Game Politics ([info]gamepolitics) wrote,
@ 2005-12-28 10:29:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:graffiti, philadelphia, psp, sony

Philadelphia Slams Sony For PSP Graffiti Marketing

The fallout from Sony's secret PSP graffiti campaign continues, this time in the City of Brotherly Love.

This morning's Philadelphia Inquirer reports that city officials plan to cite a property owner who leased wall space to Sony for its underground graffiti art marketing campaign to promote the PSP handheld system.

According to the paper, the city has strict billboard regulations which require a permit from the Department of Licenses and Inspections before putting up an advertisement. Neither Sony nor the property owners obtained such permits.

Fred Wolfson, whose truck rental business at Eighth and Girard bears the PSP graffiti told the Inquirer Sony paid him an undisclosed sum to keep the graffiti visible for one month

"It's an interesting little wall mural," he said. "I don't have a problem with it."

At least one local critic sees the ads as a slap at the neighborhoods in which they were placed.

Mary Tracy, a member of the Society Created to Reduce Urban Blight (SCRUB), told the newspaper, "It's not mural art. This is someone trying to sell a product. This is commercialism. You have a multi-conglomerate operation coming into the city and breaking our laws. They're not putting this on walls in [wealthy neighborhoods like] Gladwyne or Ardmore. These are poor neighborhoods. The whole notion that 'if it's urban, it's OK' is very arrogant and very disrespectful."

Former Philadelphia managing director Phil Goldsmith believes the PSP campaign condones graffiti, an issue which the city has fought by successfully promoting wall murals.

"Sony," Goldsmith said, "should forget the advertising and donate its money to the Mural Arts Program."

GP: In the interest of full disclosure, GP points outs that he has been the video game columnist for the Philadelphia Inquirer for the last eight years.




(39 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]calviin
2005-12-28 04:13 pm UTC (link)
I agree that the graffiti is disrespectful

(Reply to this)

I think...
[info]ace_ofspade
2005-12-28 04:17 pm UTC (link)
I think it's disrespectful too, but I also hate Sony's attempts at being "hip" and "urban".

(Reply to this)


[info]chenry
2005-12-28 04:19 pm UTC (link)
the only thing stupider than the graffiti ads is the TV ads that go with it. The Squirrels speaking in sterotypical "black", or the fuzzy-lint...thingies speaking like stereotypical Espanic-americans? Look, i'm one of the least PC people i know, and even i find them to be in bad taste.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

God...
[info]ace_ofspade
2005-12-29 12:54 am UTC (link)
God, don't remind me. They're lol funny, but for the wrong reason

"I'M PLAY'N NUT! I FORGOT ABOUT MY MAIN DEMOGRAPHIC!"

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]kharne83
2005-12-29 10:36 pm UTC (link)
I don't get the ads at all. An ad is supposed to convince people to buy the product, right? Well I don't see how being told the PSP is "carpet you can watch" (or whatever the slogan was) is supposed to encourage me to go out and buy one.

Unless of cource, 'carpet' is some special slang word my "street impared" mind can't grasp. In which case, Sony is just being stupid. In any case, didn't gaming move past overplayed slang and imitation hip-hop after Toejam & Earl on the genesis?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]mechanos_angel
2005-12-31 02:11 am UTC (link)
I can think of one interpretation that MIGHT fit in there, but something tells me it's not something you would want the kids watching *cough*

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]kapper
2005-12-28 04:20 pm UTC (link)
i don't really have a problem with this, though i would have even less of a problem with it if they had gone through the official channels and made a donation to the mural Art program as well. personally, i think people just like to bitch about somethingand right now these ads are aneasy target in philly.they got over the new amtrak building, the septa strike is over, now we're down to psp ads and he casino thing, and i guess they're ok with the casino thing for now.

(Reply to this)


[info]clearmind
2005-12-28 04:25 pm UTC (link)
I'm surprised they didn't do this via a third-party PR firm. If you're going to do this, you heir a PR firm where they throw money at them for promoting the product. That way when an ad campaign gets caught in the law, it's the third-party firm that gets the blunt end of the beating as Sony pulls "Oh, we didn't know. We hired the 3rd party and they did what they did."

That aside, I still think the whole stunt was simply lame attempt to attract a market they clearly didn't think through.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]inabottle
2005-12-28 04:40 pm UTC (link)
"That aside, I still think the whole stunt was simply lame attempt to attract a market they clearly didn't think through."

Didn't think through is right. Which one of these poor kids has the cash to fork over for a PSP, games for it, and UMD movies? Sony, these guys aren't your market. You should be targetting yuppies who consider themselves too mature for a DS. You also need to accept that you're currently a distant second in this market, because whenever you make moves that show us that you think you're the king of the hill, it shows us how clueless you are about where you stand.

Where you stand is, your game lineup sucks, your UMD push is a completely transparent strategy to own the common video format, and I haven't met anyone who owns a PSP that didn't buy your system so they could play old nintendo games on it. Losing to nintendo on lineup strength is pretty hard to do and yet you're managing it. The games you do publish are awful ports because you refuse to work with small companies and the large companies you work with consider the PSP an enormous market risk because the multitude of awful ports chases people away. Meanwhile, your UMD gambit is almost certain to succeed just because, you know, YOU'RE SONY, and you're somehow managing to botch the PSP's market strength so badly that you've pretty much nearly screwed THAT up. The novelty of a universal media format that can be used portible dies when no one wants to own the portible device necessary to play the movies.

And yet you continue to market the PSP like people just need a little push and a nudge to run out and spend every dime they have on one. You need to re-evaluate your position in the market and your plan for improving it. Soon.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]morlock
2005-12-28 06:19 pm UTC (link)
*standing ovation*

TELL IT. YEAH!

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Well...
[info]apathyislife
2005-12-28 08:19 pm UTC (link)
As far as I've heard on reports, it seems as though the mass appeal is more for the UMD factor... which is something that I'll never quite understand. Regardless, we live in the age of gadgets, and it seems like the gadget that does the most is the most coveted. I mean... look at all the rediculous things cell phones are doing, or the popularity of portable dvd players.

I agree with you on a lot of points, such as sony is going after the wrong demographics, and that Sony has not done enough to make the psp an effective videogame platform.

I'm just saying that the features of the psp seems to be the main appeal... as frankly, I have yet to run into a 'gamer' who has one. Mostly just people who're into their widgets. And this in it's self may be the direction sony is going to go.

gives you a lot of insight as to what the ps3 is going to be like.

As for the graffitti, I hate this kind of advertising. I wish the whole "urban" fad would just go away, cause it's just a phantom.

But I wouldn't necissarily say that doing this was a bad idea, as the controversy is basically just more free advertising for sony.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Well...
[info]viridiscervus
2005-12-28 09:09 pm UTC (link)
I think the opposite. I want a gadget to do something, and do it well.

The more is can do, the lower the quality each of those things is, because of the time spent on them.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Well...
[info]apathyislife
2005-12-28 09:21 pm UTC (link)
And I'm the same way. But... most people are not. I mean, look at the popularity of camera phones, console dvd playback features, and peripherals with internet access.

*shrugs* consumerism sucks!

(Reply to this) (Parent)

The 3DO effect
[info]kharne83
2005-12-29 10:26 pm UTC (link)
Ah yeah, I find the new systems weird because of that.

Some here might remember an obscure little system called the 3DO? It was a system that could do just about anything possible with a CD based format: Games, movies, music, photos, you name it. It tried to be everything for everyone, so of cource no one wanted it.

That being said, I find it very odd when a company is happily babbling about how their *game* system can play movies, music, and do about 20-some-odd other *non-gaming* things...

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2006-01-06 12:00 am UTC (link)
The one thing I've kind of noticed around in Rochester is that PSPs are kind of a status symbol. I understand what you're saying about the demographic they are playing to not having the money to buy a PSP, but actually that idea is flawed. It's a different sort of economy. Think of young urban professionals in Europe for instance: property values are not a huge thing in urban Europe and so income goes to clothing, cars, and just generally entertaining. The same, to a lesser extent, can be said about poor "minority" areas of cities. Due to job decline and, unfortunately, racism, property values are a bad bet for young people. Kids and young adults alike end up using most of their income on clothing, cars, jewelry, and things like the PSP. This started back with the Playstation. Playstation opened the door for casual gamers, social gamers, and people who would just generally never play games. These new PSP ads are really just tuned for the tried and true demographic of urban males 18-27. Unfortunately they are also incredibly racist and stupid. I mean consider the "carpet watching" one. If you look at the eyes of these "dustballs" they're all spirally, which I'm assuming is insinuating that they are stoned. So they're basically saying that hispanic guys who play video games smoke weed. And the rest aren't much better. So...all I have to say is WTF.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]calviin
2005-12-28 07:42 pm UTC (link)
Hiring a third party which could then take the blame for as mistake. I think they know that trick. Remember First4Internet? About a month ago with the DRM issue? They tried blaming F4I for that and it still didn't work.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2005-12-28 04:35 pm UTC (link)
The disrespect comes from the fact that they’re encouraging graffiti. I fully agree with Goldsmith there.

Beyond that... hell, cities are where young people are more prone to living. So neighborhoods like that are EXACTLY where you want to put those ads. It has nothing to do with targeting the poor, and more to do with targeting those who are likely to buy your product.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]the1jeffy
2005-12-28 04:59 pm UTC (link)
"The disrespect comes from the fact that they’re encouraging graffiti."

No, they failed to follow the proper channels in their ad campaign. If they had paid for a Billboard License, no one would even care (except maybe SCRUB). The graffiti issue is a side note at best.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Corporate thinking at it's best...
[info]jesdk
2005-12-28 04:57 pm UTC (link)
Gotta love how they screw themselves over by not only trying to use graffiti, but racial stereotypism as selling-power.

Besides, the PSP is a joke - so it can play UMD's, wow.
But does anyone honestly want to watch expensive movies on such a TINY screen?! :|

Didn't think so.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Corporate thinking at it's best...
[info]pixelante_ninja
2005-12-28 04:58 pm UTC (link)
yeah, I think they should focus more on actually getting games on the system instead of movies

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Corporate thinking at it's best...
[info]nightwng2000
2005-12-28 05:38 pm UTC (link)
With the PSP, you could play a game or watch a movie. Initially, that sounds great. But then you find out that you either have to buy your favorite movie again (if you already have it on DVD) in UMD or buy a portable DVD player. Having a small portable game system that can play DVDs also would be a useful tool to have in certain circumstances. It's useful, for example, if I had to work one weekend and have to take my son. A portable combo system would give him lots to do while I work. But having to lug around both the PSP AND a portable DVD player is a bit much.
I don't know if it's a technology issue that they couldn't turn the PS2 into a tiny portable version (even if the screen were a flip down like portable DVD players) or what.

nightwng2000

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Corporate thinking at it's best...
[info]imahori
2005-12-28 09:04 pm UTC (link)
I don't think there's any problems converting a DVD into a format you could watch from the memory stick. You don't need to buy UMD movies to watch movies on the PSP, so I think complaining about that is weird.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Corporate thinking at it's best...
[info]nightwng2000
2005-12-29 12:16 am UTC (link)
I don't know enough about the PSP, obviously. However, in regards to the memory stick, the ones I see for sale has 1 GB of memory. And while the video resolution isn't that high on the screen, wouldn't there be a massive reduction in quality to reduce a DVD video to be small enough to fit on the memory stick? I mean, a video prepared for UMD might look decent, but taking a high quality DVD video and compacting it small enough in memory size to be held on the memory stick would be a major change, wouldn't it?

Plus there is the fact that you could only fit one DVD movie on a memory stick (good quality or not). Those memory sticks are, what, $90? You'd have to make time to convert 1 DVD movie per stick each time you wanted to have a movie with you. And just having a book filled with a few DVDs would be a lot simpler. Plus, I assume the memory sticks are what save games are saved on. As I say, I'm not too familiar with the PSP. So I'm assuming that you can use the memory stick with a PC since you refer to converting the DVD into a format to be put on a memory stick. So either you have 1 memory stick and have to back up your save games each time you want to put a DVD on the stick. Or you have to have more than one stick (much money).

Having it DVD compatible would be far simpler.

nightwng2000

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Corporate thinking at it's best...
[info]imahori
2005-12-29 10:22 am UTC (link)
To make it DVD compatible they would have more than likely had to made the PSP considerably larger. A movie for the PSP generally seems to compress down to roughly 400MB, so you could put 2 movies on a 1GB stick, and have some room left over for game saves and such, which aren't particularly big. Generally you're able to move stuff back and forth between the memory stick and your PC hard drive as necessary.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]revengeofthezio
2005-12-28 05:31 pm UTC (link)
Indeed the Sony and the owner should be citied for failure to get the required papers and whatnot. But I really don't care about the graffiti ads at all. I mean, does anyone actually buy a PSP and say with a straight face, "I bought it because a bunch of graffiti told me too."?

Now those new PSP commericals involving the squirrels and the lint things, those should go. Just annoying, stupid and tasteless.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]nightwng2000
2005-12-28 05:41 pm UTC (link)
"Now those new PSP commericals involving the squirrels and the lint things, those should go. Just annoying, stupid and tasteless."

I know the Italy division of Sony is probably seperate from the one that did the graffiti marketing scheme. But I kinda have to wonder if somehow one or more of the same marketing people who did the commercial that was released in Rome and withdrawn had anything to do with the graffiti commercials.
Or if it's just the overall Sony marketing divisions have the rejects from "The Apprentice". Or what.

nightwng2000

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]pixelante_ninja
2005-12-28 05:44 pm UTC (link)
wut was the commercial like that was banned in rome

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]markusdragon
2005-12-28 06:03 pm UTC (link)
I believe it was the '10 years of passion' one showing a young man with a crown of thorns formed into the playstation button symbols.

Good ad, bad choice of where to show it.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]nightwng2000
2005-12-28 06:08 pm UTC (link)
http://www.livejournal.com/users/gamepolitics/103677.html

nightwng2000

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]pixelante_ninja
2005-12-28 10:26 pm UTC (link)
oh yeah, I remember that, that was when I got [all] my news from gamespot

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]nightwng2000
2005-12-29 12:19 am UTC (link)
Yeah, I heard about this place while on Gamespot. I still go to gamespot. But only to look up info on games. I'm satisfied with Gamespot in that regard. But I like this place better in the interactive arena for news on games and politics. GP consolidates all the info from a variety of sources when it can. That's better than Gamespot's news.

nightwng2000

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]bitnine
2005-12-28 06:02 pm UTC (link)
Hm. I wonder if Sony really thought that this approach circumvented advertising regulations or if they just disregarded them. I guess niether of those are really wonderful, but I am a bit curious.

(Reply to this)

Let me get this straight...
[info]catch_33
2005-12-28 07:00 pm UTC (link)
The city of Philly is suing a man for allowing Sony to conduct it's viral ad campaign on his property?

Good. Stick it to 'em Philly! :)

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Let me get this straight...
[info]brianj012
2005-12-28 08:25 pm UTC (link)
Not sueing, citing. They wrote him a ticket.

That is even funnier, in my oppinion.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Let me get this straight...
[info]catch_33
2005-12-28 08:30 pm UTC (link)
Oh, my mistake.

Still, good on them.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]antiotter
2005-12-28 07:45 pm UTC (link)
Between this and their rootkit...er, copy-protection scandal, 2005 hasn't been a very good year for them.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]catch_33
2005-12-28 08:35 pm UTC (link)
'06 won't be any better if they decide to pull this crap again with the PS3.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2005-12-28 10:45 pm UTC (link)
I certainly hope Sony gets some payback for this stuff. I mean, not only is it disrespectful but the commercials with the "urban" theme are just plain stupid.

(Reply to this)

-Vader
(Anonymous)
2005-12-29 02:12 am UTC (link)
I agree about commericials... They got old VERY VERY quickly... I think they should just have Game Ad's and not portable console ads... but urban Squirls? No... Especcialy when Sony is a Japanese company... I brag to much on something so simple...

(Reply to this)


(39 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…