Game Politics ([info]gamepolitics) wrote,
@ 2005-11-18 15:54:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
BREAKING: Jack Thompson Thrown off Alabama Case by Judge

A shocking development took place today in what, for the video game industry, is the trial of the young century.

In Strickland vs. Sony, the families of two police officers and a police dispatcher killed by Grand Theft Auto player Devin Moore are suing Sony, Take-Two, Rockstar, Wal-Mart, GameStop for damages, based on the premise that GTA turned Moore into a triple murderer. The plaintiffs were led by controversial anti-game crusader Jack Thompson.

GP readers may recall that on November 3rd a hearing was held on pre-trial motions in the case before Circuit Court Judge James Moore in Fayette County, Alabama, where the murders occurred.

During that hearing, attorneys for the video game industry argued that Thompson's Pro Hac Vice (visiting) admission to the Alabama Bar should be revoked for a variety of alleged misconduct on Thompson's part. Although the defense claims about Thompson seemed to resonate with the Judge, he did not rule at that time.

Three days later, Thompson, by then back in Florida, surprised the gaming world by announcing that he was withdrawing from the case.

"The other side wants to make me the issue," he told GamePolitics at the time. The important thing is that the clients be served."

It appeared at that point that Thompson's longtime colleague Ray Reiser would take over for him in Strickland. Today, however, in a blistering 18-page decision, Judge Moore excoriated Thompson's professional conduct, and rejected his attempt to withdraw from the case. Instead, the Judge revoked Thompson's Pro Hac Vice admission, essentially removing him from the case. Judge Moore also noted that he was referring the matter to the Disciplinary Commission of the Alabama Bar for "appropriate action."

Judge Moore employed quite stern language in his ruling. His remarks include, "Mr. Thompson's actions before this Court suggest that he is unable to conduct himself in a manner befitting practice in this state."

For his part, Thompson has responded with an angry letter to Alabama's Judicial Inquiry Commission, questioning Judge Moore's ethics. Thompson's letter begins:

"I have had the disturbing experience of appearing before the above jurist in a high-profile wrongful death action, Strickland v. Sony... In my opinion, Judge Moore has violated...the Alabama Canons of Judicial Ethics by his unfortunate, improper, and prejudicial acts in this case, at the expense of three bereaved Alabama families."

UPDATE, Nov. 19th / 8:05 AM: The Tuscaloosa News has coverage in this morning's edition.




Page 1 of 6
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] >>

(423 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]featherspy
2005-11-18 08:55 pm UTC (link)
YAY!

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Very Nice.
[info]bitnine
2005-11-18 08:57 pm UTC (link)
I most certainly concur.

Wasn't he leaving anyways? I wonder... Did he go back on that, or was this something akin to, "You can't quit - you're fired!"?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Very Nice. - [info]featherspy, 2005-11-18 09:03 pm UTC
Re: Very Nice. - [info]bitnine, 2005-11-18 09:08 pm UTC
Re: Very Nice. - [info]acroamatis, 2005-11-18 11:36 pm UTC
Re: Very Nice. - (Anonymous), 2005-11-19 01:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]l33tminion, 2005-11-19 04:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aniki21, 2005-11-21 12:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]l33tminion, 2005-11-19 04:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-11-19 04:26 pm UTC

[info]synabetic
2005-11-18 08:56 pm UTC (link)
Sweet, sweet weetness.

:D

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]synabetic
2005-11-18 08:57 pm UTC (link)
weetness...huh... -sweetness-, rather... doh!

:D

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Wait... what?
[info]tconx
2005-11-18 08:57 pm UTC (link)
Didn't he just drop out a while back?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Wait... what?
[info]imahori
2005-11-18 08:59 pm UTC (link)
He lied maybe? This is why we need details.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Wait... what? - [info]darkmane, 2005-11-18 09:21 pm UTC
The judge wasn't just kicking him off the case... - [info]jabrwock, 2005-11-18 10:12 pm UTC
Re: Wait... what? - [info]xxxoldsaltxxx, 2005-11-18 10:12 pm UTC
Re: Wait... what? - [info]tsknf, 2005-11-18 10:52 pm UTC
Re: Wait... what? - [info]cecil475, 2005-11-19 03:19 am UTC
Re: Wait... what? - [info]aniki21, 2005-11-21 12:23 pm UTC

[info]coffeejedi
2005-11-18 08:57 pm UTC (link)
ahem... may i be the first to say,

w00000000000t!!!!!

(Reply to this)


[info]imahori
2005-11-18 08:57 pm UTC (link)
LOL

(Reply to this)


[info]vesperablaze
2005-11-18 08:59 pm UTC (link)
you are an awful tease. Posting something like this without giving any details.


Fie on you!

(Reply to this)


[info]xd_melchior
2005-11-18 08:59 pm UTC (link)
Freedom: 1, Jack Thompson: 0

(Reply to this)

Where's Da Beef!?
[info]mazinger_z
2005-11-18 09:02 pm UTC (link)
I want to read the judge's reasoning for throwing Thompson off. This guy seems the type to not hold anything back, as was indicated by their 'squaring' off on day-one for this case.

This, if anything, will be a slap in the face to Thompson.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Where's Da Beef!?
[info]radblackrose
2005-11-18 09:03 pm UTC (link)
My thoughts exactly, both on his reputation and the judge's reasoning. Guess we have to wait for the details...

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Where's Da Beef!? - [info]healer1422, 2005-11-18 09:04 pm UTC
Re: Where's Da Beef!? - [info]bitnine, 2005-11-18 09:05 pm UTC
Re: Where's Da Beef!? - [info]gamepolitics, 2005-11-18 10:07 pm UTC
Re: Where's Da Beef!? - [info]nightwng2000, 2005-11-18 11:09 pm UTC
Re: Where's Da Beef!? - [info]nightwng2000, 2005-11-19 12:16 am UTC
Re: Where's Da Beef!? - [info]cecil475, 2005-11-19 03:21 am UTC
You know...
[info]quartermaine
2005-11-18 09:04 pm UTC (link)
You know he's going to blame it on "far left judges" and "murder simulator apologists".

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: You know...
[info]zerochan
2005-11-19 12:57 am UTC (link)
except that Roy Moore is pretty right-of-center. IIRC he was the guy who tried to keep the Ten Commandments in court.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Jack the predictable
[info]apathyislife
2005-11-18 09:05 pm UTC (link)
I can hear him now. Of course the judge is in ESRB's pockets, and this is an affront to all moral christians everywhere, the appocalypse draws neigh, yudda yudda yudda.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Jack the predictable
[info]jabrwock
2005-11-18 10:14 pm UTC (link)
He was already pretty bitchy because Judge Moore wouldn't let him use "games made me do it" defense during the criminal trial.

I seem to recall Jack vowing that this time he had "experts" to prove to the judge it was a valid defense. Guess he won't get the opportunity himself. :)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Jack the predictable - [info]cecil475, 2005-11-19 03:25 am UTC

[info]jindewinter
2005-11-18 09:08 pm UTC (link)
I see the header and jump for joy, go to read....Details to follow O.o? Lol But I thought Jack had already walked out on the case? Or was this another of his "jokes" he so loves to do?

(Reply to this)

*Scratches his head*
[info]catch_33
2005-11-18 09:09 pm UTC (link)
I'm confused. Didn't he leave the case willingly? Or does this mean he can't testify as an "expert" witness?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: *Scratches his head*
[info]catch_33
2005-11-18 09:10 pm UTC (link)
Why do I feel like I just saw the teaser trailer for a really bad-ass movie that cut out about half-way through?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: *Scratches his head* - [info]catch_33, 2005-11-18 09:12 pm UTC
Re: *Scratches his head* - [info]apathyislife, 2005-11-18 09:27 pm UTC
Re: *Scratches his head* - [info]apathyislife, 2005-11-18 09:11 pm UTC
Re: *Scratches his head* - [info]mazinger_z, 2005-11-18 09:14 pm UTC
Re: *Scratches his head* - [info]catch_33, 2005-11-18 09:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]l33tminion, 2005-11-19 04:28 pm UTC

[info]darkmane
2005-11-18 09:10 pm UTC (link)
Thrown off the case? Interesting.

Will there be a complaint filed with the Bar?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]gamepolitics
2005-11-19 02:28 am UTC (link)
Judge Moore referred the matter to the Alabama Bar's disciplinary board...

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]darkmane, 2005-11-19 04:36 am UTC
OWNED
[info]aceofwilds
2005-11-18 09:15 pm UTC (link)
Dear Jack Thompson,

Suck it.

Sincerely,
Aceofwilds

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: OWNED
[info]apathyislife
2005-11-18 09:19 pm UTC (link)
I'm sure Jack's outlook includes a file titled "suck it"

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: OWNED - [info]aceofwilds, 2005-11-18 09:20 pm UTC

[info]brown_wolf
2005-11-18 09:21 pm UTC (link)
Suing video games for the killing of policemen is as retarded as suing gun manufacters for killing people.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


(Anonymous)
2005-11-18 09:31 pm UTC (link)
More retarded, in fact. At least the gun was present at the crime. It's not like Devin Moore Grand-Theft-Auto'ed his victims to death. Video Games were in no way, shape, or form involved in the crime.

--Joe Marino

(Reply to this) (Parent)

I am shocked
[info]markstandridge
2005-11-18 09:22 pm UTC (link)
Bye bye, Litigation Terrorist--go back to your cozy lil' malpractice in Coral Gables.

-MDS

(Reply to this) (Thread)

and also...
[info]markstandridge
2005-11-18 09:41 pm UTC (link)
YOU'RE filing a bar bitch on the JUDGE? "Hello Kettle, this is Pot--you're black."

I can't wait to see Judge Moore's opinion--Jack, your entire career is going to be studied by law school ethics students as a model of what NOT to do. Your sketchy tactics will be the subject of law review and journal articles (and NOT in a good way). Perhaps I'll write one of these (and I won't spend the first 15 pages talking about what a "special" child I was and how mommy and daddy paid my way through school).

I trust Dennis is, at this moment, looking to get a scan of Judge Moore's well-reasoned opinion and Laddy Jack's irrational response.

-MDS

(Reply to this) (Parent)

In the words of Cartman....
[info]maragon
2005-11-18 09:22 pm UTC (link)
HA HA HA HA HAHA....we're better than Jack...
HA HA HA HA HAHA

Screw you guys, I'm going to go play WoW
:D

(Reply to this)

And that's a wrap.
[info]tsuroki
2005-11-18 09:22 pm UTC (link)
*insert witty retort here*

I'm pretty sure that we all saw this coming. One can only chase the ambulance for so long before getting struck down in traffic.

(Reply to this)


[info]viridiscervus
2005-11-18 09:26 pm UTC (link)
Glee!

(Reply to this)

Jack Lied
[info]apathyislife
2005-11-18 09:26 pm UTC (link)
So he didn't actually withdraw.

Looks like Jack lied to us.

Color me surprised :p

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Jack Lied
[info]andrew_eisen
2005-11-18 09:39 pm UTC (link)
Today, however, in a blistering 18-page decision, Judge Moore excoriated Thompson's professional conduct, and rejected his attempt to withdraw from the case. Instead, the Judge revoked Thompson's Pro Hac Vice admission, essentiually removing him from the case.


Andrew Eisen

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Jack Lied - [info]apathyislife, 2005-11-18 09:40 pm UTC
I did withdraw, so Dennis... - (Anonymous), 2005-11-19 11:36 am UTC
Re: I did withdraw, so Dennis... - [info]gamepolitics, 2005-11-19 12:16 pm UTC
Re: I did withdraw, so Dennis... - [info]ruekayarou, 2005-11-19 04:19 pm UTC
Re: I did withdraw, so Dennis... - [info]semperar, 2005-11-19 07:42 pm UTC
Re: I did withdraw, so Dennis... - [info]phantompvp, 2005-11-19 07:46 pm UTC
Re: I did withdraw, so Dennis... - [info]jdmdsp911, 2005-11-19 09:31 pm UTC
Re: I did withdraw, so Dennis... - (Anonymous), 2005-11-21 10:21 pm UTC
Hey Dennis
[info]apathyislife
2005-11-18 09:28 pm UTC (link)
The "Withdrawn" hyperlink is dead.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Hey Dennis
[info]mazinger_z
2005-11-18 09:35 pm UTC (link)
It's not dead, just FUBAR'd.

Mouse over it and pull out the real URL.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Hey Dennis - [info]apathyislife, 2005-11-18 09:38 pm UTC
Re: Hey Dennis - [info]aceofwilds, 2005-11-18 09:36 pm UTC
Re: Hey Dennis - [info]gamepolitics, 2005-11-18 10:06 pm UTC
Re: Hey Dennis - [info]apathyislife, 2005-11-18 10:08 pm UTC
Re: Hey Dennis - [info]jabrwock, 2005-11-18 10:36 pm UTC
We knew it
[info]aceofwilds
2005-11-18 09:29 pm UTC (link)
"Today, however, in a blistering 18-page decision, Judge Moore excoriated Thompson's professional conduct, and rejected his attempt to withdraw from the case. Instead, the Judge revoked Thompson's Pro Hac Vice admission, essentiually removing him from the case."

HAHA!

"Thompson has respnded with a letter to Alabama's Judicial Inquiry Commission, questioning Judge Moore's ethics."

Oh big fecking surprise. DUUUUR, I aren't not an idiot, it must be teh Judge's fault!! DUUUUR.

Goddamn retard.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: We knew it
[info]razor5
2005-11-18 11:32 pm UTC (link)
Hey, my retarded friends would be offended by that! (partly a shot at Jack, partly true)

(Reply to this) (Parent)

*clears throat*
[info]catch_33
2005-11-18 09:29 pm UTC (link)
It appeared that Thompson's longtime friend and colleague Ray Reiser would take over for him in the Strickland case.

Today, however, in a blistering 18-page decision, Judge Moore excoriated Thompson's professional conduct, and rejected his attempt to withdraw from the case. Instead, the Judge revoked Thompson's Pro Hac Vice admission, essentiually removing him from the case.


OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWNAAAAAAAAAAAAGE!!

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: *clears throat*
[info]apathyislife
2005-11-18 09:31 pm UTC (link)
Heh. "YOU CAN'T QUIT! YOU'RE FIRED!!!!"

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(Deleted post)
Re: *clears throat* - [info]apathyislife, 2005-11-18 09:36 pm UTC
Re: *clears throat* - [info]catch_33, 2005-11-18 09:36 pm UTC
Re: *clears throat* - [info]jindewinter, 2005-11-18 09:37 pm UTC
Re: *clears throat* - [info]catch_33, 2005-11-18 09:37 pm UTC
Re: *clears throat* - [info]chenry, 2005-11-18 09:37 pm UTC
Legal Pwnage - (Anonymous), 2005-11-18 09:34 pm UTC

[info]aceofwilds
2005-11-18 09:32 pm UTC (link)
TGI fecking F baby.

Best Friday ever.

(Reply to this)

Questioning Moore's ethics?!?!?!?!?!
[info]quartermaine
2005-11-18 09:32 pm UTC (link)
O...M...G

Thompson is so warped that he feels everyone who's against him simply must be unethical or bad/evil.

(Reply to this)


(423 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Page 1 of 6
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] >>

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…