01 08:10 am UTC
Re: Based on Impact - not a popularity contest - [info]pyrocy, 2006-01-02 11:29 pm UTC
Re: Based on Impact - not a popularity contest - [info]kingnat, 2006-01-01 12:35 pm UTC
I think Jack would have been jealous... - [info]kungfu_tse, 2006-01-03 11:07 pm UTC
Truer words have never been said...
[info]cashcleaner
2005-12-31 10:55 pm UTC (link)
..."The industry did this to themselves. This bill was stuck in the Assembly, was not going anywhere... and then the Hot Coffee thing came out... it created a lot of suspicion about whether or not the industry could regulate itself."

I would hope that before so many fellow gamers jump on any anti-Yee bandwagon before looking at the facts, they stop and think about what actions certain companies have taken in this industry to hurt the image of an entire demographic.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Truer words have never been said...
[info]bigman_k
2005-12-31 11:38 pm UTC (link)
Regardless, Leland Yee is still a douchbag.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Truer words have never been said... - [info]suigin_kou, 2005-12-31 11:46 pm UTC
You know it's not the only case... - [info]cashcleaner, 2006-01-01 01:14 am UTC
Re: You know it's not the only case... - [info]suigin_kou, 2006-01-01 01:37 am UTC
Well what can I say... - [info]cashcleaner, 2006-01-01 03:45 am UTC
Re: Well what can I say... - [info]kingnat, 2006-01-01 12:37 pm UTC
Re: I Don't Agree With This In The Least - [info]catch_33, 2006-01-01 01:40 am UTC
Re: You know it's not the only case... - [info]jesdk, 2006-01-01 02:12 am UTC
Oopsness - [info]jesdk, 2006-01-01 02:13 am UTC
They did just that, and that's never a good thing... - [info]cashcleaner, 2006-01-01 03:49 am UTC
Re: You know it's not the only case... - [info]illspirit, 2006-01-01 03:10 am UTC
Re: You know it's not the only case... - [info]godofyouall, 2006-01-01 10:45 pm UTC
Re: You know it's not the only case... - [info]illspirit, 2006-01-01 03:34 am UTC
Re: You know it's not the only case... - [info]jesdk, 2006-01-01 09:35 am UTC
Re: You know it's not the only case... - [info]illspirit, 2006-01-01 02:02 pm UTC
Re: You know it's not the only case... - [info]illspirit, 2006-01-01 02:43 am UTC
Re: You know it's not the only case... - [info]jesdk, 2006-01-01 09:45 am UTC
Re: You know it's not the only case... - [info]kingnat, 2006-01-01 12:44 pm UTC
All Hail Goliath!
[info]mrfalcon
2005-12-31 10:55 pm UTC (link)
Wow, what a guy! He didn't let silly things like obvious lack of constitutional merit stop him. And just because a lot of people didn't think it was a good idea, that didn't stop him from pulling out every dirty trick and wasting as much of the taxpayer's money as possible. As just when things were at they're darkest, he took a bizzare, isolated incident and used it to try to punish an entire industry. And in the end, he won't have succeeded, meaning that all the people that he conned into supporting this legislation were right in the first place. This is David and Goliath with rubber slingstones where Goliath eats David and all the other Israelites.

He's a politician in the worst sense.

(Reply to this)

I Don't Agree With This In The Least
[info]catch_33
2005-12-31 11:17 pm UTC (link)
Should have been somebody on OUR side.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: I Don't Agree With This In The Least
[info]pixelante_ninja
2006-01-01 12:52 am UTC (link)
but how many important people do we have on our side

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: I Don't Agree With This In The Least - [info]pixelante_ninja, 2006-01-01 12:53 am UTC
Re: I Don't Agree With This In The Least - (Anonymous), 2006-01-01 12:56 am UTC
Re: I Don't Agree With This In The Least - [info]tsknf, 2006-01-01 01:27 am UTC
Re: I Don't Agree With This In The Least - [info]funnydale, 2006-01-01 01:02 am UTC
Re: I Don't Agree With This In The Least - [info]catch_33, 2006-01-01 01:35 am UTC
Re: I Don't Agree With This In The Least - [info]kingnat, 2006-01-01 12:48 pm UTC
Re: I Don't Agree With This In The Least - [info]catch_33, 2006-01-01 11:36 pm UTC
Re: I Don't Agree With This In The Least - [info]kingnat, 2006-01-02 01:18 am UTC
Happy New Year All-even to the anti-gamers
[info]tsknf
2006-01-01 01:29 am UTC (link)
Well, Dennis makes a good arguement for why he picked him, and I think he's right.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Happy New Year All-even to the anti-gamers
(Anonymous)
2006-01-01 01:40 am UTC (link)
Ditto.

Good or bad, he has been busy.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Do not forget
[info]stormwardenace
2006-01-01 01:49 am UTC (link)
That Time Magazine once deemed Adolf Hitler as man of the year (for 1934, I think), because of the historical impact he had for good or for ill.

Person of the year nominees need not be on the "good guys" spectrum. They are people who, in this case, had an impact on the Game industry.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Do not forget
[info]catch_33
2006-01-01 01:53 am UTC (link)
I only agree with the selection of Hitler because he really did change the course of history, even though he was an evil bastard.

But Yee, no. Without Patrick Wildenborg, he'd be just another face in the crowd.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Do not forget - [info]kingnat, 2006-01-01 12:54 pm UTC
damn typos - [info]kingnat, 2006-01-01 12:56 pm UTC
Re: Do not forget - [info]grimm24, 2006-01-01 03:27 am UTC
Meh
[info]illspirit
2006-01-01 02:20 am UTC (link)
Patrick and/or Barton Waterduck should've been the person(s) of the year. Had they not found and released Hot Coffee, we probably wouldn't even be talking about Yee now. AB450 would have been dead in the water without HC, and the controversy surrounding Bully or 25 to Life would have been too little too late to put Yee or his bill back on the national stage. Not to mention the other laws and bandwagoneers HC spawned.

Otherwise, Yee is a good pick. He'd have most likely been my second choice. Or maybe tied with Jack.

At any rate, Happy New Year all. Something tells me that the coming year is going to get quite interesting...

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Meh
[info]pixelante_ninja
2006-01-01 02:33 am UTC (link)
Jack hasn't done much except be a poster boy and media whore, Yee actually got a bill through the process and almost got it into law using mainly one event

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Meh - [info]illspirit, 2006-01-01 02:21 pm UTC
Yee= Peson of the Year?!?!?
[info]grimm24
2006-01-01 03:25 am UTC (link)
I'm pretty sure there were lot of other people who would definitly deserve this award more than Yee, like Warren Spector, for his comments about Rockstar and how they handeled the Hot Coffee conflict.

Yee, is as worse as every other politician, who are more conserned about their own power and control than how to help protect children.

In my opinion, Yee is actully one of the worst politicians, considering his stubbern attitude about games and how they help benifit the world rather than cause massecure.

(Reply to this)

LAME
(Anonymous)
2006-01-01 04:29 am UTC (link)
Yee may have been the first politician to see the potential in and misrepresent Hot Coffee, but giving him honors for doing so(something an intern is no doubt ACTUALLY responisble for) is like having a parade for the first leper in your town. Yee doesn't piss on gmars like JT, no, but he is hardly an unbiased source, and every piece of his writing I have ever read is full of half-truths and unproved assumptions. He is a politician in every way that that word has been perverted and warped.

Also, I find it curious that GP acknowledges Yee's ideas and policies are misguided, but still gives him man of the year? How about giving it to someone fostering genuine debate, like the judge who revoked Thompson's Pro Hac Vice status....

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: LAME
[info]kingnat
2006-01-01 01:26 pm UTC (link)
His legislation predates hot coffee.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: LAME - [info]bigman_k, 2006-01-02 06:04 pm UTC
Re: LAME - [info]kingnat, 2006-01-04 11:41 pm UTC

[info]pixelante_ninja
2006-01-01 04:40 am UTC (link)
ah well, to all who are mad the world will still turn and legislation like his is going to get turned down, happy new years!

(Reply to this)

Poor CHOICE Dennis, Poor Choice
[info]yukimurasanada
2006-01-01 06:31 am UTC (link)
Though I could somewhat agree with your reasoning, YEE is in no way worthy of this item. If anything, This item shouldn't exsist in this case, simply because it's giving crediance to a doomed fight and the idiots who fight it.

If this should have gone to anyone, only three people deserve it.

Doug L. Just For putting up with JT's SHIT!

Judge Moore, for putting JT in his place.

The judge who struck down the illinois law.

You might give yee credit, but for what, being a scaremongering whore?

Give credit to someone who accomplished something, not someone who jumped on the bandwagon with an insipid and pointless law.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Poor CHOICE Dennis, Poor Choice
[info]mrfalcon
2006-01-01 08:58 am UTC (link)
Oh! I forgot about Judge Moore. I should have written him in.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

You know, this is just like Time's person of the year. - [info]doggyspew, 2006-01-01 11:20 am UTC
Re: Poor CHOICE Dennis, Poor Choice - [info]gamepolitics, 2006-01-01 01:41 pm UTC
Re: Poor CHOICE Dennis, Poor Choice - [info]yukimurasanada, 2006-01-01 07:05 pm UTC
Re: Poor CHOICE Dennis, Poor Choice - [info]jabrwock, 2006-01-03 06:11 pm UTC
Man of the Year?
[info]beardoggx
2006-01-01 06:43 am UTC (link)
More like one of the year's biggest assclowns, IMHO.

Judge Moore, Patricia Vance, Doug Lowenstein, or Bill Gates deserved man of the year more than the Poor Man's Beat Takeshi.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Man of the Year?
[info]gamepolitics
2006-01-01 01:32 pm UTC (link)
My thoughts...

Judge Moore isn't a political figure. His involvement is a one-timer, strictly random. And the case is far from over.

Bill Gates? I'm not seeing that one at all... explain?

As far as Doug and Pat. They both had a bad year. In my view the ESA sits back way too much, takes a far too corporate posture, allows itself to be seen as not caring about kids, values, etc. Who knows, maybe they don't. They allow themselves to be called all kinds of names by certain critics and - most importantly - they allow the critics to control the debate.

Pat Vance? The ESRB misplayed the Hot Coffee thing into the conflagration it became. They had a chance to get on top of it early on and instead tried to wait it out. Mistake, I think.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Man of the Year? - [info]beardoggx, 2006-01-01 02:22 pm UTC
Re: Man of the Year? - [info]nightwng2000, 2006-01-02 01:38 am UTC
Smear Campaign
[info]lac_intolerant
2006-01-01 08:59 am UTC (link)
Taken from the wikepedia article on him, Lee, "According to a San Francisco Chronicle article in 1999, Leland Yee was twice picked up for soliciting prostitution, but was not arrested.". This has absolutely no relation to the matter at hand, but i just felt like throwing him down from his champion of morality and defender of the children pedestal. I don't think the game industry has to take advice on sexually explicit material from a guy who apparently picked up hookers on a semi-regular basis (It can be assumed that he wised up after getting caught for the second time and was more discreet, or even that the he was caught only a small percentage of the time he paid for sex.
This is more a joke than anything else, please don't take it too seriously, as i believe smearing people's reputations is one of the lowest forms of political manipulation.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Smear Campaign
[info]kingnat
2006-01-01 01:02 pm UTC (link)
It's gone.
Someone noticed that it was only added recently and was almost certainly not based on fact at all.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Smear Campaign - [info]lac_intolerant, 2006-01-01 11:13 pm UTC
Ballsy choice...
(Anonymous)
2006-01-01 09:06 am UTC (link)
But it fits, I suppose. JT is right out, in my opinion. What did he do right during this entire year? Squat; the guy got bitch-slapped at every turn. Yee, on the other hand, seems to have actual success with his agenda (which, btw, seems to be rooted, at least superficially, in a little something called "Science". Yee has a Child Psychology degree, which is a LOT more than JT has. At least he can honestly be called an expert instead of a raving lunatic). Though I don't agree with his position, I agree that Leland Yee seems to be the most successful person in regards to game legislation this year.

Now if we had our act together, see, we could change that.

(Reply to this)

And the winner is..........Leland Yee WTF!!!!!
[info]godofyouall
2006-01-01 11:01 pm UTC (link)
You can't be serious Dennis, this is a joke right!

Leland Yee is just yet another politician who has jumped on the video games are evil bandwagon, nothing more. I would have even chosen JT over this ass-clown.

(Reply to this)

Yee
(Anonymous)
2006-01-02 06:59 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, I really hate this guy. He may be more successful then some of the other politicians, but without any sort of defining term for violence and sexuality or even a comittee to view and rate games, how can he keep proposing this bill? Just using the term "violent" doesn't work, I mean, Whack a mole is violent. And disney movies have sex jokes in them, doesn't that make them sexual. This whole non issue illudes me. How come a couple of seventeen year olds can see die hard, or schindler's game, or any number of the sexually EXPLICIT films that come out every year, like y tu mama tambien, or whatever, but they have to be 18 to see far less explicit and far lower quality on thier own TV sets at home. On top of all that, the kids most affected by this shit can't afford to buy the games themselves. Thier parents are buying them. Yeah, way to go Yee, spread the blame around, I mean it's not like these games that have this "ultra violence" aren't marked on the case.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Yee
(Anonymous)
2006-01-02 07:00 pm UTC (link)
schindler's list, lol, i mixed it with enders game. Stupid sci-fi invading my thoughts

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Leland Yee, assclown of the year.
(Anonymous)
2006-01-02 08:33 pm UTC (link)
How a person who lies and deceives the public can be called "Person of the Year" is beyond me.

And although he is not a gamer himself, Yee invariably speaks to gamers - and about gamers - with respect.

Are you kidding, Dennis?

"I expect that the entertainment industry will again spend tens of thousands of dollars to protect their own financial interests"

"Whether it is JFK: Reloaded, Manhunt, 25 to Life, or now Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas, the video game industry continues to demonstrate a sense of arrogance towards public opinion and a lack of responsibility in protecting our children"

"In a movie theater, if you walk in with an under-age child, there are all kinds of glares, whispering -- there may be someone so offended that they get up and see the manager and say, 'there's a child seeing an adult movie.' You can be sure the manager is going to come in and escort the child out and reprimand the parent. When you go into a video [game] store, you walk up as a young person, you pull that game off the shelf, you pay the money, you walk out -- nobody watches you, nobody's glaring at you. That's why in the theater the voluntary rating system works, but for ultra-violent video games, it doesn't work."

"Unlike movies where you passively watch violence, in a video game, you are the active participant and making decisions on who to stab, maim, burn or kill" Funny that he defends movies even though the same content can be found there. But the truth is he has received campaign contribution from the Motion Picture Association of America, and so he's a Hollywood sellout, and it's no wonder that he makes up every excuse not to attack the movie industry:

http://cal-access.ss.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1250804&view=received&session=2003&page=*


"However, since that bill passed many new games have been introduced, like Manhunt and JFK Reloaded, which are even more violent and more realistic." An obvious lie because his bill was actually signed into law AFTER the two games were released. In fact, JFK Reloaded is only sold on the internet and would not be affected by the bill anyway. What a dumbass this Yee is. I just love this quote:

"For the same reason we don't allow kids to buy pornography, cigarettes, or alcohol, we shouldn’t allow them to go to stores and buy video games that teach them to do the very things we put people in jail for – abusing women, joining street gangs, killing police officers, or even assassinating President Kennedy," said Speaker pro Tem Yee.

JFK Reloaded isn't sold in stores, dummy!

"Ninety-two percent of children play video or computer games, of which about forty percent are rated M." Another lie. Only about 12% of games were rated M, not 40%!

"The industry did this to themselves. This bill was stuck in the Assembly, was not going anywhere... and then the Hot Coffee thing came out... it created a lot of suspicion about whether or not the industry could regulate itself." That's strange because an animated, G-rated Disney cartoon called "The Rescuers" had an image of a naked woman deliberately put in there, but Leland never came out and blasted the movie industry and the MPAA. How come?

"We are confident that common sense will prevail over corporate profiteering on the backs of children."

Dennis, can you find me somewhere, anywhere, where Liar Leland actually speaks the truth and talks to gamers with respect? I have yet to find it!

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Leland Yee, assclown of the year.
[info]hilaryduffgta
2006-01-03 03:08 pm UTC (link)
""In a movie theater, if you walk in with an under-age child, there are all kinds of glares, whispering -- there may be someone so offended that they get up and see the manager and say, 'there's a child seeing an adult movie.' You can be sure the manager is going to come in and escort the child out and reprimand the parent. When you go into a video [game] store, you walk up as a young person, you pull that game off the shelf, you pay the money, you walk out -- nobody watches you, nobody's glaring at you. That's why in the theater the voluntary rating system works, but for ultra-violent video games, it doesn't work."


Yea i'd like to see someone in a movie theater come up to me and tell me i need to leave and blah blah blah if i feel like going with my 16 year old brother to go see that new horror movie that is coming out.cant think of the damn Name of it right now and they showed The Previews of it all weekend.The one where it shows someone holding a Wrench type thing and getting ready to rip off someone's toe.

as for yee Not blasting disney for that rescuers movie prolly cause it really is looked at now That children watch the news and espn and everything else so there is no point in going after a disney movie when kids no longer watch disney Movies.well that and they've said time and time and time again that movies hold first amendment rights and video games Do Not.

Tellin ya we live in the twlight zone

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Good Choice Dennis . . . .
[info]the1jeffy
2006-01-03 02:35 pm UTC (link)
. . . . . as evidenced by the debate here. Although it has degenerated into name-calling at times, Yee definitely sparks debate, to say the least. I personally think he's a fucking moron, but an influential moron, indeed. Just listen/ read the debate he was involved in recently, as covered by GP. He doesn't make a single intelligent point, and misses out on blatant sarcasm. (Or maybe ignored it?) But, as GP has noted, he is at the very center of this issue and got the most done to further his goals (which is sad, because in the long run, his bills will amount to nothing), and may have started the industry on a path that will be good for it. Violence and sex in games like GTA have little or no actual value. The industry (and not just R*) has a habit of doing things just because they can; without asking if they should do it. How is the best way to use the artistic tools of sex and violence? That is the question that needs to be answered by the game makers, not just how much sex and violence can we get away with?

Ok, I've rambled enough.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Good Choice Dennis . . . .
[info]hilaryduffgta
2006-01-03 03:10 pm UTC (link)
Did he ever happen to mention in that interview thing where he gets this insane notion that its ok for little johnny to watch the remake of texas chainsaw massacre but playing Gta is too violent for him cause i've always been lost on that one.its almost as confusing as when i heard someone say that Gta is more violent then Manhunt

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Good Choice Dennis . . . . - [info]illspirit, 2006-01-03 03:51 pm UTC
Re: Good Choice Dennis . . . . - [info]hilaryduffgta, 2006-01-03 03:55 pm UTC
Re: Good Choice Dennis . . . . - [info]the1jeffy, 2006-01-03 04:41 pm UTC
Re: Good Choice Dennis . . . . - [info]illspirit, 2006-01-03 06:15 pm UTC
Re: Good Choice Dennis . . . . - [info]jabrwock, 2006-01-03 03:53 pm UTC
The HOt coffee thing may be dead but. - [info]hilaryduffgta, 2006-01-03 03:59 pm UTC

(108 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…