Game Politics ([info]gamepolitics) wrote,
@ 2005-11-03 07:49:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:devin moore, fayette, gta, jack thompson, strickland

GTA Cop Killer Lawsuit Begins Today - GP's Predictions

GamePolitics has been previewing the Strickland vs. Sony case all week as game-bashing Miami attorney Jack Thompson and lawyers for the video game industry defendants have been preparing to square off in a rural courthouse in Fayette, Alabama. Hundreds of millions of dollars are at stake, as well as perhaps the future direction of video game design, so, yeah, this is a big, big case.

GP won't rehash the background of Strickland. It's all available here on the site if you just scroll back a few days. But we did promise our readers a prediction on the outcome of the case, so here's what GP's crystal ball says will happen when the trial opens today at 1:00 P.M. Alabama time:

First, the defense team's attempt to remove Jack Thompson from the case via their motion to revoke Thompsons's Pro Hac Vice admission to the Alabama Bar will fail.

While the defense attorneys made an interesting case to remove Thompson, much of the evidence they offered is subject to interpretation and opinion. What's more, the right to choose one's own attorney is a powerful thing in the American legal system. GP believes that Judge Moore, an old-school jurist, will be reluctant to deny the plaintiffs their preferred lawyer - especially when those plaintiffs are the grieving families of two murdered police officers and a murdered police dispatcher, public servants of the Fayette community.

So Jack Thompson stays on the case.

That, however, will be Jack's only victory in Alabama. GamePolitics foresees Judge Moore granting a defense motion to dismiss the case based on a lack of merit, effectively ending the proceeding before it gets started.

Why?

While it's true that death row inmate Devin Moore did play Grand Theft Auto III and GTA Vice City, Judge Moore (no relation) is well aware that the youthful cop killer had a horrendous upbringing by a drug-addicted mother and a severely abusive father. Doubtless the judge has seen many similarly damaged children end up in the clutches of the criminal justice system and standing before him for sentencing.

What's more, there is simply no compelling evidence indicating that playing a violent video game can turn someone into a triple murderer. The conservative, no-nonsense Judge Moore does not seem the type of jurist to discard the notion of personal responsibility in favor of a gimmick such as "video games made me do it." Remember, too, that Judge Moore refused to allow any video game testimony at Devin Moore's criminal trial on the murder charges in August.

So, GP predicts game over for "Strickland vs. Sony," unless Jack Thompson has some type of appeal up his sleeve. We should know more by late this afternoon, so stay tuned.

There is one caveat to this prediction, however. Thompson informed us late yesterday morning that the defense team submitted what he described as a "300-page attack on me" to the court. It is not known what the new document entailed and we have been unable to reach Thompson for comment as he is doubtless busy in preparation for today's opening of the case.




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]ryukisargi
2005-11-03 01:34 pm UTC (link)
At least the judge seems to be sane. It's good to have a legal system that actually weeds out the bad cases, instead of relying on the media constantly.

Jack Thompson, in short, you're boned son.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]sqlrob
2005-11-03 02:24 pm UTC (link)
t's good to have a legal system that actually weeds out the bad cases

Are we thinking about the same legal system? The SCO case (not gaming related) hasn't been weeded out yet. In a nutshell, it's still going after a couple of years and SCO effectively hasn't told IBM what they're being sued over.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]wolfstar, 2005-11-03 03:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sqlrob, 2005-11-03 03:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wolfstar, 2005-11-03 03:31 pm UTC
Nice Predictions
(Anonymous)
2005-11-03 01:37 pm UTC (link)
I still hope this does go to trial. If it does, it will surely be defeated on every count. That would set a powerful precident in favor of the video game industry, providing good ammunition for similar cases.

I sincerely hope a truly competant lawyer never takes the offensive side in a case like this, as I personally wouldn't care to make bets on the outcome in a situation like that.

(Reply to this)

Oh man...
[info]keddren
2005-11-03 01:39 pm UTC (link)
Please tell me you can get your hands on the 300-page document. I'm dying to see what it says.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Oh man...
(Anonymous)
2005-11-03 01:44 pm UTC (link)
I think Jack was lying about that so-called 300-page attack on him.

== BearDogg-X ==
Veronica Mars Wednesday nights at 9pm Eastern/8pm Central on UPN

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Oh man... - (Anonymous), 2005-11-03 02:00 pm UTC
Re: Oh man... - [info]keddren, 2005-11-03 02:11 pm UTC
Re: Oh man... - [info]gargos, 2005-11-03 03:00 pm UTC
Re: Oh man... - [info]radixgames, 2005-11-03 03:53 pm UTC
300 page - [info]illspirit, 2005-11-03 02:04 pm UTC
Re: Oh man... - (Anonymous), 2005-11-03 02:05 pm UTC
Re: Oh man... - [info]tsknf, 2005-11-03 02:25 pm UTC
Re: Oh man... - [info]keddren, 2005-11-03 02:56 pm UTC
Re: Oh man... - [info]tsknf, 2005-11-03 03:05 pm UTC
Re: Oh man... - [info]keddren, 2005-11-03 03:07 pm UTC
Re: Oh man... - [info]mandrakegeek, 2005-11-03 03:02 pm UTC
Coming soon to Pay-Per-View...
[info]kungfu_tse
2005-11-03 01:49 pm UTC (link)
It's a WWE extravaganza! Watch John Bruce "The BatJack" Thompson battle it all out in the ring with the Blank Rome gang. Referee in the ring is Circuit Judge James Moore. They'll be punches, kicks, insults, blood, and chairs thrown.

Don't miss your chance to watch one of the greatest matches in World Wresting Entertainment history.

Call your local cable or satellite provider and order it now!

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Coming soon to Pay-Per-View...
(Anonymous)
2005-11-03 02:03 pm UTC (link)
Honestly, I'm waiting for the day that Jacky T gets struck down in court so badly that he does snap when the judge openly berates his lack of ethics. Then he could say 'crusading against video games made me do it'.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Coming soon to Pay-Per-View... - [info]jindewinter, 2005-11-03 02:41 pm UTC
Re: Coming soon to Pay-Per-View... - [info]yukimurasanada, 2005-11-03 04:09 pm UTC
Re: Coming soon to Pay-Per-View... - [info]jindewinter, 2005-11-03 04:20 pm UTC
Re: Coming soon to Pay-Per-View... - [info]amisplacedphile, 2005-11-03 08:49 pm UTC
Dates
(Anonymous)
2005-11-03 02:04 pm UTC (link)
Thanks for the news as always, Dennis, keep us posted as the trial goes on.

By the by, how long is this thing supposed to go on? I mean, if in fact this will make the O.J. Simpson case look like a quilting bee, it could be well into next year before we hear anything XD

- cube

P.S. "Please confirm that you are a human below." This is new.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Dates
[info]gamepolitics
2005-11-03 02:09 pm UTC (link)
Hard to say...

But if I am correct, it will be over by dinner time.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Dates - [info]schizmo, 2005-11-03 02:55 pm UTC
Can't wait to see Jack humiliated in court...
[info]tconx
2005-11-03 02:05 pm UTC (link)
OF course, even if Jack does lose the case, he'll find some way to spin it. He'll call himself a Martyr, whine and moan about Blank Romes funding, and get ready to launch another case somewhere else...

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Can't wait to see Jack humiliated in court...
[info]wolfstar
2005-11-03 02:21 pm UTC (link)
That's quite the valid point.

If this goes to trial and by some chance Jack wins, it'll be a blow from God himself to show these pronographers that they're wrong, and now games will finally be made good and decent.

When (not really if) Jack loses, it's going to be because the judge was bribed by Blank Romes deep pockets and/or blackmail, and if Jack could have got a fair trial from a non-republican judge, things would be different. Trust him on that.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Can't wait to see Jack humiliated in court... - (Anonymous), 2005-11-03 02:34 pm UTC
Re: Can't wait to see Jack humiliated in court... - [info]wolfstar, 2005-11-03 04:25 pm UTC
Re: Can't wait to see Jack humiliated in court... - (Anonymous), 2005-11-03 07:13 pm UTC
Re: Can't wait to see Jack humiliated in court... - [info]jdmdsp911, 2005-11-03 08:21 pm UTC
Re: Can't wait to see Jack humiliated in court... - [info]jdmdsp911, 2005-11-03 09:23 pm UTC
the judge seems good
[info]psych0tix
2005-11-03 02:23 pm UTC (link)
Thompsons case will sink like a rock, but for sheer comedic value I hope it doesn't

(Reply to this)

Shaun?
[info]the1jeffy
2005-11-03 02:36 pm UTC (link)
Agree or Disagree? Your 2 copper would be appreciated, however, I realize you may not be able to answer due to you not being liscensed yet. But anyway, I think this is a valid prediction, but sadly I don't think it will stop JT. I smell an appeal already in the works, I'm sure.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

I dunno...
[info]sir_bissel
2005-11-03 03:13 pm UTC (link)
I'm pretty sure he can answer, he just can't give legal advice

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: I dunno... - [info]shaun_skipper, 2005-11-03 09:02 pm UTC
Re: Shaun? - [info]shaun_skipper, 2005-11-03 09:01 pm UTC
Re: Shaun? - [info]the1jeffy, 2005-11-03 10:01 pm UTC
Re: Shaun? - [info]shaun_skipper, 2005-11-03 10:10 pm UTC
Re: Shaun? - (Anonymous), 2005-11-04 01:34 am UTC
Re: Shaun? - [info]the1jeffy, 2005-11-04 02:59 am UTC

[info]schizmo
2005-11-03 02:53 pm UTC (link)
I'd like to see what the report.attack said. I see no reason why the defense would attack Thompson without just cause, so maybe its just a compilation of all the far-out-of-this-world stuff he's done already, to show the judge hat Jack "can't be trusted not to lie" or some jazz like that.

(Reply to this)

Wowee
[info]betasword
2005-11-03 02:57 pm UTC (link)
I agree with the prediction. Not to mention the fact that, even if it isn't dismissed, it'll still just be publicly putting holes in Thompson's "facts".

Personally, I wouldn't mind if it weren't dismissed. That way, we can see Thompson be shot down, and he can see it, too. It also presents MANY more possibilities for him to make a fool of himself, quite possibly helping a decision to disbar him by the Florida BAR.

Mr. Thompson, if you're reading this, and the case isn't thrown out, then I'd suggest you be VERY careful about how you handle this. Basically, your career is on the line. One false move, and it's game over for you.

Heh, I made a pun.

(Reply to this)


[info]shadowd1
2005-11-03 03:01 pm UTC (link)
personally, i'm hoping the judge orders a psychiatric evaluation for JT before ruling on the motion to revoke JT's Pro Hac Vice admission to the Alabama Bar.

(Reply to this)

More on the predictions
(Anonymous)
2005-11-03 03:11 pm UTC (link)
I'd like to echo the GP prediction that Laddy Jack's case will fail, at least as to the game manufacturers. Alabama is not a comparative negligence state (comparative negligence, in a nutshell, allows you to sue a bunch of folk who (may have) had something to do with a particular tort or wrong, and then apportion out who was at fault. For example, here, Laddy Jack could say that Devin Moore was 25% at fault for pulling the trigger, Rockstar was 50% at fault for making the game, and Sony was 25% at fault for providing the means for playing it). BUT, since Alabama doesn't follow this prinicple, Jack's gotta basically go balls-out against the game manufacturers--pretty tough to do when ol' Dev, a kid with a horrible upbringing who also happened to play video games, pulled the trigger himself.

I don't exactly know what happened with Laddy Jack's "video game/media effects" argument at Devin Moore's civil trial, but my guess is that it might've been tossed out at a Daubert hearing (where the court holds a mini-hearing on a particular piece of science that one side wants to use at trial, to see if it's "good" enough to let a jury hear). The fact that it was tossed at the criminal trial doesn't bode well for Miami's Sinister Soliciter; my guess is that, if this motion to dismiss doesn't go through, the defense will go for a Daubert hearing to discredit the viability of media effects as a proven science, effecting destroying Laddy Jack's entire argument.

I agree that the pro hac vice motion's probably going down--if it's anything like New Mexico (where I'm from), getting pro hac vice status is practically a simple paperwork matter, unless the attorney seeking it might be called as a trial witness, or there's some other substantial reason for blocking his application. If anything, the defense should have (or did, maybe?) relied on not only Laddy Jack's dubious psyche, but also the fact that he's been nothing but proactive in drumming up WAY too much pretrial publicity (tainted jury pools are a bad thing, Jacky-O).

Thus ends my lil' bit o' legal knowledge for today.

-MDS

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: More on the predictions
[info]gamepolitics
2005-11-03 03:31 pm UTC (link)
Much appreciated.

Regarding the criminal trial, Jack was not involved. The defense attorney, by all reports a very competent fella named Jim Standridge, tried to intro a psychologist to talk about the video game effects. Judge Moore nixed it PDQ.

The same psychologist was permitted to discuss post-traumatic stress disorder from Devin's abusive upbringing as a factor in his insanity plea..

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: More on the predictions - (Anonymous), 2005-11-03 04:45 pm UTC
Re: More on the predictions - [info]markstandridge, 2005-11-03 08:26 pm UTC
Daubert. - [info]shaun_skipper, 2005-11-03 09:09 pm UTC

[info]timbo1138
2005-11-03 03:12 pm UTC (link)
Looks like a pretty sound set of predictions to me. I mean, maybe we're biased, being 'video-game zombies' and all, but surely anyone with some common sense can see that there really is no basis at all for this case?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]sir_bissel
2005-11-03 03:14 pm UTC (link)
BbbbbBbbbbbbbRrrrrraaAaiiiiIiinnnnnnnnnsss...

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]timbo1138, 2005-11-03 03:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]spudsey, 2005-11-03 06:05 pm UTC

[info]i_am_stillwater
2005-11-03 03:12 pm UTC (link)
wow.

Never thought the case would be analyzed like this. Thank you!

As an afterthought though, since you are essentially also a journalist by this blog, isn't there some kind of conflict of interest from predicting the victory of one side or another?

We kinda never talked about that in journalism class when I was there. :/

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]wolfstar
2005-11-03 03:15 pm UTC (link)
M'eh.

While Dennis does a good job of not letting personal bias bleed through *too* much, I don't think he's presenting this as a "fair and balanced" website.

He *does* let both sides make their own comments as they feel fit to do, or he posts rebuttals as they come along, but while he's fair - we all know his bias. :)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

No ones perfect - [info]yukimurasanada, 2005-11-03 03:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]i_am_stillwater, 2005-11-03 03:28 pm UTC
True - [info]yukimurasanada, 2005-11-03 03:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gamepolitics, 2005-11-03 03:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]i_am_stillwater, 2005-11-03 04:04 pm UTC
Honestly, so long as we win, I don't care how
[info]yukimurasanada
2005-11-03 03:13 pm UTC (link)
You know, I understand what you all mean, and I think it'd be great to see Jt get torn apart in court, but I just don't care. Lets end this fast so I can go back to actually enjoying my games instead of having visions of masacuring Jt in them. The sooner I stop wanting to paste his face on all of the FEAR baddies, the better.

Lets beat this this thing, win this case, and go have some fun to celebrate. Sound good?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Honestly, so long as we win, I don't care how
[info]tsknf
2005-11-03 03:16 pm UTC (link)
But I do wonder what is in that 300-page thing. It probably contains a load of e-mails from less mature gamers, and maybe something about PA.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Honestly, so long as we win, I don't care how - [info]yukimurasanada, 2005-11-03 03:18 pm UTC
Re: Honestly, so long as we win, I don't care how - [info]tsknf, 2005-11-03 03:22 pm UTC
Re: Dates
[info]wolfstar
2005-11-03 03:21 pm UTC (link)
I'm just one more gamer with an opinion, not a lawyer or anything.

But for what it's worth, your predicition mirrors my own.

I also see Jack staying on the case, and the case getting tossed.

That said, I'd love to see Jack evicted on a personal level, as well as seeing the case dropped for lack of merit.

Problem is, that's because I'd like to believe it would show Jack the manic nature of his recent antics, and help him pull himself together.

Unfortunately, if he did get the boot, he'd just say that the judge was biased, bribed, black-mailed, or otherwise treating him unfairly.

Jack believes himself to be infallable (part of his mania), so anything that doesn't go his way was obviously tampered with.

(Reply to this)

Jack's First Witness
[info]tollwutig
2005-11-03 03:26 pm UTC (link)
The following is part of the court transcripts which were temporally displaced:

Plaintiff(Thompson): Your Honor as my first witness I would like to summon GOD.
Judge: God?
Plaintiff: Yes, you Honor, GOD cause he will plainly tell you these pornographers are sinners.
Judge: Considering this case can't be any more of a circus, if there are no objections from the Defense I will allow it.
Defendant: There are non Your Honor.
Judge: Bailiff call the witness.

Bailiff: The court calls God.
After a few moments the Witness stand is filled:

Judge: Bailiff swear him er her, err it in.
GOD: HE IS FINE.
Judge: Thank you, Bailiff swear him in.
Bailiff: Please raise your right hand. Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you, well you.
GOD: WELL I CAN'T VERY WELL REVEAL THE WHOLE TRUTH, BUT I WILL AS IT PERTAINS TO THIS CASE.
Judge: err, yeah That will do. You may proceed Mr. Thompson.
Plaintiff: Can you please state your full name for the court.
GOD: I HAVE MANY
Plaintiff: Then can you give us the more common ones.
GOD: JEHOVAH, GOD, ALLAH, THE GREAT IAM.
Plaintiff: That will suffice. Now can you please tell me how your testimony would pertain to this case?
GOD: WELL ASIDE FROM THE FACT THAT YOU HAVE BEEN PESTERING ME FOR MONTHS ABOUT IT, AND YEARS TO GIVE YOU A CHANCE? I AM OMNISCIENT, OMNIPRESENT, OMNIPOTENT, ASIDE FROM BEING THE CREATOR OF ALL THINGS.
Plaintiff: So are you saying created video games?
GOD: IN ESSENCE SINCE I CREATED MAN, AND THROUGH HIM THE COMPUTER, GAME CONSOLE AND THE GAMES THEMSELVES.
Plaintiff: Are you saying YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THESE DEATHS then?
GOD: NO THE YOUNG MAN DEVON MOORE IS RESPONSIBLE. YOU SEE WHEN I CREATED MAN I ENDOWED HIM WITH THE GIFT OF FREE WILL. IT IS THE ABILITY TO ACT ON YOUR OWN VOLITION. ITS A VERY UNIQUE GIFT, UNFORTUNATELY THE GIFT ALSO COMES AT A PRICE, PERSONAL RESPONSIBLY. YOU SEE TO HAVE FREEDOM TO ACT ON YOUR OWN YOU MUST TAKE RESPONSIBILITY ON YOUR OWN. NOW I KNOW MR MOORE HAS HAD A ROUGH TIME HIS PARENTS AREN'T STELLAR PERFORMERS WHEN IT COMES TO PARENTING. MR MOORE HOWEVER MADE A CHOICE, YOUR SOCIETY HAD INDUCED ITS PUNISHMENT FOR HIM, I WILL JUDGE HIM WHEN THE TIME COMES.
Plaintiff: But video games are the work of the Devil, they corrupted him!!
GOD: ACTUALLY NO LUCIFER DOESN'T LIKE COMPUTERS ALL THAT MUCH, ALTHOUGH HE DID ADD SOME CODE INTO WINDOWS WHICH CAUSES IT TO INEXPLICABLY CRASH. VIDEO GAMES ARE A HUMAN INVENTION, AND QUITE A GOOD ONE. I MYSELF ENJOY THE SIMS2 WHICH I DO BELIEVE YOU MR THOMPSON CONSIDERS PORNOGRAPHY, EVEN WHEN THEY DIDN'T EVEN DRAW IN THE INTERESTING BITS. AND DO YOU KNOW WHAT KIND OF MIRACLES I HAD TO PERFORM TO GET ONE OF THE FIRST PSPs?
Judge: You SIR play video games?
GOD: YES BUT WOULD PREFER IT NOT TO GET OUT, SOMEONE WOULD MAKE A CULT OF IT.
Judge: Understandably
GOD: AND WHILE THE GRAND THEFT AUTO SERIES ISN'T REALLY MY CUP OF TEA, I DO ENJOY DOOM AND DOOM2. DOOM3 I THINK LUCIFER HAD SOMETHING TO DO WITH TO RUIN ONE OF MY FAVORITE SERIES I ALSO THINK MY RECORD SHOWS YOUR HONOR, I WAS WAY MORE VIOLENT BEFORE VIDEO GAMES. NOW INSTEAD OF RAINING FIRE AND BRIMSTONE I JUST GO AND DESTROY A COUPLE OF TOWNS IN SIM CITY 2000.
Defense: Your honor in light of this new testimony, we put a motion forward to dismiss the case.
Judge: I agree with the motion. Given the testimony of this witness and HIS incredible knowledge, well about everything, case is dismissed. Witness you are of course free to go.
GOD: I ALWAYS WAS, OH AND MR THOMPSON. CAN YOU PLEASE STOP ASSOCIATING MY NAME WITH YOURS. I'D HATE TO HAVE TO WRITE AND OPEN LETTER.


-- Tollwutig
"I reject your reality and substitute my own"

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Jack's First Witness
[info]keddren
2005-11-03 03:43 pm UTC (link)
Thank you for an entertaining read. I giggled the entire way through.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Jack's First Witness - [info]jiggliusceasar, 2005-11-03 03:51 pm UTC
Re: Jack's First Witness - [info]jindewinter, 2005-11-03 04:31 pm UTC
Re: Jack's First Witness - [info]illspirit, 2005-11-03 04:34 pm UTC
Re: Jack's First Witness - [info]xd_melchior, 2005-11-03 05:09 pm UTC
Re: Jack's First Witness - [info]jonojacques, 2005-11-03 05:40 pm UTC
Re: Jack's First Witness - [info]tollwutig, 2005-11-03 05:45 pm UTC
Re: Jack's First Witness - [info]shaun_skipper, 2005-11-03 09:15 pm UTC
This would make a great Boston Legal episode - [info]kungfu_tse, 2005-11-03 06:11 pm UTC
Re: Jack's First Witness - [info]chinagoldfarmer, 2005-11-03 07:42 pm UTC
I Wonder...???
(Anonymous)
2005-11-03 03:46 pm UTC (link)
Since Jack Thompson claims to be a Christian...and claims to have God on his side...and claims that violent games influence violent behavior...well...

If I were to read the Bible...acquire an interest in Roman crucifiction techniques...and then go out and murder people...and not just murder them...but proceed to string them up on a cross...nail the hands and feet...place a crown of thorns on the head...puncture the side of the stomach...and drench the mouth in vinegar...(this is how Jesus was crucified)...and then when arrested...claimed that I read the Bible and had an interest with Jesus and his crucifiction...

...Would Jack Thomspon then see the Bible as an influentional tool that could be used to want to murder...

...Because I know alot of people that read the Bible and haven't reenacted what they read ...and I know alot of people that play violent games that don't reenact what they play...

...and If my house were lit on fire...and my whole family were still inside...and all I did was stand out in the street and sing and dance...would the study of Nero be banned because I took an interest in him...I mean hell!!!...wouldn't the study of him have INFLUENCED me to do what I did?...

...If Jack really believed violent games breed violent behavior...well then he shouldn't just stop at games then...cuz anything in the hands of a mentally unstable person can be an effective influence tool...

...all it comes down to is understanding what is REAL...and what is NOT REAL...and parents should be monitoring what there kids play...cuz I also believe that kids should not be playing violent games until they show a maturity that indicates if they can handle what they experience...

...and on side note...

...I think Jack should open a history book because I don't think he has a clear idea of what Pearl Harbor ACTUALLY was...and to compare a tragic event like that to Japan bringing violent games over on American soil...does he have any respect?...for anyone?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: I Wonder...???
[info]heimdal00
2005-11-03 04:06 pm UTC (link)
I believe if you look in the Bible you'll find that it says, "V|DGAM3Z R0XX0RZ J0". I checked... and even wrote it in there myself where they had forgotten to (which was almost all the time.. those Bible writer guys sure are forgetful).

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: I Wonder...??? - [info]wolfstar, 2005-11-03 04:16 pm UTC
Re: I Wonder...??? - (Anonymous), 2005-11-03 05:07 pm UTC
Re: I Wonder...??? - [info]chinagoldfarmer, 2005-11-03 07:46 pm UTC
Well, on the bright side...
(Anonymous)
2005-11-03 03:49 pm UTC (link)
Perhaps this will be the end of the JT coverage (for a while, at least) after the trial gets tossed out. He's going to have to find a NEW scapegoat if this Devin Moore thing fails through.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Well, on the bright side...
[info]wolfstar
2005-11-03 04:19 pm UTC (link)
As much as we all wish for that to be the case, if this gets thrown out, it'll be because "the judge was tampered with" or he's corrupt, or he was blackmailed.

The sad reality of Jack is that he really seems to believe himself not only RIGHT, but infallable. Therefore, if he DOES fail, it's because he was somehow cheated.

Frankly, Jack is to be pitied.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Well, on the bright side... - [info]catch_33, 2005-11-03 04:24 pm UTC
Re: Well, on the bright side... - [info]wolfstar, 2005-11-03 04:31 pm UTC

[info]skemodan
2005-11-03 04:15 pm UTC (link)
Maybe he'll go back to attacking rap music if this fails.

Maybe his head will explode.

Maybe his heart will eat itself.

Maybe he will do a back flip and his face will look young and revitalized, not crinckled and old as if it had been forced to sit inside his own bowels for the past 20 years.

Maybe he will be revealed as a droid built and designed by rival game developers when he self destructs.

Maybe he'll call Ross Perot to the witness stand.

Maybe he'll return to his office, a broken man, to a letter from the FBA calling him to an official hearing where he will be disbarred.

Maybe someday he will come to his senses and we can all sit around a table with Jack and have a few beers and remember the times we shared together and how his facets brought the gaming community together moreso than any other point in its history.

Maybe I'll shut up.

Who knows?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]awel_cruiz
2005-11-03 04:21 pm UTC (link)
Maybe his head will explode.

Doubt it. As I've stated elsewhere, I don't think any force is strong enough to penetrate THAT hair.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]catch_33, 2005-11-03 04:29 pm UTC
Drinking with JT? - [info]the_new_l, 2005-11-03 05:02 pm UTC
Dennis, he submitted it to the court?
[info]mazinger_z
2005-11-03 04:28 pm UTC (link)
He submitted this 300 page document to the court? That being the case, is it possible for us to (obviously not the whole thing, unless you're a sick man with a lotta bandwidth) get some kind of summary of it?

I'm curious as to what constitutes an attack on him that requires 300 pages.

Did someone drop a phone book on the rude bastard?

(Reply to this)

Of greater concern...
[info]skemodan
2005-11-03 04:33 pm UTC (link)
Did it really take 300 pages to attack him. We seem to be able to do it in a sentence.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Of greater concern...
[info]chenry
2005-11-03 04:49 pm UTC (link)
yeah, but theirs is a 300-page attack of legal and concise arguments. we just call him a crazy old fart with too much time and money.

rest assured, if they really did put in a 300-page "attack", it was all written cleanly and legally with lots of terms and justifications. And you can bet they didn't call him any names or call someone a zombie.

or make fun of Japan.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Addendum
[info]skemodan
2005-11-03 04:40 pm UTC (link)
I did a bit of searching. Google, CourtTV, Reuters, Yahoo News, AP, NYTimes, and you want to know what I found?

No one cares, or even knows this case is going on. So much for Jack's proposal that this case will make OJ Simpson look like quilting bees. Hell, the CourtTV website still has links to the Simpson trial transcripts on its front page, but under "Todays's Trials" there is NOTHING on Stricklnad vs. Sony, Jack Thompson, Devin Moore, Alabama...NOTHING! This case is being shadowed by a woman who stoned her kids to death, a lawsuit against Vioxx, and some other cop-killer case that has nothing to do with videro games.

Guess that press release wasn't well publicized. Good job JackASS.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Addendum
[info]catch_33
2005-11-03 04:57 pm UTC (link)
I wish this case was as publicized as JT wanted it to be. I want everyone know how much of a failure he is.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Addendum - [info]wolfstar, 2005-11-03 04:59 pm UTC
Re: Addendum - [info]keddren, 2005-11-03 06:26 pm UTC
Re: Addendum - [info]gamepolitics, 2005-11-03 08:38 pm UTC

[info]joshdavis271
2005-11-03 04:57 pm UTC (link)
so, it begins.

I like to also predict jack's loss, games cannot train anyone to do anything, how many times do we have to repeat this.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]joshdavis271
2005-11-03 05:18 pm UTC (link)
man I am nervous now, what if by a small chance this loony wins, the gaming industry would have to yield to the higher powers.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Rating system
(Anonymous)
2005-11-03 05:17 pm UTC (link)
I'm all for making video games follow the same rating systems and laws they do for movies. However, Video games don't make people violent or killers. That is caused by his environment, aka his parents/family/friends/etc... People need to 1) start taking responsibility for their own actions and 2) start being parents and become involved in there kids lives.

(Reply to this)


Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…