Game Politics ([info]gamepolitics) wrote,
@ 2005-10-15 08:04:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Grand Theft Auto Mod Community Unveils Jack Thompson Parody

Those cheeky GTA modders are at it again.

The fan-based mod community which unleashed Hot Coffee upon the world continues to tweak their favorite video game series. Their latest effort lampoons a rather well-known figure in gaming circles. Defamation of Character: A Jack Thompson Murder Simulator places a likeness of the controversial anti-game crusader into typical Grand Theft Auto action sequences.

As described by the mod team, which calls itself "The Fighting Hellfish," the mod "allows players to adopt the role of prominent anti-videogame attorney Jack Thompson as he lives through an insane weekend which changes his life... It turns out that all the time Jack spent studying violent video games has turned him into a Manchurian Candidate. Receiving calls at random that begin with the classic line, 'Why don't you pass the time by playing a little solitaire?' Jack immediately falls under a hypnotic spell, transforming into his criminal vigilante alterego Banman to commit violent acts in the name of Thompson's morality. While Thompson enjoys legal immunity as an attorney, Banman has both regenerating armor and bullet time to help him make his way."

The modders have obviously been paying close attention to gaming's current political and cultural landscape. In the DOC mod, for example, the Banman character undertakes a mission to destroy 18-wheelers before they can deliver Rockstar's Bully to retail stores. Meanwhile, the Jack character gathers news for a press conference by traveling to GTA locale San Fierro in order to catch ESA boss Doug Lowenstein and a hacker exchanging a disk full of naughty Sims character images.

According to an e-mail received from Hellfish, players can choose the Jack character's comments at the subsequent press conference, with 85% of his dialogue coming from real-life Thompson quotes. Before the mod ends, the Jack character will have the chance to take on both Lowenstein and former attorney general Janet Reno, both longtime targets of the real attorney's ire.

The Fighting Hellfish added, "We decided early on in doing this mod that we wanted it to be fun on its own, even if the player doesn't know who Thompson is, much less Reno or Lowenstein. That said, we also wanted to use it as political satire, and firmly convinced that Jack is already his own best parody, we simply went about adopting bits from these diatribes... "

"As Jack Thompson recently outlined his proposal for a violent video game, we have decided... to develop a version of Thompson's game for San Andreas, sticking as closely to his proposal as possible save one major change: instead of playing as O.K., players will resume the role of Jack Thompson..."

The mod is native to the PC version of GTA: San Andreas. However, Hellfish tells GP, "With a bit of technical know-how, it's possible to ftp DoC to a xbox and play that way." Videos and screen shots of action sequences from the mod can be found here.

Reached for comment, Jack Thompson e-mailed GP, "I'm not interested and won't be commenting on the mod. The satirical piece entitled 'A Modest Video Game Proposal' was intended to highlight the patent hypocrisy and recklessness exhibited by the video game industry's willingness to target cops, women, homosexuals, and other groups with some of their violent games. To be fair, though, you can't expect a bunch of gamers to understand the satire if they think that Jonathon Swift, the author of 'A Modest Proposal,' is the name of a new Nike running shoe...

...I will say this though, the 'video game community' (what's next, 'the necromancy community'?) surely seems exercised about someone who is a 'joke' and who is accomplishing nothing. You all seem rather bothered and worried about a nonentity. God is in this battle, and I am privileged to be a foot soldier. You all should be concerned, not about me, but about Him.
"




Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>

(176 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Lol ha Ha Ha
[info]hilaryduffgta
2005-10-15 01:15 pm UTC (link)
..I will say this though, the 'video game community' (what's next, 'the necromancy community'?) surely seems exercised about someone who is a 'joke' and who is accomplishing nothing. You all seem rather bothered and worried about a nonentity. God is in this battle, and I am privileged to be a foot soldier. You all should be concerned, not about me, but about Him."


See jack you cant help but insult people every single chance u get..Great Article there Dennis..You didnt happen to get that from the link i put in one of the articles the other day did ya..if ya did no biggie bro i was just wondering..sure jack you wont comment on it..and as soon as people start posting in here and commenting on it and laughing away you will be right here insulting and making threats...Thats why david walsh finally saw you for what you are..a Slimeball...BanMan! BanMan! BanMan! nanananananananana BanMan!

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Lol ha Ha Ha
(Anonymous)
2005-10-18 10:24 pm UTC (link)
Bastard.

The Necromancy community is doing just fine, thank you.

- Babaszygy, 46 Necro on EQ2's Najena

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]joshdavis271
2005-10-15 01:20 pm UTC (link)
Oh quit with the religious stuff, god is on no one's side in this, the god I know, does not side with hypocrytical lawyers who likes to stereotype gamers has murderers and brain damaged, the god I know does not cast aside someone or
sends people to hell just because we are gamers. God is all about forgiveness not vengence.

You need to know, that if you kill someone in a video game, it does not violate the thou shall not kill rule. If you do it in real life however then the rule is broken.

Give up jack, you are fighting a lost cause.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Actually...
(Anonymous)
2005-10-17 08:29 pm UTC (link)
God's pretty much down with the gaming community. I mean, I play CTF with Him just about every weekend. He can be a little bit of a rocket bitch sometimes, but He's pretty metal.

Andrew A. Gill

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Actually... - [info]cielmer, 2005-10-19 11:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]occular, 2005-10-18 12:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]soph, 2005-10-18 11:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]occular, 2005-10-19 09:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]soph, 2005-10-19 10:39 am UTC

[info]i_am_stillwater
2005-10-15 01:20 pm UTC (link)
but Im concerned for Jack's mental health too!

Couldnt they mod indigo prophecy to have Jack thompson play the lead? So he can get depressed and commit suicide? or maybe even have at least a remote chance of having sex with a girl?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]odinmagick
2005-10-19 02:30 am UTC (link)
hot coffee mod

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Uh?
[info]tsknf
2005-10-15 01:23 pm UTC (link)
"Necromancy Community"? What?

Sorry Mr Thompson, but you lawyer types are too much fun to make fun of to stop doing it ;).

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Uh?
[info]cowboybeboper42
2005-10-15 02:28 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, where the hell did Necromancy Community come from?
Methinks Jackie has been playing Guild Wars

(Reply to this) (Parent)

He proves our point time and again
[info]yukimurasanada
2005-10-15 01:29 pm UTC (link)
It's no suprise he isn't commenting. The fact that this was made shows just how much of a Non factor he is. Nothing is more enjoyable to make fun of then someone who has utterly failed, and that is just what jack is. he has failed, but cannot see this.

As far as his religious speil, the god I know doesn't belive in vengance, nor does he view one person above the others. All are his children. My father, prior to enlistment in the military, spent much of his adolence at a semminary, and knows the bible in both english and latin. Jack invokes the name of god for his own selfish aims. What did my dad say that was? Oh, thats right

Using Gods name in VAIN.

The one going to hell jack, is you.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: He proves our point time and again
[info]ninjaink
2005-10-18 09:02 am UTC (link)
I agree. Unless you happen to have some stone tables signed by God saying that, yes, God is behind you on what you do, than hes not. Oh whats the lawyistic term for falsely using someone identity? Oh yeah, Slander! Gee, you would think JT would know better than to use The creator of the flippen universes name without expressed permission!

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Yoo-Hoo, Are you there, Jack?
[info]noreallife2
2005-10-15 01:36 pm UTC (link)
Jack, this is how most people look at you...as a joke. Sorry, dude, but you brought this all on yourself.
I would LOVE to find out what quotes they used in the game. Gonna go check out the screenshots.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Yoo-Hoo, Are you there, Jack?
[info]joshdavis271
2005-10-15 01:54 pm UTC (link)
Whos the Dade State attourney now, B**ch! that one is awsome.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Huh
[info]hilaryduffgta
2005-10-15 02:02 pm UTC (link)
Ok i know its early this morning but i was reading the whole comment and i'll quote it right now "Reached for comment, Jack Thompson e-mailed GP, "I'm not interested and won't be commenting on the mod. The satirical piece entitled 'A Modest Video Game Proposal' was intended to highlight the patent hypocrisy and recklessness exhibited by the video game industry's willingness to target cops, women, homosexuals, and other groups with some of their violent games. To be fair, though, you can't expect a bunch of gamers to understand the satire if they think that Jonathon Swift, the author of 'A Modest Proposal,' is the name of a new Nike running shoe...

...I will say this though, the 'video game community' (what's next, 'the necromancy community'?) surely seems exercised about someone who is a 'joke' and who is accomplishing nothing. You all seem rather bothered and worried about a nonentity. God is in this battle, and I am privileged to be a foot soldier. You all should be concerned, not about me, but about Him"

Now im lost at "this part" video game industry's willingness to target cops, women, homosexuals, and other groups with some of their violent games.


Homosexuals????? *scratches head* Im Confused

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Huh
[info]cowboybeboper42
2005-10-15 02:28 pm UTC (link)
"'A Modest Video Game Proposal' was intended to highlight the patent hypocrisy and recklessness exhibited by the video game industry's willingness to target cops, women, homosexuals..."

Wow, are you defending homosexuals in a way Jack? I mean, considering that you are a hardcore Christian, you'd like to see them burn along with Bully.

Jack, your proposal is utter nonesense, satire at its weakest. Your proposal flies in the face of what you stand for. A child is killed by a gmer and the solution is mass murder of innocent people? Why don't you opt for a point and click adventure game that asks the player to confront the parents and have a sit down.

You, sir, are an idiot. If only I had the PC version of SA. This mod looks hysterical

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Huh - [info]hilaryduffgta, 2005-10-15 02:33 pm UTC
Re: Huh - [info]joshdavis271, 2005-10-15 02:40 pm UTC
Re: Huh - [info]illspirit, 2005-10-15 05:13 pm UTC
Re: Huh - (Anonymous), 2005-10-16 04:01 am UTC
Re: Huh - (Anonymous), 2005-11-01 12:50 pm UTC
Oh the irony!
[info]aresef
2005-10-15 02:04 pm UTC (link)
So Jack, when will you sue Rockstar for the user-made mod? Because obviously it was coded in there the entire time...

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Oh the irony!
[info]joshdavis271
2005-10-15 02:13 pm UTC (link)
He will announce a suit, bet on it, and where is the balme gonna go? ROCKSTAR!!!

This time though I will stick with R* and say it is the modder's fault, so get the mod while it's hot.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]crimson_mage
2005-10-15 02:10 pm UTC (link)
Dear Jack,

You can't even spell Jonathan Swift. You fail.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]japanpeterpan
2005-10-18 02:47 am UTC (link)
Someone finally said it.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]linnen, 2005-10-18 11:52 am UTC

[info]crazyitperson
2005-10-15 02:12 pm UTC (link)
Jack's response is funny as hell to read out loud. I love the bits where:

* 'Modest Video Game Proposal' was a JAB at the video game company, not the horrific backfire that was caused by the exceptionally poor writing, but you gamers are EEEEEDIOTS, so you wouldn't understand anyway!

* Likening 'A Modest Proposal' to the name of a new Nike shoe. That's one hell of a stretch there, Jack.

* He still thinks he's important when the community is laughing and pointing and debunking him

* 'exercised'

* How he likens video games with necromancy (I would say more like 'neuromancy', but that's because I read too much William Gibson and that's a stretch all in itself, anyway)

* How he suddenly seems to have God on his side and how we should be worried

* How we all should be concerned about God's 'forthcoming ass-kicking'.

At least he's not going lawsuit-happy with this one. Yet...?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Lol
[info]hilaryduffgta
2005-10-15 02:19 pm UTC (link)
Give it time....im sure he will

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Lol - [info]joshdavis271, 2005-10-15 02:25 pm UTC
Re: Lol - [info]cowboybeboper42, 2005-10-15 02:32 pm UTC
Re: Lol - [info]joshdavis271, 2005-10-15 02:42 pm UTC

(Deleted post)
Re: Fighting under the name of God...
[info]joshdavis271
2005-10-15 03:17 pm UTC (link)
Probably it is satan in disguise, the god I know does not hate gamers, he loves every one gamer and loony alike.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Fighting under the name of God...
[info]kungfu_tse
2005-10-15 03:17 pm UTC (link)
"God is in this battle, and I am privileged to be a foot soldier. You all should be concerned, not about me, but about Him."

Funny, I remember Osama Bin Laden saying something similar in his war against the U.S. I think David Koresh did too.

Jack, does God actually talk to you? Is there some line in the Holy Book that I missed that declares war on the video game industry?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Fighting under the name of God...
[info]automancer
2005-10-15 03:47 pm UTC (link)
A necromancy community? I...uh...I'm not quite sure where he was going with that one. Are we all going to start seeing dead people?

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Fighting under the name of God... - [info]_jeckel, 2005-10-15 03:49 pm UTC
Re: Fighting under the name of God... - [info]occular, 2005-10-19 09:24 am UTC
Re: Fighting under the name of God... - [info]prawninator, 2005-10-20 12:07 pm UTC
Re: Fighting under the name of God... - [info]occular, 2005-10-20 12:44 pm UTC
Re: Fighting under the name of God... - (Anonymous), 2006-01-10 06:25 am UTC
Re: Fighting under the name of God... - [info]occular, 2006-01-10 10:49 am UTC
Re: Fighting under the name of God... - [info]prawninator, 2005-10-20 12:08 pm UTC
I think I understand him now
(Anonymous)
2005-10-15 03:39 pm UTC (link)
He believes that insults = arguments and that serious discourse means comparing the opponent to a infamous murderer or two while not drawing any meaningful analogy. This would explain his behavior here, and why he believes that a parody would be the result of fear on account of his opponents. He doesn't like actual arguments, which is why he told that one guy who tried to point it out, "people like you are the problem." or somesuch.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: I think I understand him now
[info]kingnat
2005-10-17 11:57 pm UTC (link)
Reading Jack Thompson is like reading an LJ troll... hmmm, time for an open letter of my own methinks :P

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Jack hates charity!
[info]jabrwock
2005-10-15 04:05 pm UTC (link)
He offered $10,000 to a charity if someone would make his game, that sounded like a real offer to me. And now that someone takes him up on the offer, he backs off and claims he was "only joking to make a point"?

I guess when Fighting Hellfish finish the mod, we can officially claim that Jack is refusing to own up to his offer to donate $10,000 to charity. Guess Jack hates charity afterall. What a selfish bitch.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Jack hates charity!
[info]jabrwock
2005-10-15 04:18 pm UTC (link)
Hey Dennis, you mentioned that Jack had sent more emails regarding the NIMF letter, you posting them later? :)

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Jack hates charity! - [info]jerkworthy, 2005-10-15 06:25 pm UTC
Re: Jack hates charity! - [info]jerkworthy, 2005-10-15 06:26 pm UTC
Re: Jack hates charity! - (Anonymous), 2005-10-16 12:38 am UTC
Swift didn't need a disclaimer - [info]jabrwock, 2005-10-17 01:08 am UTC
Re: Jack hates charity! - (Anonymous), 2005-10-17 08:06 pm UTC
Re: Jack hates charity! - [info]jabrwock, 2005-10-16 12:49 am UTC
A couple points
[info]spudsey
2005-10-15 04:28 pm UTC (link)
Here are a couple points I'd like to make on your comments, Jack.

1) I know who Jonathan Swift is, and have read "A Modest Proposal." Multiple times, as a matter of fact. I sorta had to since I'm an English major.

2)I believe it says in the Bible that it's impossible for man to know the ways of God. Therefore, I have one question: Where the hell do you get off saying that you're "God's footsoldier", you pretentious, hypocritical windbag?

Sorry if this seems harsh, but if someone's gonna accuse me of being stupid simply becuase I play games, then I'm gonna have something to say about it.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: A couple points
[info]spudsey
2005-10-15 04:30 pm UTC (link)
In addition:

You, sir, are no Swift. For one thing, his "modest proposal" was actually amusing. Yours is just dumb.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: A couple points - [info]jabrwock, 2005-10-16 01:07 am UTC

[info]kaelle
2005-10-15 05:25 pm UTC (link)
Jack is sullying the name of christians with his silly crusade. The only two gods in politics are the person above you and George Washington.

(Reply to this)

Ad hominem
[info]lowe0 [deadjournal]
2005-10-15 05:28 pm UTC (link)
Below is the text of an email I sent to Mr. Thompson. I'll repost it here, since he appears not to have gotten the message the first time.


Mr. Thompson:

I've been following the controversy that seems to surround some of the posts
on Gamepolitics.com. (Note that the rest of this message assumes that the
posts attributed to you, obvious falsifications excluded, were written by
you - feel free to disregard the remainder of the message if this is not a
valid assumption.)

Several of these posts seem to contain insulting statements against gamers,
calling them "pixelantes" or implying that they lack the mental capacity to
understand your arguments (or in one case, written English). These types of
statements attack gamers themselves, rather than providing any sort of
sound, valid argument against gaming, and stray dangerously close to an ad
hominem fallacy.

Furthermore, not every gamer is unintelligent - while we certainly are not
all John Carmack (I assume you are familiar with Mr. Carmack, though you may
not be aware of his achievements in amateur rocketry, as a front-runner in
the recent X-Prize competition), many intelligent individuals engage in
gaming for entertainment. As an example, I graduated from Purdue University
with a solid GPA, have a career that challenges my intellect and creativity
every single workday, and continue to learn to keep myself on the cutting
edge of my chosen profession. I also enjoy gaming in my spare time, whether
it be catching up with old friends via Xbox Live, a quick match against my
fiancee at one of her favorite games, or just relaxing and enjoying a
single-player game. (I'll spare you the usual line of "and I've never
killed anyone, either!" as one would expect that most people they meet in
civilized society are not killers, regardless of their hobbies.)

In conclusion, we're not all idiots, and treating gamers as such makes any
sort of intelligent and reasonable discourse impossible. I urge you to
reconsider your debating tactics in the future, and to provide sound, valid
arguments for your position instead of insults.

Kevin Lowe



Again, Mr. Thompson, it's incorrect to assume that gamers are unintelligent or uneducated. The use of insults (by either side; I'm not giving all of you a pass here either) is an indicator of an immature debater lacking a solid argument.

Furthermore, isn't it a bit presumptuous to claim that God is on your side, or to compare yourself to the soldiers who defended the freedom of the entire world in Europe? Again, let's see a convincing argument for your position, instead of trying to hitch a free ride on the backs of those heroes.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Ad hominem
[info]beelzebozo
2005-10-15 05:49 pm UTC (link)
I had to say it, but you're pissing in the wind. Jack only hears one thing and that is the sound of his own voice. God himself could come down and tell him otherwise and Jack would accuse him of being Satan in disguise. The only thing that is going to convince him otherwise is a sharp blow to the head and the offending brain cells getting knocked loose.

You can't convince an ideologue, be they Jack Thompson, Osama Bin Ladin, or George W. Bush. The best you can do is counter their attack with logic and keep track of their missteps and mistakes. Not to convince them that they are wrong, but to make sure that other people see what stupidity is being spewed so that the poison doesn't spread.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Ad hominem - [info]cowboybeboper42, 2005-10-15 06:05 pm UTC
Unless you have a tv camera that can broadcast to millions plus a lot of money.....
[info]quartermaine
2005-10-15 06:00 pm UTC (link)
Jack won't talk to you. Further more, how'd you email him? Someone said it was shut down.....

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Unless you have a tv camera that can broadcast to millions plus a lot of money.....
[info]joshdavis271
2005-10-15 06:07 pm UTC (link)
You a gamer, then you are brain dead, if you agree with him, then you are ok, look at what happened with david walsh, Jack now calls him a tool, Jack will or has lost credibility, politicians are more likely to listen to people like walsh then to that loony.

Though we do need to talk to walsh and get him to help us and the game industry educate parents about the rating system.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Unless you have a tv camera that can broadcast to millions plus a lot of money..... - [info]neftaly, 2005-10-18 02:57 am UTC
Re: Unless you have a tv camera that can broadcast to millions plus a lot of money..... - (Anonymous), 2005-10-18 07:48 pm UTC
Re: Unless you have a tv camera that can broadcast to millions plus a lot of money..... - (Anonymous), 2005-10-18 08:30 pm UTC
To Be Expected
[info]sothasil
2005-10-15 06:06 pm UTC (link)
I knew JT had no intention of coughing up any dough. He's an asshole. Assholes don't do anything good for anyone else.

While the nature of JT's proposal was obviously a jab at the industry, he's only now declaring it as such because someone's put his ass in the hot seat instead of an enraged father. That's not what he wanted. He wanted the industry to basically admit that he's on the right track about everything. Instead, some modders exposed him for what he really is: a lunatic who, if he had the balls, would gladly gun down innocent people because, essentially, God told him to.

His proposal was honest at the time he wrote it. I guarantee you of this. He's backtracking because it didn't work. You lose JT. Again.

I also find it funny that he accuses gamers of not knowing who Jonathan Swift is, when several of us have said that JT's "no Jonathan Swift".

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2005-10-15 06:47 pm UTC (link)
1) um im pretty sure there is a necro community.....
2) damn, why did i trade in my xbox for a ps2, just to get SA earlier, now i pretty much peed away my chances of getting this mod, im not in the mood to buy a pc version now
3)GP, you missed a mod where a bike was replaced with a naked women grabbing onto the axils of the wheels
4)the govanator will be on hard-ball(msnbc) wensday hint hint

evirus the slaye

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]gamepolitics
2005-10-15 07:46 pm UTC (link)
Well, um, I miss most GTA mods, but this one was brought to my attention by the Fighting Hellfish team.

The Guv & CHris Matthews... sounds like a Tivo alert. Thx!

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Some Choice Quotes
[info]sothasil
2005-10-15 07:01 pm UTC (link)
The satirical piece entitled 'A Modest Video Game Proposal' was intended to highlight the patent hypocrisy and recklessness exhibited by the video game industry's willingness to target cops, women, homosexuals, and other groups with some of their violent games.

I've never seen a game where you can beat up homosexual people. Ever. You'd think I would have, since such a game would likely provoke more outrage than that JFK assassination simulator.

I will say this though, the 'video game community' (what's next, 'the necromancy community'?)

I'm not sure what he's implying here. Does he think that the gaming community is some group of juvenile delinquents with brain damage, and not a world-wide community of people of all ages and races who have a passion for the entertainment medium known as video games? Certainly looks like it. What an ignorant asshole.

surely seems exercised about someone who is a 'joke' and who is accomplishing nothing. You all seem rather bothered and worried about a nonentity.

Apparently he thinks we mock him as a response to our "delinquent ways" being threatened by him. Not even close old man. We find one of your many flaws and poke fun at it. Why? Because they're numerous, and as the modders have said, you are a parody unto yourself. Th contradictions and ironies in your very nature are so abundant that it's a wonder the universe doesn't collapse in on itself from your existence.

God is in this battle, and I am privileged to be a foot soldier. You all should be concerned, not about me, but about Him.

Why? I don't believe in God. I have no reason to. And he wouldn't be on your side anyway. You take his name in vain and lie every day. Last I checked, that's a couple of sins.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Some Choice Quotes
(Anonymous)
2005-10-15 07:17 pm UTC (link)
as a representative of the Necromancy community i am not amused!

Mr. Thompson, you sir just bought your self a zombie invasion!

now where did i put my Trioxin 2-4-5....

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Some Choice Quotes - [info]joshdavis271, 2005-10-15 07:39 pm UTC
Re: Some Choice Quotes - [info]joshdavis271, 2005-10-15 07:19 pm UTC
Re: Some Choice Quotes - [info]sothasil, 2005-10-15 07:42 pm UTC
Re: Some Choice Quotes - [info]joshdavis271, 2005-10-15 07:45 pm UTC
Re: Some Choice Quotes - [info]mozzarella, 2005-10-19 03:13 am UTC
Re: Some Choice Quotes - [info]another_neko, 2005-10-24 06:08 pm UTC

[info]litagemini
2005-10-15 08:27 pm UTC (link)
Ha ha ha: this brings the lulz. Sounds like a blast.

Since I mentioned it in a previous post, I don't know of any other way to get it to you other than a reply to a post of similar content.

Here's the write-up in my LiveJournal about the Games and Censorship panel at MSU.

If you want additional info, check back at the Futureplay web site and the Thunderbird Six podcast, which I mention in my post. Thunderbird will be eventually hosting a different panel interview, recorded this morning, on the topic of games censorship, with Henry Jenkins and Ernest Adams. I caught (and participated in) just the last part of this interview.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]gamepolitics
2005-10-15 08:49 pm UTC (link)
wow, that's great stuff.

Too long to make into a standard post, but I will find a way to present it tonight... too good too pass up!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]joshdavis271, 2005-10-15 08:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]litagemini, 2005-10-15 09:05 pm UTC
Great job - [info]yukimurasanada, 2005-10-15 09:43 pm UTC
Re: Great job - [info]litagemini, 2005-10-15 10:14 pm UTC
Re: Great job - [info]yukimurasanada, 2005-10-15 10:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dbrodbeck, 2005-10-17 11:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dbrodbeck, 2005-10-19 10:06 pm UTC

[info]carmine
2005-10-15 08:45 pm UTC (link)
God is in this battle, and I am privileged to be a foot soldier. You all should be concerned, not about me, but about Him.

I think God has more pressing issues to deal with than violent video games. How do we know He hates violent video games, anyway? For all we know, He could be having a grand time playing GTA:SA with this new mod. Come on, doesn't He need a break every now and then from having to listen to lunatics like you, Mr. Thompson?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]joshdavis271
2005-10-15 09:00 pm UTC (link)
We know he likes the sims, haha.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]sothasil
2005-10-15 09:10 pm UTC (link)
Excellent read. I'm not surprised by that Lazlet guy's "shock the audience" tactic. I fucking hate politicians.

I find it funny that Saunders actually admitted that some arguments concerning game regulation have been disproven. Most anti-gamers don't do that. Good on him.

Anderson getting tired of defending himself huh? Good.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

YEE HAW!
(Anonymous)
2005-10-21 11:48 am UTC (link)
It sounds like apt revenge. When a person devotes so much of his time to spoiling the fun of others you've gotta wonder if it's truly an act of regression or supression of his own need to game.I won't say any more for fear of being sued. I'm still hardcore though! Check out my buddy's site.
www.domeafavorbuddy.com

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Well, I'll Be.
[info]mrfalcon
2005-10-15 09:16 pm UTC (link)
v. ex·er·cised, ex·er·cis·ing, ex·er·cis·es
v. tr.

....

5.
1. To absorb the attentions of, especially by worry or anxiety.
2. To stir to anger or alarm; upset: an injustice that exercised the whole community.

(Reply to this)


(176 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…