Game Politics ([info]gamepolitics) wrote,
@ 2005-11-20 10:49:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Thompson Backlash Continues on Amazon.com as Deadline Nears

7:16 P.M.

Jack Thompson's deadline for "proceeding accordingly" against Amazon.com is - as GP types this - less than nine hours away. As reported yesterday on GamePolitics, the outspoken Miami attorney complained to online retailer Amazon.com that his new book, Out of Harm's Way, was being victimized by negative reviews written by so-called "pixelantes" who had not read his book.

It is true that many of the 52 customer reviews currently available are quite harsh. One said of Thompson's book, "It's slanderous of the video gaming industry, and markets drivel to the common man..." Another remarked, "This book is shabbily penned, and obviously rushed out of the door. It's a clear grab at money while his fame still remains."

But the anti-Thompson backlash taking place at Amazon isn't confined to reader reviews. Long before the book was released, mischief makers were apparently engaged in a campaign of repeatedly clicking back and forth between the Amazon listing for Thompson's book and those for a variety of sex manuals. Consequently, readers clicking on a GamePolitics affiliate ad for Thompson's book would find additional recommendations from Amazon that included, "Advanced Sex: 101 Positions and Techniques for the Sexually Adventurous" and "Trust, the Hand Book: A Guide to the Sensual and Spiritual Art of Handballing."

Now that Thompson's book has been released, its Amazon page appears to be under full-scale assault from gamers who have been outraged by the strident anti-game violence campaign waged by the activist attorney over the years. New Amazon features that allows users to add "tags" and even pictures to a product page have been exploited by the anti-Thompson crowd. Of the 30 tags currently posted, the kindest include Scaremonger, and Unscientific.

Customer images - an Amazon enhancement designed to show products in use by consumers - have also been employed by Thompson-bashers to make their point. One user-submitted pic is a satirical cartoon, apparently from web comic ctrl-alt-del. A second pic shows a young woman vomiting. Both would appear to violate Amazon's rules for customer images, which, among other considerations, rule out pictures that are spiteful, or do not relate to the product.

It's not the first time that a controversial conservative has been gamed by Amazon users. In 2002, T.V. preacher Pat Robertson's book "Six Steps to Spiritual Revival" was linked to "The Ultimate Guide to Anal Sex for Men." The same title showed up in Thompson's links in October.

GamePolitics has sought comment from Thompson on the issue, but so far he has been unavailable. GP does have some comments the attorney cc'd us last month in reference to a query by another publication:

"It's pretty simple... You've got your standard gamer morons who are going to gamepolitics.com and other enthusiast sites who are seeing the link to my book on the right side... These too-clever-by-half morons then go to amazon.com, click on my book and then do some more clicking to pull up deviant or pornographic sex books in order that you will see precisely what you are seeing. Before gamepolitics started running the ad for my book, the potential buyers were also looking at Senator Zell Miller's book on the culture war (he's on my side), and other value-and faith-based books... The gamers, once again, are proving my point that they know the price of everything and the value of nothing."

UPDATE / 2:00 PM EST: Jack has posted a long commentary on the Amazon situation....which now (3:30 PM EST) seems to have been deleted. It's all very strange.

YET ANOTHER UPDATE / 9:25 PM EST: Should you be looking for the mysteriously missing Thompson review, GP has a copy stashed here. Also, 7:16 PM EST has come and gone. Perhaps Amazon meant PST?




Page 1 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>

(Post a new comment)

Oh boo hoo.
[info]aresef
2005-11-20 04:06 pm UTC (link)
Reviews:"It's slanderous of the video gaming industry, and markets drivel to the common man..." Another remarked, "This book is shabbily penned, and obviously rushed out of the door. It's a clear grab at money while his fame still remains."

Jack:"WHAAAA THEY HURT ME MOMMY!"

Jack, your book sucks. Get over it.

(Reply to this)

Throwing rocks at a hornets nest
(Anonymous)
2005-11-20 04:08 pm UTC (link)
Does any of the behavior at Amazon surprise anybody? Jack has spent plenty of time attacking and demonizing people, spewing racism and hatred, trying to line his own pockets off the misery of others, and gleefully doing the happy dance when another shooting occurs so the statistics can get padded. All this time he's been ticking off a demographic that includes about 70 million people. Jack has been throwing rocks at a hornets nest, and now he's getting stung and wondering why.

I'm not condoning the actions being taken on Amazon. People who haven't read the book shouldn't be posting reviews at all (whether positive or negative).

I do find the antics funny, though.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Throwing rocks at a hornets nest
[info]winter_b0rn
2005-11-20 05:08 pm UTC (link)
People who haven't read the book shouldn't be posting reviews at all (whether positive or negative).

YES, thank you. I thought that was the whole point of making reviews--you've heard/read/viewed the material in question.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Throwing rocks at a hornets nest - [info]cowboybeboper42, 2005-11-20 05:52 pm UTC
I don't know what to say....
(Anonymous)
2005-11-20 04:09 pm UTC (link)
Even though it does seem unfair, what does he expect amazon to do? Delete every unfavorible comment?

Plus, I have a hard time feeling sympathy for him.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: I don't know what to say....
[info]winter_b0rn
2005-11-20 05:07 pm UTC (link)
At most, he can expect Amazon.com employees to delete content that violates various rule they have for posting reviews and picture images in correlation to the reviews. Given the large inventory they have, he can't expect it to happen overnight.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: I don't know what to say.... - [info]amisplacedphile, 2005-11-20 06:27 pm UTC
Re: I don't know what to say.... - (Anonymous), 2005-11-20 05:57 pm UTC
Re: I don't know what to say.... - [info]incendis_mind, 2005-11-21 05:21 am UTC
Re: I don't know what to say.... - [info]cecil475, 2005-11-21 06:41 pm UTC

[info]chenry
2005-11-20 04:14 pm UTC (link)
at the risk of sounding silly, i don't understand what JT is saying.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


(Anonymous)
2005-11-20 04:18 pm UTC (link)
"The gamers, once again, are proving my point that they know the price of everything and the value of nothing."

First of all, Jack Thompson didn't come up with this so-called point.
Second, WTF does this "point" have to do with anything?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]zeonchar, 2005-11-20 06:11 pm UTC
Ooo, deep - (Anonymous), 2005-11-21 11:38 pm UTC
Ooo, deep - (Anonymous), 2005-11-21 11:41 pm UTC
He brought this on himself
[info]yukimurasanada
2005-11-20 04:21 pm UTC (link)
Jack may not like it, but now he's learning what happens when you piss of technically savy people. The reviewers and Tagers at amazon have wisely used the websites own systems to strike back at thompson for his racist, hatful actions of the past year. Now, he finds himself under attack where it hurts the most, his pocketbook, and he can't take the heat.

Jack may not like it, but he's soley responsible for his current predicament, and though he may argue otherwise, his book is a biography, so anything in it relates to him, and thusly, anything he has said or done, relates back to the book, sense much of what is in the book is self serving drivel. I've read it, and I can say with certainy, it is a wholy fictional tale, both in word and deed, of a man who would like the world to ignore his actions and take what he says at face value.

Sadly, it is not going to happen. Mr. Thompson has brought this headache on himself, and regardless of what happens today, it will make no differance. If the reviews are removed, more will replace them. Gamers are normally a pretty mellow bunch, at least the ones I have meet in my life. But when angered, Gamers will do what they can to seek vengance. In this case, it's using the system that we know best, technology and the internet, to screw thompson.

Sorry jack, but this is your own fault.

Next time, act like an adult, and we'll treat you like one.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: He brought this on himself
(Anonymous)
2005-11-20 04:27 pm UTC (link)
I could not agree more.

After all were pixelantes what do we know? How to breathe and play games is all Jack thinks we know but he could not be more wrong.

As yuki said

"Next time, act like an adult, and we'll treat you like one."

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: He brought this on himself - [info]dividebydesu, 2005-11-20 07:37 pm UTC
Re: He brought this on himself - [info]cecil475, 2005-11-21 06:54 pm UTC
Re: He brought this on himself - [info]uglyface2, 2005-11-20 10:45 pm UTC
Re: He brought this on himself - [info]yukimurasanada, 2005-11-21 01:38 am UTC
Re: He brought this on himself - [info]uglyface2, 2005-11-22 08:40 pm UTC
What I don't get is...
[info]startropics
2005-11-20 04:23 pm UTC (link)
If he's allowed to slander us and the industry with sixth-grade tactics, why can't the offended do the same back to him?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: What I don't get is...
[info]ninja_setsuna
2005-11-20 06:06 pm UTC (link)
When you gather enough courage to hit a bully back the first thing they do is cry and whine to the teacher. The same thing that they beat you up for in the first place.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Seriously...
[info]mazinger_z
2005-11-20 04:24 pm UTC (link)
Does he really want us to take real cracks at reviewing his book? Okey-day.

(Reply to this)


[info]zynth
2005-11-20 04:26 pm UTC (link)
lolz

(Reply to this)


[info]winter_b0rn
2005-11-20 04:33 pm UTC (link)
This kind of thing happens, but it's not right. I don't necessarily like Jack Thompson, but some of the things that people are doing (like adding tags that don't apply and adding pictures that violate Amazon site rules) are just downright immature. If you're going to post a negative review of the book, actually cover the contents of the books, people.

(Then again, Jack Thompson is throwing another hissy fit, threatening lawsuits, and alleging political affiliations that might have happened but won't. Hmmm.)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


(Anonymous)
2005-11-20 04:45 pm UTC (link)
I really have to agree with you on that. It's really sad that the only thing us gamers have to do is act mature in order to prove Jack Thompson wrong. But then morons go and give him reason to think he is right by doing things like what is going on at Amazon. I know he is constantly on the attack of gamers and resorts to insulting stereotypes, but gamers just need to let that speak for his character instead of stooping to his level.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

No dening you make a great point winter - [info]yukimurasanada, 2005-11-20 04:51 pm UTC
I dunno.. - [info]heimdal00, 2005-11-20 09:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]winter_b0rn, 2005-11-20 05:03 pm UTC
More bad news for thompson
[info]yukimurasanada
2005-11-20 04:36 pm UTC (link)
With the ranking holding steady at a dismal 139,000 plus, and 75 reviews, almost all negitive, it may be to late for thompson to save any face. The response to his book is ironic.

Thompsons skill with words is something we here at GP rarely get to see, due to all his sixth grade antics, but he manages to string together some amazing verbage in the propoganda flyer, or as he would say, his book. If the content itself was intelligent, factual, and correct, his amazing skill with big words would be impressive, as it stands, it just makes the book seem more like self serving tripe.

Oh well. Guess we'll hear jack come back saying "The Pixalantes are out to ruin me". Ironicly, thats true. Sadly, it's cause he acted like such and asshole that we are out to get even, and the best way to do that? Make sure his book is a complete failure.

Dennis, one last question, any idea where we could check out sales fiqures in actuall stores online? I know that a hard thing since it takes a while to compile, but is there a database that shows how many books are being sold? Thanks for any furher info you can give BTW.

In closing, I'll just say this:

A sword is a simple thing, cold, swift, and powerful in the right hands. Words can be just as cold,swift, and deadly, The differance is, words can be just as deadly to the one using them, as the one reciving them, and a Hurtful word in the past, may one day come back to haunt you in the present.

I think thats whats happened to jack. He unleashed his verbal sword on gamers, now they are striking back and he's utterly unable to cope.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: More bad news for thompson
[info]inabottle
2005-11-20 04:49 pm UTC (link)
I'm not understanding his frustration- was he expecting a lot of surprise foot traffic? "Oh, hey, it suggests that I read this book- Out of Harm's Way- who is this Jack Thompson character? Oh, well, it has good reviews, guess I'll buy it." Anyone even remotely willing to buy his book is involved in this little culture war of his and the vandalism of his book's page isn't going to have any effect on that. Let's look at this a different way: If sales through Amazon are so important to him that he'd be willing to threaten lawsuits to get his page all nice and review-less again (because god knows that if someone gave him a negative review, then that means that they're pixelantes who didn't read his book), then that would make Amazon his most important bookseller- why would he threaten lawsuits on his most important booksellers? Is it just habit, Jack? Compulsion?

I mean, god knows he won't actually sue Amazon. It's one of the wonderful things that makes him an awful, dishonest lawyer, who should have his right to practice law suspended in 50 states. The fact that he is constantly threatening lawsuits that he doesn't intend to follow through on. Just look at penny arcade.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: More bad news for thompson - [info]gamepolitics, 2005-11-20 05:21 pm UTC
Re: More bad news for thompson - [info]hilaryduffgta, 2005-11-21 09:18 am UTC
Dennis, forgot to ask
[info]yukimurasanada
2005-11-20 04:41 pm UTC (link)
Is it ok if I plug GP in my livejournal entries. Not that I think anyone ever reads it, since I'm not the awesome journalist you are, but if they do, I'd like to direct them to you for all the real information about games and politics, is that ok?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Dennis, forgot to ask
[info]gamepolitics
2005-11-20 05:20 pm UTC (link)
Yuki - of course...

Much appreciated!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Dennis, forgot to ask - [info]yukimurasanada, 2005-11-20 05:26 pm UTC
Re: Dennis, forgot to ask - [info]octavia_hemahi, 2005-11-20 09:31 pm UTC
Re: Dennis, forgot to ask - [info]gamepolitics, 2005-11-20 10:17 pm UTC
Re: Dennis, forgot to ask - [info]octavia_hemahi, 2005-11-20 10:24 pm UTC

[info]mandike
2005-11-20 04:51 pm UTC (link)
Ok, its one thing for people to put informed criticism of Thompson's book up. Its quite another for people to put up random "JT Sux" type criticism. I don't like the guy, but the idiots who are posting stuff on Amazon are giving him more ammo. Now he's going to say "Look at what these imature pixalantes did becuase I dared to speak out." I actually read Thompson's book (something I'm pretty sure 3/4 of the people positng on Amazon haven't done) and you know what? Its not that offensive. Jack has like all of three short chapters devoted to video games. The book is mainly about his anti-radio and music campaigns, and the video game part comes across as an add-on.

I'm all for inteligent criticism, but the idiots on Amazon are degrading the whole gamer community with this childish stunt.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Agreed, but see my above comments
[info]yukimurasanada
2005-11-20 05:03 pm UTC (link)
I actually agree, but jack has brought this on himself. Love it or hate it, most people dont read the review, all they do is check the rating and if it's low, don't buy the book.

I hate that these "kids" ((I asume, given what they right, that there under 13)) are posting, as I tried to write and honest, if somewhat harsh criticism of the book and it's author.

Regardless, he can't say this wasn't "Forseeable", he brought this on himself, and now, he's gonna pay for it where it hurts the most, his profits.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Hey hey hey... - [info]bustermanzero, 2005-11-20 06:11 pm UTC
Re: Hey hey hey... - (Anonymous), 2005-11-21 01:03 am UTC

[info]jmae
2005-11-20 04:58 pm UTC (link)
Mmmmm. Handballing.

(Reply to this)


[info]seifd
2005-11-20 05:11 pm UTC (link)
I read the first chapter since it was free online. When (or if) one of the libraries near me get it, I'll pick it up. However, from the one chapter I read, the book seems like meaningless drivel.

Also, I can't say that I know much about Jack's anti-radio and music campaigns, but isn't just as bad, if not worse? After all, it's all free expression.

(Reply to this)

So let me get this straight...
[info]cashcleaner
2005-11-20 05:13 pm UTC (link)
...Mr. Thompson spends quite a deal of time chipping away at the foundations of our hobby, almost generalizing an entire demographic as he does so, and further devolves the debate by spouting some rather offensive accusations and playing only to his rules. He counters childish remarks with further childish remarks and blatantly skews the turth of the matter at hand when commentating on the issues. He does all this and more, writes a book about it, and somehow acts a little......SURPRISED?! ANGRY?! DISAPPOINTED?! that his new book doesn't get any good reviews on Amazon, and that some go so far as to consider his book akin to an adult-oriented sex manual?

Please, MR. Thompson. Surely you saw this coming more than a mile away.

Now don't get me wrong, I think that what some people have done further detracts from our goals and reinforces his opinions of gamers. If we really, and I mean REALLY wanted to put MR. Thompson in his place, we would be fighting back by NOT going to the book site time and time again to see what has changed. We would NOT be typing down some witty remarks in the review section or spreading the link halfway across the internet, thus giving him even more publicity then he already has. Everytime we jump up and do some kneejerk reaction like this, the more exposure he gets and the closer we get to his level of debate. If us gamers are really as superior as we like to think of ourselves, why are so many of us to stupid to fall for it everytime, and do exactly what he wants us to?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: So let me get this straight...
[info]catch_33
2005-11-20 05:18 pm UTC (link)
Please, MR. Thompson. Surely you saw this coming more than a mile away.

Of course he saw it coming. He foresaw all those death threats and angry emails too. It's all part of his "Get 'em angry, then point out their response out as proof" tactic. It's not working though. It's just aggravating him more.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

An old and oddly persuasive tactic to some to this day. . . - [info]masterash, 2005-11-26 07:49 am UTC
Re: So let me get this straight... - [info]seifd, 2005-11-21 01:13 am UTC
Sweet! - [info]jaimas, 2005-11-21 06:06 am UTC
Denial
[info]catch_33
2005-11-20 05:15 pm UTC (link)
It's pretty simple... You've got your standard gamer morons who are going to gamepolitics.com and other enthusiast sites who are seeing the link to my book on the right side... These too-clever-by-half morons then go to amazon.com...The gamers, once again, are proving my point that they know the price of everything and the value of nothing.

Translation: I've really pissed the gamers off, and now they're doing everything they can to annoy the shit out of me. I brought this on myself, but if I admit it, my crusade's over. I may claim to be Christian, but Denial is my true savior.

(Reply to this)


[info]lotharhex
2005-11-20 05:24 pm UTC (link)
I really love the fact he insults GP.com des[pite this site being the fairest in it's judgements of him.

Seriously though, what did he expect after all this? Only gamers care about him when he's not on TV so it's not like the book was going to sell at all.

Still it proves one thing, if Jack Thompson can get a book published, the one I'm writing should have no problems.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]catch_33
2005-11-20 05:32 pm UTC (link)
Only gamers care about him when he's not on TV so it's not like the book was going to sell at all.

Exactly. When he's not on TV, all he ever manages to reach is the enemy. And he tries to reach us too, with all those damn press releases he posts here. He saw this coming. I mean, he calls us "pixelantes" and claims the games we play make us more violent. Well, if he truly believes that, or at least wants to appear to, he shouldn't be surprised by the reaction we've had to his bull shit crusade.

So the questiion is: Is he genuinely surprised by all this? If he is, that means he doesn't truly believe all this "games are the devil" bull shit. If not, then it means he planned this.

My answer is the latter.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]razor5
2005-11-20 05:33 pm UTC (link)
Before gamepolitics started running the ad for my book, the potential buyers were also looking at Senator Zell Miller's book on the culture war (he's on my side)...

Everything comes down to somebody being with or against him, doesn't it? Black and White. Can't expect much different from a Fundie.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

not a fundie
[info]scarlet_thundr
2005-11-21 03:10 am UTC (link)
OK.

Let me just say this, he's not a fundamentalist, he's a fanatic and a person who follows 'the law' only.

don't please, get fundamentalists confused with this guy.

it's unkind to us.

thanks

-ST

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]leyviur
2005-11-20 05:33 pm UTC (link)
Thompson's not a very graceful loser, is he?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Nope
[info]yukimurasanada
2005-11-20 05:38 pm UTC (link)
Never was, never will be. THats just how he is.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Blame The Gamers
[info]dmdyet
2005-11-20 05:39 pm UTC (link)
Seriously, is there any way to prove of the negative reviews ALL of them are gamers? Is it not possible his book IS ACTUALLY BAD?

As much as I wanted to smack Thompson in my review on Amazon, I didn't-much-, I stuck to the facts with what I had read of the book, and I made the review on the book, not on Thompson himself.

I would agree in his position, however, that there are far too many people going in there and slamming his page with negative reviews on HIM, rather than his book. These are the ones that Amazon should remove. Otherwise, Jacky-boy, as they say here in Aus, "Tough Titties".

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Blame The Gamers
[info]gamepolitics
2005-11-20 05:44 pm UTC (link)
is there any way to prove of the negative reviews ALL of them are gamers?

Prove? No.

Could be some Howard Stern fans mixed in there, I guess.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Blame The Gamers - [info]dmdyet, 2005-11-20 05:50 pm UTC
Re: Blame The Gamers - [info]mandike, 2005-11-20 06:16 pm UTC
Re: Blame The Gamers - [info]dmdyet, 2005-11-20 06:19 pm UTC
You hear that???
[info]viewtiful_dyl
2005-11-20 05:40 pm UTC (link)
Sounds like a crying baby. Damn that 'lil baby's throwing one hell of a fit!

(Reply to this)

Inability to take negative criticism
(Anonymous)
2005-11-20 05:43 pm UTC (link)
The sad thing about this is that he will simply dismiss ANY criticism he gets by telling himself that person is a "pixelante" and therefore biased. This applies to his book as well, regardless of how objective the review is, Jack will always attribute the criticism to "some gamer idiot's hate".
So whatever happens, he'll never stop to consider the possibility that he's wrong and a total a-hole.

Add this the rest of his behaviour (delusions of grandeur - taking down giant corporations, *ahem* 'extortion factories' etc, and also delusions of persecution - everyone is out to get him, all of his former allies who have turned on him must have been paid off by the 'industry', conspiracy against him, etc)

This guy won't go away until he's in prison or in a mental institution folks...

Winniemoo.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Inability to take negative criticism
[info]kharne83
2005-11-20 07:29 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, I think he's hit a downward spiral at tihs point. Every "step towards victory" I've seen him take has turned agaisnt him. And at the same time he still babbles on and on about how he's winnig and we're doomed.

I'm hopeing this isn't a contiuneing trend. I could see him few years down the road, utterly destroyed by his crusade, so powerless and far removed from the issue that the media doesn't bother to report on him anymore, and still he'd be here rambling about his imaginary victory in a fight he's no longer a part of. It'd almost be sad if it wasn't his own doing.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

You reap what you sow
[info]carmine
2005-11-20 05:45 pm UTC (link)
Did JT really expected to have hundreds of 5-star reviews saying "book of the year" and "a must read" considering how many people he's pissed off and how unwilling he is in terms of "helping" the game industry?

I think not.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: You reap what you sow
[info]nightwng2000
2005-11-20 05:51 pm UTC (link)
ARRGGGHHH! :)

Somebody types too fast. :)

Ok, so yours was shorter. Still, great minds and all that. :)

In case your confused, see the thread below yours. :)

nightwng2000

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: You reap what you sow - [info]viewtiful_dyl, 2005-11-20 05:52 pm UTC
John Bruce Thompson should practice what he preaches.
[info]nightwng2000
2005-11-20 05:49 pm UTC (link)
Perhaps John Bruce should told in a way he should be able to understand.

Reap what you sow.

That simple. Preach hate, expect to be hated. Preach ignorance, get it back. John Bruce already said he had no intentions of having intelligent debate. Fine. Even though some have tried anyway, he's still getting back what he dishes out also.

John Bruce Thompson is the classical bully. He's not getting his way, so he's throwing a fit. Funny that he's against the release of a game called Bully. But then, maybe he's even more afraid of even more people metaphorically "standing up" to him.

nightwng2000

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: John Bruce Thompson should practice what he preaches.
[info]dmdyet
2005-11-20 05:53 pm UTC (link)
John Bruce Thompson is the classical bully. He's not getting his way, so he's throwing a fit.

Nobody could have said it any better than that. As I said in another post a while ago, "He's all for free speech until the speech is against what he believes".

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Capitalism
[info]heimdal00
2005-11-20 05:51 pm UTC (link)
If Jack doesn't like capitalism he should leave the country. This is how it works. This is why staff at businesses are supposed to treat people nicely, because otherwise the business is going to lose customers and the support of its customers.

If he can disrespect us as he does, we can disrespect his book. As far as I am concerned there is no defense for him. Some people put up some immature reviews, and I don't blame them at all. This doesn't just happen to Jack. It's called reality.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Capitalism
[info]cecil475
2005-11-21 07:09 pm UTC (link)
Like I said, He brought it on himself.

- Cecil

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Page 1 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…